Advertisement

Artificial Intelligence and Responsibility

  • Klaus MainzerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Technik im Fokus book series (TECHNIK)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is an international future topic in research and technology, economy, and society. But research and technical innovation at AI are not enough. AI technology will dramatically change the way we live and work. The global competition of the social systems (e.g., Chinese state monopolism, US-American IT giants, European market economy with individual freedom rights) will decisively depend on how we position our European value system in the AI world.

References

  1. 1.
    von Weizsäcker CF (1978) The responsibility of science in the atomic age, 6th edn. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hinsley FH, Stripp A (1993) Codebreakers—the inside story of Bletchley Park. Oxford University Press, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fucks W (1965) Formulas to power. Forecasts about peoples, economy, potentials, 3rd edn. German Publishing House, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mainzer K (2014) The computation of the world. From the theory of everything to big data. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Planning Outline for the Construction for a Social Credit System (2014–2020) China Copyright and Media. 14 June 2014 (wordpress.com)
  6. 6.
    Yonxiang Lu (ed) (2010) Science & technology in China: a roadmap to 2050. Strategic general report of the Chinese academy of sciences, Beijing (Science Press). Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chunli B (ed) (2014) Vision 2020: emerging trends in science and technology and strategic option of China. BCAS 28(1):107–113Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Confucius (2007) The Great Learning = Da Xue. Chinese Text Project. http://ctext.org/analects. Accessed 18 Jan 2016
  9. 9.
    Huang C (2009) Confucianism: continuity and development. transcript, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayes LD (2012) Political systems of East Asia. China, Korea and Japan. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hartmann WD, Maenning W, Wang Run (2017) China’s new silk road. Cooperation instead of isolation—the role reversal in world trade. Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch, Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kant I (1900) Edition of the Prussian Academy of Sciences. Berlin, AA IV, 421: “Act only according to the maxim by which you can at the same time want it to become a general law.”Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nida-Rümelin J (2011) Responsibility. Reclam, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hart HL (1968) Punishment and responsibility. Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baumgartner HM, Eser A (eds) (1983) Guilt and responsibility: philosophical and legal contributions to the accountability of human actions. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, p 136Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zech H (2012) Information as object of protection. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mainzer K (2016) Information: algorithm, probability, complexity, quantum world, life, brain, society. Berlin University Press, Berlin, p 172Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jonas H (1979) The principle of responsibility. Attempt at ethics for technological civilization. Suhrkamp, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emeritus of ExcellenceTechnical University of Munich MunichGermany
  2. 2.Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker Center Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen TübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations