Visual Model of Plant Development with Respect to Influence of Light

  • Bedřich Beneš
Conference paper
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)

Abstract

This paper deals with simulation of plant development and focuses on influence of light. Most of the previously published methods dealing with light in these simulations use sky discretization, source of aliasing error which was never mentioned in literature. This paper investigates the problem and proposes a solution to it. The second influence which strongly affects the shape of a plant is the relationship between the amount of light and the activity of buds. We offer here a simplified model to demonstrate this dependency.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Aono and T. Kunii. Botanical Tree Image Generation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 4 (5): 10–34, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Arvo and D. Kirk. Modeling Plants with Environment-Sensitive Automata. In Proceedings of Ausgraph’88, pages 27–33, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Beneš. An Efficient Estimation of Light in Simulation of Plant Development. In Computer Animation and Simulation’96, Springer Computer Science, pages 153–165. Springer-Verlag Wien New York, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Beneg. Fast Estimation of Light in Simulation of Plant Development. In Proceedings of WSCG’97,volume I, pages 1–10. University of West Bohemia Press, Feb. 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Chiba, K. Ohshida, K. Muroaka, and S. Nobuji. A Growth Model Having the Abilities of Growth-Regulations for Simulating Visual Nature of Botanical Trees. Computer & Graphics, 18:469–479, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Chiba, K. Ohshida, K. Muroaka, and S. Nobuji. Visual Simulation of Leaf Arrangement and Autumn Colors. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 7:79–93, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Chiba, S. Okawa, K. Muroaka, and M. Muira. Visual Simulation of Botanical Trees Based on Virtual Heliotropism and Dormancy Break. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 5:3–15, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Cohen and J. Wallace. Radiosity and Realistic Image Synthesis. Academic Press Professional, 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. de Reffye, C. Edelin, J. Fraçon, M. Jaeger, and C. Puech. Plants Models Faithful to Botanical Structure and Development. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ’98, volume 22(4) of Annual Conference Series, pages 151–158, 1988.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Dobashi, K. Kazufimo, H. Yamashita, and N. Tomoyuki. Method for Calculation of Sky Light Luminance Aiming at an Interactive Architectural Design. In Computer Graphics Forum, volume 15(3), pages C-109-C-118, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Foley, A. van Dam, S. Feiner, and J. Hughes. Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Greene. Voxel Space Automata: Modeling with Stochastic Growth Processes in Voxel Space. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ’89, volume 23(4) of Annual Conference Series 1989, pages 175–184, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Greene. Detailing Tree Skeleton with Voxel Automata. SIGGRAPH’91, Course Notes on Photorealistic Volume Modeling and Rendering Techniques, 1991.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Holton. Strands, Gravity and Botanical Tree Imagery. Computer Graphics Forum, 13(I):57–67, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Lecoustre, P. de Reffye, M. Jaeger, and P. Dinouard. Controlling the Architectural Geometry of Plant’s Growth - Application to the Begonia Genus. In Computer Animation’92, pages 199–214, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Lintermann and O. Deusen. Interactive Modelling and Animation of Branching Botanical Structures. In Computer Animation and Simulation’96, Springer Computer Science, pages 139–151. Springer-Verlag Wien New York, 1996.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Max and K. Ohsaki. Rendering Trees from Precomputed Z-Buffer Views. In EG WS on Rendering’95, Springer Computer Science, pages 74–81. Springer-Verlag Wien New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Méch and P. Prusinkiewicz. Visual Models of Plants Interacting With Their Environment. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ’86, volume 30(4) of Annual Conference Series 1996, pages 397–410, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Oppenheimer. Real Time Design and Animation of Fractal Plants and Trees. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ’86, volume 20(4) of Annual Conference Series 1986, pages 55–64, 1986.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Prusinkiewicz. Modeling and Visualization of Biological Structures. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface’93, volume I, pages 128–137, 1993.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. Prusinkiewicz. A Look to Visual Modeling of Plants. In German Conference on Bioinformatics, Springer Computer Science. Springer-Verlag Wien New York, 1997. to be published.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Prusinkiewicz and J. Hanan. Visualization of Botanical structures and Processes using parametric L-systems. In Scientific Visualization and Graphics simulation’90, volume 22(4), pages 183–201. J.Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1990.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. Prusinkiewicz, J. Hanan, M. Hammel, and R. Méch. L-systems: from the Theory to Visual Models of Plants. Machine Graphics and Vision, 2(4):12–22, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    P. Prusinkiewicz, M. James, and R. Méch. Synthetic Topiary. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ’94, volume I of Annual Conference Series, pages 351–358, 1993.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    P. Prusinkiewicz, M. James, R. Méch, and J. Hannan. The Artificial Life of Plants. In Course Notes of SIGGRAPH ’95, Computer Graphics, Annual Conference Series 1995, volume I, pages 1–38, 1995.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. Prusinkiewicz and A. Lindenmayer. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. Reeves and R. Blau. Approximate and Probabilistic Algorithms for Shading and Rendering Structured Particle Systems. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ’85, volume 19(3) of Annual Conference Series, pages 313–322, 1985.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    X. Viennot, G. Eyrolles, N. Janey, and D. Arques. Combinatorial Analysis of Ramified Patterns and Computer Imagery Trees. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ’89, volume 23(3) ofAnnual Conference Series, pages 31–40, 1989.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. Weber and J. Penn. Creation and Rendering of Realistic Trees. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ’95, volume 22(4) of Annual Conference Series. SIGGRAPH New York, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bedřich Beneš
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringCzech Technical UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations