Advertisement

Versuchsplanung und Versuchsdesign

  • Marc NaguibEmail author
  • E. Tobias Krause
Chapter
  • 52 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Einer deskriptive Studie, in der das unbeeinflusste Verhalten von Tieren beobachtet wird, müssen andere Überlegungen vorausgehen als einer experimentellen Studie. Bei einer experimentellen Studie wird ein Tier in einem vom Versuchsleiter kontrollierten Experiment getestet oder in einer experimentell kontrollierten Umwelt gehalten. Dies kann sowohl in einer Laborsituation als auch im Freiland geschehen.

Literatur

  1. Aarts AA, Anderson JE, Anderson CJ, Attridge PR, Attwood A et al (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349:aac4716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Briga M, Koetsier E, Boonekamp JJ, Jimeno B, Verhulst S (2017) Food availability affects adult survival trajectories depending on early developmental conditions. Proc R Soc 284:20162287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caro TM, Roper R, Young M, Dank GR (1979) Inter-observer reliability. Behaviour 69:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caspers BA, Schroeder FC, Franke S, Streich WJ, Voigt CC (2009) Odour-based species recognition in two sympatric species of sac-winged bats (Saccopteryx bilineata, S. leptura): combining chemical analyses, behavioural observations and odour preference tests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:741–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chakarov N, Pauli M, Krüger O (2017) Immune responses link parasite genetic diversity, prevalence and plumage morphs in common buzzards. Evol Ecol 31:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley MJ (2013) The R book, 2. Aufl. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  7. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gierszewski S, Müller K, Smielik I, Hütwohl JM, Kuhnert KD, Witte K (2017) The virtual lover: variable and easily guided 3D fish animations as an innovative tool in mate-choice experiments with sailfin mollies-II. Validation. Curr Zool 63:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Groothuis TGG, Trillmich F (2011) Unfolding personalities: the importance of studying ontogeny. Dev Psychobiol 53:641–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holveck MJ, Riebel K (2007) Preferred songs predict preferred males: consistency and repeatability of zebra finch females across three test contexts. Anim Behav 74:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Honarmand M, Goymann W, Naguib M (2010) Stressful dieting: nutritional conditions but not compensatory growth elevate corticosterone levels in Zebra Finch nestlings and fledglings. PLoS ONE 5:e12930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones AE, Ten Cate C, Bijleveld CJH (2001) The interobserver reliability of scoring sonagrams by eye: a study on methods, illustrated on zebra finch songs. Anim Behav 62:791–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Köhler W, Schachtel G, Voleske P (2012) Biostatistik: eine Einführung für Biologen und Agrarwissenschaftler. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krause ET (2016) Colour cues that are not directly attached to the body of males do not influence the mate choice of Zebra Finches. PLoS ONE 11:e0167674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krause ET, Krüger O, Schielzeth H (2017) Long-term effects of early nutrition and environmental matching on developmental and personality traits in zebra finches. Anim Behav 128:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krüger O, Lindström J (2001) Lifetime reproductive success in common buzzard, Buteo buteo: from individual variation to population demography. Oikos 93:260–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lea AM, Ryan MJ (2015) Irrationality in mate choice revealed by tungara frogs. Science 349:964–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Monaghan P (2008) Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change. Philosohical Trans R Soc London 363:1635–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Naguib M, Floercke C, van Oers K (2011) Effects of social conditions during early development on stress response and personality traits in great tits (Parus major). Dev Psychobiol 53:592–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Richter SH, Garner JP, Auer C, Kunert J, Würbel H (2010) Systematic variation improves reproducibility of animal experiments. Nat Methods 7:167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruxton GD (1998) Experimental design: minimizing suffering may not always mean minimizing the number of subjects. Anim Behav 56:511–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schielzeth H, Nakagawa S (2013) Nested by design: model fitting and interpretation in a mixed model era. Methods Ecol Evol 4:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schrader L, Müller B (2009) Night-time roosting in the domestic fowl: the height matters. Appl Anim Behav Sci 121:179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Still AW (1982) On the number of subjects used in animal behaviour experiments. Anim Behav 30:873–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Witte K, Sawka N (2003) Sexual imprinting on a novel trait in the dimorphic zebra finch: sexes differ. Anim Behav 65:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolf M, Van Doorn GS, Leimar O, Weissing FJ (2007) Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities. Nature 447:581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wollschläger D (2016) R kompakt – der schnelle Einstieg in die Datenanalyse, 2. Aufl. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  29. Würbel H (2000) Behaviour and the standardization fallacy. Nat Genet 26:263CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behavioural Ecology GroupWageningen University & ResearchWageningenNiederlande
  2. 2.Institut für Tierschutz und TierhaltungFriedrich-Loeffler-InstitutCelleDeutschland

Personalised recommendations