Abstract

The time-series in Appendix 2 will be analyzed to understand the structure and the properties of the data. Several tests will be performed: The software of Minitab for Macintosh release 10.5 Xtra Power and Econometric Views (“Eviews”) for Windows release 1.0A were used.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 189.
    The Karlsruhe data base gives the value of 9999.999999 for missing data points.Google Scholar
  2. 190.
    It turned out that the series ‘hgm ret’ and the ‘bmo ret’ had 2 and 1 erroneous return, respectively, due to a bug in the Karlsruhe data bank. The errors were notified and corrected.Google Scholar
  3. 191.
    Independently and identically distributed.Google Scholar
  4. 192.
    Shapiro-Wilk, skewness, kurtosis, Chi-square, Kolmogorov and Durbin test, among others.Google Scholar
  5. 193.
    All tables are put at the end into Appendix 6 for readability.Google Scholar
  6. 194.
    A martingale implies that the expected value of a stock in the period t + n is equal to the price of the stock today. Mathematically it could be expressed as follows:(Math) See also Granger and Morgenstern (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 195.
    5 breweries series, i.e. ‘psc’, ‘bavl’, ‘bav2’, ‘brc’, ‘pbr’, did not meet the criteria for the event study sample but were used here for comparative purposes.Google Scholar
  8. 196.
    ‘pbr ret’ and ‘bavl ret’ end on June 8, 94 and November 26, 93, respectively.Google Scholar
  9. 197.
    Based on 250 trading days per year.Google Scholar
  10. 198.
    Note that the returns are not comparable among each other because they come from different periods in time.Google Scholar
  11. 199.
    Dickey-Fuller.Google Scholar
  12. 200.
    Most series have a positive mean; 13 (out of 44, thus 29.5%) have a negative one.Google Scholar
  13. 201.
    For a=0.01 n must exceed 5, 100.Google Scholar
  14. 202.
    Further press research would be necessary to determine this statement.Google Scholar
  15. 203.
    For spacing consideration, Table 6.14 only reports the results at lag 12.Google Scholar
  16. 204.
    Seven series could be possibly modeled by more than one process.Google Scholar
  17. 205.
    ‘alb ret’, ‘bmo ret’, ‘bud ret’, lef ret’, ‘mei ret’, and ‘olg ret’.Google Scholar
  18. 206.
    See also discussion on non-synchronous trading in Section 4.4.Google Scholar
  19. 207.
    Of the 70 M-Dax companies 13 are dominated by private owners (or families): Dürr, Dyckerhoff, FAG, Herlitz, Hornbach Holding, Jungheinrich, Kampa-Haus, Krones, MLP, Porsche, VARTA, Vossloh, Wella. Within the smaller tier companies listed in Germany the percentage of companies dominated by private owners would obviously be larger.Google Scholar
  20. 208.
    See discussion in Section 2.3 and Table 2.2. Also, Becht and Böhmer (1997) give a good survey on ownership and control of German companies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Randolf Scheller

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations