Cloud riders

  • Jacques Arnould
Part of the Studies in Space Policy book series (STUDSPACE, volume 6)


Forty years after man first set foot on the surface of a celestial body other than the Earth, the debate over the opportunity of sending humans into space remains topical. The place that humans currently occupy in space exploration and conquest is perhaps changing compared with what it has been until now. This change is both qualitative and quantitative. It is qualitative in that pioneering spirit is no longer what it was. Astronauts, cosmonauts and taikonauts continue to recruit from among the top aviation pilots although they are gradually being joined in space by engineers, scientists and doctors. The “right stuff” has certainly not disappeared but its makeup has altered. Without becoming banal, space has become humanised, if only due to the influence of women. Without doubt, when exploration of the planet Mars by a team of humans (when? no one today is bold enough to set a specific date), is no longer a dream but is actually being implemented and planned, will this “stuff” once again find its initial splendour, reminding us of the days of Gagarin, Glenn, Armstrong or Aldrin? However, between now and then, a quantitative change will probably have occurred, with a significant increase in the number of astronauts. The completion of the construction of the international space station in circumterrestrial orbit and its occupation has already played a part. What is to stop the development, even small-scale, of space tourism? For all that, however common the presence of humans in space might become, the questions “how” and “why” will continue to be asked.


International Space Station Launch Vehicle Crew Member Solar Eruption Apollo Mission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 23.
    Lebeau, André. L’Espace. Les enjeux et les mythes. Paris: Hachette, 1998: 185.Google Scholar
  2. 24.
    Salomon, Jean-Jacques. “Le risque technologique et l’aventure spatiale”. Zénon. 2 (1997): 38.Google Scholar
  3. 25.
    Lagadec, Patrick. La civilisation du risque. Catastrophes technologiques et responsabilité sociale. Paris: Seuil, 1981: 221–222.Google Scholar
  4. 26.
    Latour, Bruno. “Comment évaluer l’innovation?” La Recherche. 314 (1998): 85.Google Scholar
  5. 27.
    Lesgards, Roger. Conquête spatiale et démocratie. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 1998: 24–25.Google Scholar
  6. 28.
    Lebeau, André. L’Espace. Les enjeux et les mythes. 13–14.Google Scholar
  7. 29.
    Quoted in Arnould, Jacques. La seconde chance d’Icare. 199–200.Google Scholar
  8. 30.
    Lafferranderie, Gabriel. “Espace juridique et juridiction de l’espace.” L’Homme dans l’espace. Ed. Alain Esterle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993: 255.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques Arnould
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre National d’Etudes SpatialesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations