Advertisement

Supporting Data Privacy in P2P Systems

  • Mohamed Jawad
  • Patricia Serrano-Alvarado
  • Patrick Valduriez
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Social Networks book series (LNSN)

Abstract

Peer-to-Peer (P2P) systems have been very successful for large-scale data sharing. However, sharing sensitive data, like in online social networks, without appropriate access control, can have undesirable impact on data privacy. Data can be accessed by everyone (by potentially untrusted peers) and used for everything (e.g., for marketing or activities against the owner’s preferences or ethics). Hippocratic databases (HDB) provide an effective solution to this problem, by integrating purpose-based access control for privacy protection. However, the use of HDB has been restricted to centralized systems. This chapter gives an overview of current solutions for supporting data privacy in P2P systems and develops in more detail a complete solution based on HDB.

Keywords

Access Control Privacy Policy Data Privacy Trust Level Data Owner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal, R., Bird, P., Grandison, T., Kiernan, J., Logan, S., Rjaibi, W.: Extending relational database systems to automatically enforce privacy policies. In: IEEE Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Tokyo, Japan (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agrawal, R., Kiernan, J., Srikant, R., Xu, Y.: Hippocratic databases. In: Very Large Databases (VLDB), Hong Kong, China (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akbarinia, R., Martins, V., Pacitti, E., Valduriez, P.: Design and implementation of APPA. In: Baldoni, R., Cortese, G., Davide, F. (eds.) Global Data Management. IOS Press, pp. 98–123 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Byun, J.W., Li:, N.: Purpose based access control for privacy protection in relational database systems. Very Large Databases (VLDB) J. 17(4) (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castro, M., Druschel, P., Ganesh, A., Rowstron, A., Wallach, D.S.: Secure routing for structured peer-to-peer overlay networks. In: Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), Boston, MA (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chaum, D.L.: Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and digital pseudonyms. Comm. ACM 24(2) (1981)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choffnes, D.R., Duch, J., Malmgren, D., Guierma, R., Bustamante, F.E., Amaral, L.: SwarmScreen: privacy through plausible deniability in P2P systems. Tech. rep., Northwestern EECS University (March 2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarke, I., Miller, S.G., Hong, T.W., Sandberg, O., Wiley, B.: Protecting free expression online with freenet. IEEE Internet Comput. 6(1) (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cranor, L., Langheinrich, M., Marchiori, M., Presler-Marshall, M., Reagle, J.: The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0) Specification (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daswani, N., Garcia-Molina, H., Yang, B.: Open problems in data-sharing peer-to-peer systems. In: International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT), Siena, Italy (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B.: Studying online social networks. J. Comput. Mediat. Comm. 3(1) (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hand, S., Roscoe, T.: Mnemosyne: peer-to-peer steganographic storage. In: International Peer To Peer Systems Workshop (IPTPS), Cambridge, MA (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Howell, F., McNab, R.: Simjava: a discrete event simulation library for Java. In: International Conference on Web-Based Modeling and Simulation, San Diego, CA (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Isdal, T., Piatek, M., Krishnamurthy, A., Anderson, T.: Privacy-preserving P2P data sharing with oneswarm. Tech. rep., University of Washington (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jawad, M.: Data privacy in P2P systems. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Nantes (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jawad, M., Serrano-Alvarado, P., Valduriez, P.: Protecting data privacy in structured P2P networks. In: Data Management in Grid and P2P Systems (Globe), Linz, Austria (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jawad, M., Serrano-Alvarado, P., Valduriez, P., Drapeau, S.: A data privacy service for structured P2P systems. In: Mexican International Conference in Computer Science (ENC), México D.F., México (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jawad, M., Serrano-Alvarado, P., Valduriez, P., Drapeau, S.: Data privacy in structured P2P systems with PriServ. In: Bases de Données Avancées (BDA), Namur, Begium (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jawad, M., Serrano-Alvarado, P., Valduriez, P., Drapeau, S.: Privacy support for sensitive data sharing in P2P systems. In: Bases de Données Avancées (BDA), demonstration paper, Rabat, Morocco (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karjoth, G., Schunter, M., Waidner, M.: Platform for enterprise privacy practices: privacy-enabled management of customer data. In: Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, San Francisco, CA (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kleinberg, J., Papadimitriou, C.H., Raghavan, P.: On the value of private information. In: Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK), Siena, Italy (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kubiatowicz, J., Bindel, D., Chen, Y., Czerwinski, S.E., Eaton, P.R., Geels, D., Gummadi, R., Rhea, S.C., Weatherspoon, H., Weimer, W., Wells, C., Zhao, B.Y.: OceanStore: An architecture for global-scale persistent storage. In: Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS), Cambridge, MA (2000)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Langheinrich, M.: A P3P Preference Exchange Language (APPEL1.0) Specification (2001)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liberty Alliance Project, Privacy Preference Expression Languages (PPELs). http://projectliberty.org/liberty/content/download/371/2670/file/Final_PPEL_White_Paper.pdf
  25. 25.
    LeFevre, K., Agrawal, R., Ercegovac, V., Ramakrishnan, R., Xu, Y., DeWitt, D.J.: Limiting disclosure in hippocratic databases. In: Very Large Databases (VLDB), Toronto, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mell, P., Grance, T.: The NIST definition of cloud computing. Natl. Inst. Stand. Tech. 53(6) (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miklau, G., Suciu, D.: Controlling access to published data using cryptography. In: Very Large Databases (VLDB), Berlin, Germany (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nejdl, W., Wolf, B., Qu, C., Decker, S., Sintek, M., Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., Palmér, M., Risch, T.: Edutella: A P2P networking infrastructure based on RDF. In: ACM World Wide Web Conference (WWW), Hawaii, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ozsu, M.T., Valduriez, P.: Principles of Distributed Database Systems, 3rd edn. Springer, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    1.1.0 P3P Purposes of Data Collection Elements. http://p3pwriter.com/LRN_041.asp
  31. 31.
    Pfitzmann, A., Hansen, M.: A terminology for talking about privacy by data minimization: anonymity, unlinkability, undetectability, unobservability, pseudonymity, and identity management. Tech. rep., Dresden University of Technology (2009)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Roncancio, C., del Pilar Villamil, M., Labbé, C., Serrano-Alvarado, P.: Data sharing in DHT based P2P systems. Trans. Large Scale Data Knowl. Centered Syst. I 5740 (2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rowstron, A., House, G.: Storage management and caching in PAST, a large-scale, persistent peer-to-peer storage utility. In: Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), Banff, Alberta, Canada (2001)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rowstron, A.I.T., Druschel, P.: Pastry: scalable, decentralized object location, and routing for large-scale peer-to-peer systems. In: ACM/IFIP/USENIX Middleware Conference (MIDDLEWARE), Heidelberg, Germany (2001)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ryu, S., Butler, K., Traynor, P., McDaniel, P.: Leveraging identity-based cryptography for node ID assignment in structured P2P systems. In: Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINA), Niagara Falls, Canada (2007)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, D.R., Kaashoek, M.F., Balakrishnan, H.: Chord: a scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications. In: ACM Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication (SIGCOMM), San Diego, CA (2001)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stubblefield, A., S.Wallach, D.: Dagster: Censorship-Resistant Publishing without Replication. Tech. rep., Rice University (2001)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tatarinov, I., Ives, Z.G., Madhavan, J., Halevy, A.Y., Suciu, D., Dalvi, N.N., Dong, X., Kadiyska, Y., Miklau, G., Mork, P.: The piazza peer data management project. ACM Spec. Interest Group Manag. Data (SIGMOD) Rec. 32(3) (2003)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Waldman, M., Mazières, D.: Tangler: a censorship-resistant publishing system based on document entanglements. In: Computer and Communications Security (CCS), Philadelphia, PA (2001)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Westin, A.F.: Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhao, B.Y., Huang, L., Stribling, J., Rhea, S.C., Joseph, A.D., Kubiatowicz, J.: Tapestry: a resilient global-scale overlay for service deployment. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm. 22(1) (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Jawad
    • 1
  • Patricia Serrano-Alvarado
    • 1
  • Patrick Valduriez
    • 2
  1. 1.LINAUniversity of NantesNantesFrance
  2. 2.INRIA and LIRMMUniversity of MontpellierMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations