PET-Studies in Idiopathic Chronic Hydrocephalus before and after Shunt-Treatment: The Role of Risk Factors for Cerebrovascular Disease (CVD) on Cerebral Hemodynamics

  • P. Klinge
  • Thomas Brinker
  • T. Brinker
  • M. Schuhmann
  • W. H. Knapp
  • M. Samii
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 81)

Summary

Aim

To investigate the impact of cerebrovascular risk factors in idiopathic chronic hydrocephalus concerning cerebral hemodynamics and clinical outcome after shunting.

Global cortical cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebrovascular reserve capacity (CVR) in 53 patients (67 ±11 yrs) were determined by 15-0-water-PET studies before and after administration of aceta-zolamide (1 g) prior (pre), one week (7 d) and seven months (7 m) after shunting. According to the prevalence of vascular risk factors (American subcommittee on reporting standards for cerebrovascular disease) patients were classified into a “low-risk” (n = 27) and “high-risk” (n = 20) group; patients with a history of stroke (n = 6) were separated. After 7 months, clinical outcome was assessed according to Stein and Langfitt.

While CBF in “high-risk” patients prior to surgery was significantly lower in clinical responder compared to non-responder (32 ± 5 vs. 42 ± 15 ml/100 ml/min; p < 0.05), CVR was marginal in both outcome groups (< 30%). One week after shunting, CVR in responder of “high-risk” significantly increased (64 ± 30 vs. 31 ± 10% pre; p < 0.01). In “low-risk” patients, differences in CVR prior to shunting were found: CVR was lower in clinical responder than in non-responder (36 ± 11 vs. 47 ± 22% pre; p > 0.05) and deteriorated in non-responder (29 ± 15% vs. 47 ± 22 pre; p < 0.02) one week after shunting.

Different peri-operative characteristics in global CVR regarding clinical response after shunting between both “risk-groups” were observed. Pathophysiological mechanisms upon clinical sequels after shunting in idiopathic hydrocephalus may not be unique.

Keywords

Idiopathic hydrocephalus cerebrovascular disease hemodynamics outcome 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker JD, Rutherford RB, Bernstein EF et al (1988) Suggested standards for reports dealing with cerebrovascular disease. J Vase Surg 8: 721–729Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boon AJW, Tans JT, Delwel EJ et al (1999) Dutch Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Study: the role of cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg 90: 221–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kraus JK, Regel JP, Vach W et al (1996) Vascular risk factors and arteriosclerotic disease in idiopathic normal-pressure hydro cephalus of the elderly. Stroke 27: 24–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sette G, Baron JC, Mazoyer B, Levasseur M et al (1989) Local brain heamodynamics and oxygen metabolism in cerebrovascular disease. Brain 112: 931–951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stein SC, Langfitt TV (1974) Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Predicting results of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Neurosurg 41: 463–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Klinge
    • 1
  • Thomas Brinker
    • 1
  • T. Brinker
    • 1
  • M. Schuhmann
    • 1
  • W. H. Knapp
    • 2
  • M. Samii
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryMedical School HannoverGermany
  2. 2.Department of Nuclear MedicineMedical School HannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations