Autoregulatory Model Comparison and Optimisation Methodology

Chapter
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 114)

Abstract

Cerebral pressure autoregulation (AR) is a process by which blood flow is kept constant over a specific cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) range. There have been a number of advances in recent years in the monitoring and modelling of this physiological variable; however, there has been very little work done on the comparison or optimisation of some of the existing models in clinical use today: pressure reactivity index, highest modal frequency techniques and compartmental modelling. Presented here is a methodology for the comparison and optimisation results for these main AR models. By simple mathematical manipulation of the original modelling end points each model can be converted into a form that is directly comparable to the others. Using a standardised data set with known gold standard AR status indications, the models can then be readily assessed. As a consequence each of the models can then be optimised to maximise specificity and sensitivity.

Keywords

CBF autoregulation Intracranial pressure Mathematical modelling Head trauma 

Notes

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Coles JP, Fryer TD, Bradley PG, Nortje J, Smielewski P, Rice K, Clark JC, Pickard JD, Menon DK (2006) Intersubject variability and reproducibility of 150 PET studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26:48–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czosnyka M, Piechnik S, Richards HK, Kirkpatrick P, Smielewski P, Pickard JD (1997) Contribution of mathematical modelling to the interpretation of bedside tests of cerebrovascular autoregulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 63:721–731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daley ML, Pourcyrous M, Timmons SD, Leffler CW (2004) Assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation: changes of highest modal frequency of cerebrovascular pressure transmission with cerebral perfusion pressure. Stroke 35:1952–1956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nocedal J, Wright S (2006) Numerical optimization, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin/New York. ISBN 978-0-387-30303-1Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shibata M, Einhaus S, Schweitzer JB, Zuckerman S, Leffler CW (1993) Cerebral blood flow decreased by adrenergic stimulation of cerebral vessels in anesthetized newborn pigs with traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 79:696–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ursino M, Lodi CA (1997) A simple mathematical model of the interaction between intracranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamics. J Appl Physiol 82:1256–1269PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical PhysicsInstitute of Neurological Sciences, Sothern General HospitalGlasgow, ScotlandUK
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations