Advertisement

Allgemeine Grundlagen

  • Marc NaguibEmail author
  • E. Tobias Krause
Chapter
  • 37 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Beobachtungen des Verhaltens von Tieren führen meist zu den Fragen „Was?“, „Wie?“, „Warum?“, „Wann?“ oder auch „Wer?“ und „Wo?“. Solche Fragen und deren mögliche Antworten führen zur Bildung von Hypothesen und den davon abgeleiteten Vorhersagen. Klare Hypothesen und die darauf aufbauenden Schritte der wissenschaftlichen Methodik bilden eine der grundlegenden Voraussetzungen anspruchsvoller wissenschaftlicher Arbeit.

Literatur

  1. Aarts AA, Anderson JE, Anderson CJ, Attridge PR, Attwood A et al (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349:aac4716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson PPG (1977) Testing an observer’s ability to identify individual animals. Anim Behav 25:247–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateson P (2005) Ethics and behavioural biology. Adv Study Behav 35:211–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown DD, LaPoint S, Kays R, Heidrich W, Kümmeth F, Wikelski M (2012) Accelerometer-informed GPS telemetry: reducing the trade-off between resolution and longevity. Wildl Soc Bull 36:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burley N (1981) Sex-ratio manipulation and selection for attractiveness. Science 211:721–722CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Cagnacci F, Boitani L, Powell RA, Boyce MS (2010) Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 365:2157–2162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawkins MS (1980) Animal suffering: the science of animal welfare. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawkins MS (2006) A user’s guide to animal welfare science. Trends Ecol Evol 21:77–82CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Dennis RL, Newberry RC, Cheng HW, Estevez I (2008) Appearance matters: artificial marking alters aggression and stress. Poult Sci 87:1939–1946CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Drechsler A, Helling T, Steinfartz S (2015) Genetic fingerprinting proves cross-correlated automatic photo-identification of individuals as highly efficient in large capture–mark–recapture studies. Ecol Evol 5:141–151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Dudde A, Krause ET, Matthews LR, Schrader L (2018) More than eggs – relationship between productivity and learning in laying hens. Front Psychol 9:2000CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAWC (2010) Annual review 2009–2010. Farm Animal Welfare Council, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Forstmeier W, Segelbacher G, Mueller J, Kempenaers B (2007) Genetic variation and differentiation in captive and wild zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Mol Ecol 16:4039–4050CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Fraser H, Parker T, Nakagawa S, Barnett A, Fidler F (2018) Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution. PLoS ONE 13:e0200303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Gil D, Graves J, Hazon N, Wells A (1999) Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286:126–128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Goedbloed JD, Segev O, Küpfer E, Pietzsch N, Matthe M, Steinfartz S (2017) Evaluation of a new Amphident module and sources of automated photo identification errors using data from Salamandra infraimmaculata. Salamandra 53:314–318Google Scholar
  18. Hofer H, East ML (1993) The commuting system of Serengeti spotted hyaenas: how a predator copes with migratory prey. I. Social organization. Anim Behav 46:547–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffman JI, Krause ET, Lehmann K, Krüger O (2014) MC1R genotype and plumage colouration in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata): population structure generates artefactual associations. PLoS ONE 9:e86519CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hubrecht RC (2014) The welfare of animals used in research: practice and ethics. Wiley, AmesGoogle Scholar
  21. Immelmann K, Beer C (1989) A dictionary of ethology. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensen P (2006) Domestication – from behaviour to genes and back again. Appl Anim Behav Sci 97:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaiser S, Sachser N (2005) The effects of prenatal social stress on behaviour: mechanisms and function. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:283–294CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Manrique HM, Völter CJ, Call J (2013) Repeated innovation in great apes. Anim Behav 85:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCulloch SP (2013) A critique of FAWC’s five freedoms as a framework for the analysis of animal welfare. J Agric Environ Ethics 26:959–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meise K, Krüger O, Piedrahita P, Trillmich F (2013) Site fidelity of male Galápagos sea lions: a lifetime perspective. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1001–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pariser EC, Mariette MM, Griffith SC (2010) Artificial ornaments manipulate intrinsic male quality in wild-caught zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Behav Ecol 21:264–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parker TH, Forstmeier W, Koricheva J, Fidler F et al (2016) Transparency in ecology and evolution: real problems, real solutions. Trends Ecol Evol 31:711–719CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Pepperberg IM (2009) The Alex studies: cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Price EO (1997) Behavioural genetics and the process of animal domestication. In: Grandin T (Hrsg) Genetics and the behaviour of domestic animals. Academic Press, London, S 31–65Google Scholar
  31. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruxton GD (1998) Experimental design: minimizing suffering may not always mean minimizing the number of subjects. Anim Behav 56:511–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sachser N, Hennessy MB, Kaiser S (2011) Adaptive modulation of behavioural profiles by social stress during early phases of life and adolescence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:1518–1533CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Schielzeth H, Nakagawa S (2013) Nested by design: model fitting and interpretation in a mixed model era. Methods Ecol Evol 4:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schubbert A, Schrader L (2018) Tierwohl messen in der landwirtschaftlichen Praxis. Der Praktische Tierarzt 99:1173–1186Google Scholar
  37. Seguin A, Forstmeier W (2012) No band color effects on male courtship rate or body mass in the zebra finch: four experiments and a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 7:e37785CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Snijders L, Weme LEN, de Goede P, Savage JL, van Oers K, Naguib M (2017) Context-dependent effects of radio transmitter attachment on a small passerine. J Avian Biol 48:650–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tannenbaum J, Bennett BT (2015) Russell and Burch’s 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 54:120–132PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Tschirren B, Rutstein AN, Postma E, Mariette M, Griffith SC (2009) Short- and long-term consequences of early developmental conditions: a case study on wild and domesticated zebra finches. J Evol Biol 22:387–395CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. van Oers K, Kohn GM, Hinde CA, Naguib M (2015) Parental food provisioning is related to nestling stress response in wild great tit nestlings: implications for the development of personality. Front Zool 12:S10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson B, Thompson PM, Hammond PS (1997) Habitat use by bottlenose dolphins: seasonal distribution and stratified movement patterns in the Moray Firth, Scotland. J Appl Ecol 34:1365–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolf JBW, Mawdsley D, Trillmich F, James R (2007) Social structure in a colonial mammal: unravelling hidden structural layers and their foundations by network analysis. Anim Behav 74:1293–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behavioural Ecology GroupWageningen University & ResearchWageningenNiederlande
  2. 2.Institut für Tierschutz und TierhaltungFriedrich-Loeffler-InstitutCelleDeutschland

Personalised recommendations