Compensation Systems

  • Volker Eric Amelung
Part of the Springer Texts in Business and Economics book series (STBE)


The design of compensation systems for service providers is an essential control instrument in managed care. In order to better understand this instrument and its effects, the basic principles of compensation systems will first be generally described (see Fig. 10.1) so that the managed care compensation systems can be outlined in more detail.


  1. AHA. (2014). Quality reporting and pay-for-performance. Last accessed July 21, 2016, from
  2. Amelung, V. E. (2007). Integrierte Versorgung – von Pilotprojekten zur “wirklichen” Regelversorgung. Gesundheits- und Sozialpolitik, 1(2), 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amelung, V. E. (2012). Managed care: Neue Wege im Gesundheitsmanagement. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amelung, V. E., & Zahn, T. (2009). Pay-for-Performance (P4P) – Der Business Case für Qualität? Berlin: DxCG-Study.Google Scholar
  5. Amelung, V. E., Voss, H., & Janus, K. (2005). Ökonomische Anreize in integrierten Versorgungssystemen – Grundlage für Nachhaltigkeit, Zufriedenheit und Motivation. In B. Badura & O. Iseringhausen (Eds.), Wege aus der Krise der Versorgungssituation – Beiträge aus der Versorgungsforschung (pp. 115–131). Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  6. Amelung, V. E., Jensen, S. O., Krauth, C., & Wolf, S. (2013). Pay-for-Performance: Märchen oder Chance einer qualitätsorientierten Vergütung? Gesundheits- und Gesellschaft Wissenschaft, 13(2), 7–15.Google Scholar
  7. Aziz, Z. (2012, November 13). GP quality and outcomes framework indicator focus on the wrong issues. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, G., & Delbanco, S. (2007). Pay for performance: National perspective. 2006 longitudinal survey results with 2007 market updates. San Francisco: Med-Vantage.Google Scholar
  9. Biermann, A., & Clark, J. (2007). Performance measurement and equity. British Medical Journal, 334, 1333–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. BMA/NHS Employers. (2015). 2015/16 General Medical Services (GMS) contract Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Last accessed March 14, 2018, from
  11. Cacace, M. (2010). Das Gesundheitssystem der USA: Governance-Strukturen staatlicher und privater Akteure. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  12. Caley, M., Burn, S., Rouse, A., & Marshall, T. (2014). Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold in general practices in England: Impact of implementing government proposals. British Journal of General Practice, 64(618), e54–e59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, S., & Lester, H. (2011). Developing indicators and the concept of QOFability. In S. Gillam & A. N. Siriwardena (Eds.), The quality and outcomes framework QOF – Transforming general practice. Oxon: Radcliffe Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, S. M., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., & Roland, R. (2009). Effects of pay for performance on the quality of care in England. New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 368–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cannon, M. F. (2006). Pay for performance: Is Medicare a good candidate? Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, 7(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
  16. Carter, M. G., Jacobson, P. D., Kominski, G. F., et al. (1994). Use of diagnosis-related groups by non-Medicare payers. Health Care Financing Review, 16, 127–159.Google Scholar
  17. Casale, A. S., Paulus, R. A., Selna, M. J., Doll, M. C., Bothe, A. E., Jr., McKinley, K. E., Berry, S. A., Davis, D. E., Gilfillan, R. J., Hamory, B. H., & Steele, G. D., Jr. (2007). “ProvenCareSM”: A provider-driven pay-for-performance program for acute episodic cardiac surgical care. Annals of Surgery, 246(4), 613–621. discussion 621-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caveney, B. J. (2016). Pay-for-performance incentives: Holy grail or sippy cup? North Carolina Medical Journal, 77(4), 265–268. Scholar
  19. Chernew, M. (2010). Bundled payment systems: Can they be more successful this time. Health Services Research, 45(5), Part I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cleverley, W. O., Song, P. H., & Cleverley, J. O. (2010). Essentials of health care finance (7th ed.). Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar
  21. Collier, R. (2012). Professionalism: The importance of trust. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 184(13), 1455–1456. Scholar
  22. Conrad, D. A., & Perry, L. (2009). Quality-based financial incentives in healthcare: Can we improve quality by paying for it? Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Conrad, D. A., Maynard, C., Cheadle, A., et al. (1998). Primary care physician compensation method in medical groups. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cromwell, J., Trisolini, M. G., Pope, G. C., Mitchell, J. B., & Greenwald, L. M. (2011). Pay for performance in health care: Methods and approaches (RTI Press Publication No. BK-0002-1103). Research Triangle Park: RTI Press.Google Scholar
  25. Crow, R., Gage, H., Hampson, S., et al. (2002). The measurement of patient satisfaction with healthcare: Implications for practice from a systematic review of literature. Heath Technology Assessment, 6(32), 1–244.Google Scholar
  26. Cutler, D. M. (2015). Payment reform is about to become a reality. JAMA, 313(16), 1606–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cutler, D. M., Ilkmann, R. S., & Landrum, M. B. (2004). The role of information in medical markets: An analysis of publicly report outcomes in cardiac surgery. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 342–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Damberg, C., Raube, K., Williams, T., & Shortell, S. (2005). Paying for performance: Implementing a statewide project in California. Quality Management in Health Care, 14(2), 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Bruin, S. R., van Oostrom, S. H., Drewes, H. W., De Jong-van Til, J. T., Baan, C. A., & Struijs, J. N. (2013). Quality of diabetes care in Dutch care groups: No differences between diabetes patients with and without co-morbidity. International Journal of Integrated Care, 13, e057, published online: 23 December 2013.Google Scholar
  30. Donabedian, A. (2005). Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Milbank Quarterly, 83(4), 691–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Doran, T., Kontopantelis, E., Valderas, J. M., et al. (2011). Effect of financial incentives on incentivised and non-incentivised clinical activities: Longitudinal analysis of data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework. British Medical Journal, 342, d3590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Doran, et al. (2014). Targets in pay for performance programs: Lessons from QOF. BMJ, 348, g1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eijkenaar, F. (2012). Pay for performance in health care: An international overview of initiatives. Medical Care Research and Review, 69(3), 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eijkenaar, F., Emmert, M., Scheppach, M., & Schöffski, O. (2013). Effects of pay for performance in healthcare: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Health Policy, 110(2–3), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Emmert, M., & Schöffski, O. (2007). Public Reporting des kalifornischen “Pay for Performance” der Integrated Healthcare Association (IHA). Gesundheitswesen, 69, 438–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Faber, M., Bosch, M., Wollersheim, H., et al. (2009). Public reporting in health care: How do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review. Medical Care, 47, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fetter, R. B., Shin, Y., Freeman, J. L., et al. (1980). Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups. Medical Care, 18(Suppl), 1–53.Google Scholar
  38. Frisina, L., & Cacace, M. (2009). Chapter XII: DRGs and the professional independence of physicians. In A. Dwivedi (Ed.), Handbook of research on IT management and clinical data administration in healthcare (Vol. I, pp. 173–191). Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  39. Fung, C. H., Lim, Y., Mattke, S., et al. (2008). The evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gemmil, M. (2007). Pay-for-performance in the US: What lessons for Europe? Eurohealth, 13(4), 21–23.Google Scholar
  41. Geraedts, M., Auras, S., Hermeling, P., et al. (2009). Public Reporting – Formen und Effekte öffentlicher Qualitätsberichterstattung. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 134, 232–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gillam, S. J., & Siriwardena, A. N. (2011). The quality and outcomes framework: QOF – Transforming general practice. Oxon: Radcliffe.Google Scholar
  43. Gillam, S. J., Siriwardena, A. N., & Steel, N. (2012). Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: Impact of the quality and outcomes framework – A systematic review. Annals of Family Medicine, 10(5), 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gomes, M., Gutacker, N., Gojke, C., & Street, A. (2016). Addressing missing data in patient-reported outcome measured (PROMS): Implication for the use of PROMs for comparing provider performance. Health Economics, 25, 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gosden, T., Forland, F., Kristainsen, I. S., Sutton, M., Leese, B., Guiffrida, A., Sergison, M., & Pederson, L. (2000). Capitation, salary, fee-for-service and mixed systems payments: Effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD002215.Google Scholar
  46. Gothe, H., Köster, A. D., Storz, P., Nolting, H. D., & Häussler, B. (2007). Arbeits- und Berufzufriedenheit von Ärzten: Eine Übersicht der internationalen Literatur. Deutsches Arzteblatt, 104(20), A1394–A1399.Google Scholar
  47. Grumbach, K., Osmond, D., Vranizan, K., et al. (1998). Primary care physicians’ experience of financial incentives in managed-care systems. The New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1516–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Guterman, S., Davis, K., Schoenbaum, S., & Shih, A. (2009). Using Medicare payment policy to transform the health system: A framework for improving performance. Health Affairs, 28(2), w238–w250, published online 27 January 2009.Google Scholar
  49. Hasaart, F. (2011). Incentives in the diagnosis treatment combination payment system for specialists and hospitals in the Netherlands. University of Maastrcht.Google Scholar
  50. Hibbard, J. H. (2003). Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvements efforts? Health Affairs, 22(2), 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. IHA [Integrated Healthcare Association]. (2009). Transparency report on 2008 health plan payouts. Last accessed June 20, 2009, from
  52. InEK. (2016). Weiterentwicklung des G-DRG-Systems für das Jahr 2016. Last accessed July 21, 2016, from
  53. IOM [Institute of Medicine]. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  54. IOM [Institute of Medicine]. (2006a). Rewarding provider performance, aligning incentives in Medicare. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  55. IOM [Institute of Medicine]. (2006b). Performance measurement: Accelerating improvement (pathways to quality health care). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  56. Janus, K. (2003). Managing health care in private organizations. Transaction costs cooperation and modes of organization in the value chain. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  57. Klauber, J., Geradts, M., Friedrich, J., & Wasem, J. (2013). Krankenhaus-Report 2013- Schwerpunkt: Mengendynamik: Mehr Menge, mehr Nutzen? Stuttgart: Schattauer.Google Scholar
  58. Knight, W. (1998). Managed care. What it is and how it works. Gaithersburg: Aspen.Google Scholar
  59. Kongstvedt, P. R. (2001). Compensation of primary care physicians in open panel plans. In P. R. Kongstvedt (Ed.), The managed health care handbook (pp. 120–146). Gaithersburg: Aspen.Google Scholar
  60. Kongstvedt, P. R. (2013). Essentials of managed health care (6th ed.). Burlington, VT: Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar
  61. Kötter, T., Schaefer, F., Blozik, E., et al. (2011). Die Etwicklung von Qualitätsindikatoren – Hintergrund, Methoden und Probleme. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 105, 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Krauth, C., Liersch, S., Jensen, S., & Amelung, V. E. (2016). Would Germans opt for pay-for-performance programs? A willingness-to-accept experiment in a large general practitioners’ sample. Health Policy, 120(2), 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee, T. H. (2007). Pay for performance, version 2.0? The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(6), 531–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lee, M., Su, Z., Hou, Y., et al. (2011). A decision support system for diagnosis related groups coding. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3626–3631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lindenauer, P. K., Remus, D., Roman, S., et al. (2007). Public reporting und pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356, 486–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mannion, R., & Davies, H. (2008). Payment for performance in health care. British Medical Journal, 336, 306–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Markovitz, A. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2017). Pay-for-performance: Disappointing results or masked heterogeneity? Medical Care Research and Review, 75(1), 3–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Marshall, M. N., Romano, P. S., & Davies, H. T. O. (2004). How do we maximize the impact of the public reporting of quality of care? International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16, i57–i63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McDonald, R., & Roland, M. (2009). Pay for performance in primary care in England and California: Comparison of unintended consequences. Annals of Family Medicine, 7(2), 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mechanic, R. E., & Altman, S. H. (2009). Payment reform options: Episode payment is a good place to start. Health Affairs, 28(2), w262–w271, published online: 27 January 2009.Google Scholar
  71. OECD. (2016). Better ways to pay for healthcare, OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Qaseem, A. (2010). Pay for performance through the lens of medical professionalism. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152, 366–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Robinson, J. C. (2001). The end of managed care. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(20), 2622–2628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Robinson, J. C., & Casalino, L. P. (2001). Reevaluation of capitation contracting in New York and California. Health Affairs (Millwood), Suppl Web Exclusives, w11–w19.Google Scholar
  75. Roland, M., Elliott, M., Lyratzopoulos, G., et al. (2009). Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: Analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England. British Medical Journal, 339, b3851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rosenthal, M. B. (2008). Beyond pay for performance – Emerging models of provider-payment reform. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359(12), 1197–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rosenthal, M., & Dudley, R. (2007). Pay-for-performance, will the latest trend improve care? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(7), 740–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ryan, et al. (2014). Does winning a pay-for-performance bonus improve subsequent quality performance? Evidence from the hospital quality incentive demonstration. Health Services Research, 49(2), 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sanofi. (2015). Managed care digest series – HMO-PPO Digest 2015, Bridgewater.Google Scholar
  80. Schaeffer, D. (2006). Bedarf an Patienteninformationen über das Krankenhaus. Eine Literaturanalyse. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  81. Scheppach, M., Emmert, M., & Schöffski, O. (2011). Pay for Performance (P4P) im Gesundheitswesen: Leitfaden für eine erfolgreiche Einführung, Schriften zur Gesundheitsökonomie 19. Burgdorf: HERZ.Google Scholar
  82. Schneider, E. C., & Epstein, A. M. (1998). Use of public performance reports. A survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1638–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schwartz, L. M. (2005). How do elderly patients decide where to go for major surgery? Telephone interview survey. British Medical Journal, 331, 821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Scott, I. A., & Ward, M. (2006). Public reporting of hospital outcomes based on administrative data: Risks and opportunities. The Medical Journal of Australia, 184, 571–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sherry, T. B. (2016). A note on the comparative statics of pay-for-performance in health care. Health Economics, 25, 637–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shih, T., Chen, L. M., & Nallamothu, B. K. (2015). Will bundled payments change health care? Examining the evidence thus far in cardiovascular care. Circulation, 131(24), 2151–2158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Simpson, S. H., Eurich, D. T., Majumdar, S. R., et al. (2006). A meta-analysis of the association between adherence to drug therapy and mortality. British Medical Journal, 333(7557), 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Siva, I. (2010). Using the lessons of behavioral economics to design more effective pay-for-performance programs. American Journal of Managed Care, 16(7), 497–503.Google Scholar
  89. Smith, P. (1995). On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 18, 277–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stearns, S. C., Wolfe, B. L., & Kindig, D. A. (1992). Physician responses to fee-for-service and capitation payment. Inquiry, 29, 416–425.Google Scholar
  91. Struijs, J. N. (2015). How bundled health care payments are working in the Netherlands. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.Google Scholar
  92. Struijs, J. N., de Jong-van Til, J. T., Lemmens, L., Drewes, H. W., De Bruin, S. R., & Baan, C. A. (2012a). Three years of bundled payment for diabetes care in the Netherlands. Effect on health care delivery process and the quality of care. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. Bilthoven. Last accessed March 13, 2018, from
  93. Struijs, J. N., Mohnen, S. M., Molema, C. C. M., de Jong-van Til, J. T., & Baan, C. A. (2012b). Effects of bundled payment on curative health care costs in the Netherlands. An analysis for diabetes care and vascular sisk management based on nationwide claim date, 2007–2010. Bilhoven. Last accessed March 13, 2018, from
  94. Tanenbaum, S. J. (2009). Pay for performance in Medicare: Evidentiary irony and the politics of value. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 34, 717–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Underwood, H. (2007). Pay for performance: Value-based purchasing in healthcare. Presentation Health Spring Meeting – Session 25, Seattle, UA.Google Scholar
  96. Vaiana, M. E., & McGlynn, E. A. (2002). What cognitive science tells us about the design of reports for consumers. Medical Care Research and Review, 59, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Van Herck, P., De Smedt, D., Annemans, L., et al. (2010). Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Service Research, 10, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Webster, L. A. H., Gans, D. N., & Milburn, J. (2007). Financial management (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: MGMA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Volker Eric Amelung
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems ResearchHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Health Sciences Research INAV GmbHBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations