Abstract
Evoked potential monitoring has become widely used throughout modern clinical practice as a means to evaluate the anatomical and functional integrity of the spinal cord. The recording of these responses is very important to the physician in circumstances where the patient either cannot or is unwilling to participate in the “gold standard” neurological exam. Most commonly this involves individuals undergoing operative procedures that place the spinal cord at risk of injury. Although clear evidence is lacking, it is generally believed that the detection of electrophysiological changes will alert the surgeon and allow timely intervention, thus preserving or perhaps even improving neurological function. However, despite a large background of basic science and clinical experience, the role of evoked potentials in defining nervous system function remains poorly established.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brodai A (1981) Neurological anatomy in relation to clinical medicine, 3rd Edn. Oxford Press, New York
Ginsburg HH, Shelter AG, Raudzens P (1985) Post-operative paraplegia with preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. A case report. J Neurosurg 63: 296–300
Hurlbert RJ, Fehlings MG, Moncada MS (1995) Cerebellar-evoked potentials to assess integrity of the ventrai tracts of the spinal cord. Perspect Neurol Surg 6: 107–117
Hurlbert RJ, Fehlings MG, Moncada MS (1995) Use of sensory-evoked potentials recorded from the human occiput for intra-operative physiologic monitoring of the spinal cord. Spine 20: 2318–2327
Hurlbert RJ, Koyanagi I, Tator CH (1993) Sensory evoked potentials for selective monitoring of the ventral rat spinal cord: a cerebellar evoked potential for assessing ventral cord integrity. J Neurotrauma 10: 181–200
Hurlbert RJ, Tator CH, Fehlings MF, Niznik G, Linden RD (1992) Evoked potentials from direct cerebellar stimulation for monitoring of the rodent spinal cord. J Neurosurg 76: 280–291
Jones SJ, Edgar MA, Ransford AO (1982) Sensory nerve conduction in the human spinal cord: Epidural recordings made during scoliosis surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 45: 446–451
Lesser RP, Raudzens P, Lueders H, et al (1986) Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol 19: 22–25
Levy WJ, McCaffrey M, Goldman D, et al. (1986) Nonpyramidal motor activation produced by stimulation of the cerebellum, direct or transcranial: a cerebellar evoked potential. Neurosurgery 19: 163–176.
Levy WJ (1988) Use of motor evoked potential as a monitoring tool In: Rossini PM, Marsdens CH (eds) Neurology and Neurobiology, Vol 4L Alan R Liss, New York, pp 275–296
Paxinos G, Watson C (1982) (eds.): The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press, San Diego
Takaki O, Okumura F (1985) Application and limitations of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery: A case report. Aneslhesiology 63: 700–703
Zornow MH, Drummond JC (1989) Intraoperative somatosensory evoked responses recorded during the onset of the anterior spinal artery syndrome. J Cin Monk 5: 243–245
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hurlbert, R.J. (1998). A cerebellar evoked potential for spinal cord monitoring. In: Stålberg, E., Sharma, H.S., Olsson, Y. (eds) Spinal Cord Monitoring. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6464-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6464-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7329-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6464-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive