Advertisement

Management of the Aortic Arch in the Modern Era

  • Joshua B. Goldberg
  • Steven Lansman
  • David SpielvogelEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

There are two main treatment strategies for advanced aortic arch pathology: traditional surgical replacement and hybrid repair. Regardless of the treatment strategy, cerebral protection is of paramount importance to minimize morbidity and mortality. As result, numerous cerebral protection strategies have been utilized including hypothermia and cerebral perfusion which have rendered aortic arch interventions safe. Traditional open arch replacement represents the gold standard by which all other aortic arch interventions should be measured as it has been shown to be safe and effective. Recently, hybrid arch procedures have been developed which incorporate both open surgical replacement and thoracic aortic endograft repair. While effective with specific anatomy and patient populations, hybrid arch repair in its current state has not supplanted open surgical repair in the general population.

Keywords

Aortic arch replacement Hybrid aortic arch repair Cerebral protection Circulatory arrest Selective cerebral perfusion 

References

  1. 1.
    Griepp RB, Stinson EB, Hollingsworth JF, Buehler D. Prosthetic replacement of the aortic arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;70(6):1051–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCullough JN, Zhang N, Reich DL, Juvonen TS, Klein JJ, Spielvogel D, et al. Cerebral metabolic suppression during hypothermic circulatory arrest in humans. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(6):1895–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Urbanski PP, Wagner M. Perfusion and repair technique in acute aortic dissection with cerebral malperfusion and damage of the innominate artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(4):982–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ehrlich MP, Hagl C, McCullough JN, Zhang N, Shiang H, Bodian C, et al. Retrograde cerebral perfusion provides negligible flow through brain capillaries in the pig. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(2):331–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borst HG, Walterbusch G, Schaps D. Extensive aortic replacement using “elephant trunk” prosthesis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;31(1):37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spielvogel D, Strauch JT, Minanov OP, Lansman SL, Griepp RB. Aortic arch replacement using a trifurcated graft and selective cerebral antegrade perfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(5):S1810–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Urbanski PP, Lenos A, Bougioukakis P, Neophytou I, Zacher M, Diegeler A. Mild-to-moderate hypothermia in aortic arch surgery using circulatory arrest: a change of paradigm? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41(1):185–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bischoff MS, Scheumann J, Brenner RM, Ladage D, Bodian CA, Kleinman G, et al. Staged approach prevents spinal cord injury in hybrid surgical-endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: an experimental model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(1):138–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua B. Goldberg
    • 1
  • Steven Lansman
    • 1
  • David Spielvogel
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryWestchester Medical CenterValhallaUSA

Personalised recommendations