This paper describes a novel work-flow for minimal waste custom design manufacturing through the integration of traditional sculpture techniques and current manufacturing technology. This is demonstrated by using oil clay as a mold material for fiberglass layups. In addition to being reusable, the use of a malleable material allows for a non-rotating cutting tool on a 7-axis robot, addressing some current manufacturing limitations such as uniformity of the cutting tool, undercuts, and surface defects. The work-flow is demonstrated through the creation of a chair. The chair has multiple curvature and is constructed using two molds, both employing the same material. Fiberglass is used as the final products material demonstrating a selective application for minimal waste from both mold and final materials.
Keywordsminimal waste robotics design sculpture prototyping
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cani MP, and Angelidis A 2006, Towards Virtual Clay. SIGGRAPH pp. 67–83. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Chen Y, and Gu YL 1993. “Optimal path generation of a (6+1)-axis robot for auto-industrial applications.” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 388–395.Google Scholar
- Gramazio F, and Kohler M 2008, Digital Materiality in Architecture. Baden: Lars Muller Publishers.Google Scholar
- Her MG, Hsu KS, Lan TS, and Karkoub M 2002, “Haptic Direct-Drive Robot Control Scheme in Virtual Reality.” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, pp. 247–264.Google Scholar
- Lazoglu I 2003, “Sculpture surface machining: a generalized model of ball-end milling force system.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, pp. 453–462.Google Scholar
- Lucchesi B and Malmstrom M 1996, Modeling the Head in Clay. Watson-Guptill Publications.Google Scholar
- Payne, A 2011, “A Five-axis Robotic Motion Controller for Designers.” Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), pp. 162–169.Google Scholar
- Pigram D, and Mcgee W 2011, “Formation Embedded Design.” Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), pp. 122–131.Google Scholar
- Willis KD, Xu C, Wu KJ, Levin G, and Gross MD 2010, “Interactive Fabrication: New Interfaces for Digital Fabrication.” Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction pp. 69–72. ACM.Google Scholar
- Yan F, Hou Z, Zhang D, and Kang W 2009, “Virtual Clay Modeling System with 6-DOF Haptic Feedback.” Materials Science Forum, pp. 155–160.Google Scholar