RoboSculpt

Unique molds for design with minimal waste
  • Mathew Schwartz
  • Jason Prasad

Abstract

This paper describes a novel work-flow for minimal waste custom design manufacturing through the integration of traditional sculpture techniques and current manufacturing technology. This is demonstrated by using oil clay as a mold material for fiberglass layups. In addition to being reusable, the use of a malleable material allows for a non-rotating cutting tool on a 7-axis robot, addressing some current manufacturing limitations such as uniformity of the cutting tool, undercuts, and surface defects. The work-flow is demonstrated through the creation of a chair. The chair has multiple curvature and is constructed using two molds, both employing the same material. Fiberglass is used as the final products material demonstrating a selective application for minimal waste from both mold and final materials.

Keywords

minimal waste robotics design sculpture prototyping 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cani MP, and Angelidis A 2006, Towards Virtual Clay. SIGGRAPH pp. 67–83. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  2. Chen Y, and Gu YL 1993. “Optimal path generation of a (6+1)-axis robot for auto-industrial applications.” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 388–395.Google Scholar
  3. Gramazio F, and Kohler M 2008, Digital Materiality in Architecture. Baden: Lars Muller Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Her MG, Hsu KS, Lan TS, and Karkoub M 2002, “Haptic Direct-Drive Robot Control Scheme in Virtual Reality.” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, pp. 247–264.Google Scholar
  5. Lazoglu I 2003, “Sculpture surface machining: a generalized model of ball-end milling force system.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, pp. 453–462.Google Scholar
  6. Lucchesi B and Malmstrom M 1996, Modeling the Head in Clay. Watson-Guptill Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Payne, A 2011, “A Five-axis Robotic Motion Controller for Designers.” Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), pp. 162–169.Google Scholar
  8. Pigram D, and Mcgee W 2011, “Formation Embedded Design.” Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), pp. 122–131.Google Scholar
  9. Willis KD, Xu C, Wu KJ, Levin G, and Gross MD 2010, “Interactive Fabrication: New Interfaces for Digital Fabrication.” Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction pp. 69–72. ACM.Google Scholar
  10. Yan F, Hou Z, Zhang D, and Kang W 2009, “Virtual Clay Modeling System with 6-DOF Haptic Feedback.” Materials Science Forum, pp. 155–160.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathew Schwartz
  • Jason Prasad

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations