Advertisement

Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis with an All-Suture Anchor

  • Jacob M. Kirsch
  • Michael T. Freehill
Chapter

Abstract

The long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) is a common source of shoulder pain. Biceps tenodesis is a common strategy to address the LHBT. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis offers a unique advantage by removing all potentially diseased tissue from the bicipital groove, which may reduce the incidence of persistent pain. Furthermore, performing an in situ tenodesis may better restore the anatomic resting length and tension of the LHBT, thereby providing a more cosmetic result with a decreased likelihood of biceps cramping. All-suture anchors have recently been used for tenodesis fixation and benefit from a smaller osseous pilot hole, as well as, unicortical intramedullary fixation. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis offers reliable pain relief, high patient satisfaction rates, and low rates of complications.

Keywords

Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Suture anchor Proximal biceps Shoulder Long head of the biceps Pain 

References

  1. 1.
    Szabo I, Boileau P, Walch G. The proximal biceps as a pain generator and results of tenotomy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2008;16(3):180–6.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181824f1e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carr RM, Shishani Y, Gobezie R. How accurate are we in detecting biceps Tendinopathy? Clin Sports Med. 2016;35(1):47–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2015.08.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elser F, Braun S, Dewing CB, Giphart JE, Millett PJ. Anatomy, function, injuries, and treatment of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(4):581–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.10.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahrens PM, Boileau P. The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(8):1001–9.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper DE, Arnoczky SP, O’Brien SJ, Warren RF, DiCarlo E, Allen AA. Anatomy, histology, and vascularity of the glenoid labrum. An anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(1):46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vangsness CTJ, Jorgenson SS, Watson T, Johnson DL. The origin of the long head of the biceps from the scapula and glenoid labrum. An anatomical study of 100 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(6):951–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pal GP, Bhatt RH, Patel VS. Relationship between the tendon of the long head of biceps brachii and the glenoidal labrum in humans. Anat Rec. 1991;229(2):278–80.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092290215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng NM, Pan WR, Vally F, Le Roux CM, Richardson MD. The arterial supply of the long head of biceps tendon: anatomical study with implications for tendon rupture. Clin Anat. 2010;23(6):683–92.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20992.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alpantaki K, McLaughlin D, Karagogeos D, Hadjipavlou A, Kontakis G. Sympathetic and sensory neural elements in the tendon of the long head of the biceps. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(7):1580–3.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02840.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alpantaki K, Savvaki M, Karagogeos D. Expression of cell adhesion molecule L1 in the long head of biceps tendon. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-Grand). 2010;56(Suppl):OL1286–9.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nho SJ, Strauss EJ, Lenart BA, Provencher MT, Mazzocca AD, Verma NN, et al. Long head of the biceps tendinopathy: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(11):645–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones GL, Galluch DB. Clinical assessment of superior glenoid labral lesions: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:45–51.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802eb42a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McFarland EG, Tanaka MJ, Garzon-Muvdi J, Jia X, Petersen SA. Clinical and imaging assessment for superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2009;8(5):234–9.  https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181b7f042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor SA, Khair MM, Gulotta LV, Pearle AD, Baret NJ, Newman AM, et al. Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy fails to fully evaluate the biceps-labral complex. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(2):215–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Festa A, Allert J, Issa K, Tasto JP, Myer JJ. Visualization of the extra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps tendon during intra-articular shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(11):1413–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gilmer BB, DeMers AM, Guerrero D, Reid JB 3rd, Lubowitz JH, Guttmann D. Arthroscopic versus open comparison of long head of biceps tendon visualization and pathology in patients requiring tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(1):29–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moon SC, Cho NS, Rhee YG. Analysis of "hidden lesions" of the extra-articular biceps after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: the subpectoral portion as the optimal tenodesis site. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(1):63–8.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514554193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kelly AM, Drakos MC, Fealy S, Taylor SA, O’Brien SJ. Arthroscopic release of the long head of the biceps tendon: functional outcome and clinical results. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(2):208–13.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504269555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gill TJ, McIrvin E, Mair SD, Hawkins RJ. Results of biceps tenotomy for treatment of pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2001;10(3):247–9.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2001.114259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Slenker NR, Lawson K, Ciccotti MG, Dodson CC, Cohen SB. Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(4):576–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Friedman JL, FitzPatrick JL, Rylander LS, Bennett C, Vidal AF, McCarty EC. Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis in active patients younger than 55 years: is there a difference in strength and outcomes? Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(2):2325967115570848.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967115570848.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shang X, Chen J, Chen S. A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of the biceps tendon lesions. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0185788.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185788.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wittstein JR, Queen R, Abbey A, Toth A, Moorman CT. Isokinetic strength, endurance, and subjective outcomes after biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a postoperative study. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(4):857–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510387512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frost A, Zafar MS, Maffulli N. Tenotomy versus tenodesis in the management of pathologic lesions of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(4):828–33.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508322179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koh KH, Ahn JH, Kim SM, Yoo JC. Treatment of biceps tendon lesions in the setting of rotator cuff tears: prospective cohort study of tenotomy versus tenodesis. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(8):1584–90.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510364053.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang Q, Zhou J, Ge H, Cheng B. Tenotomy or tenodesis for long head biceps lesions in shoulders with reparable rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomised trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(2):464–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2587-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duff SJ, Campbell PT. Patient acceptance of long head of biceps brachii tenotomy. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21(1):61–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Nove-Josserand L, Neyton L, Szabo I. Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2005;14(3):238–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee HJ, Jeong JY, Kim CK, Kim YS. Surgical treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon with rotator cuff tear: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical results of tenotomy and tenodesis. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25(7):1107–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mazzocca AD, Cote MP, Arciero CL, Romeo AA, Arciero RA. Clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(10):1922–9.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508318192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hsu AR, Ghodadra NS, Provencher MT, Lewis PB, Bach BR. Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20(2):326–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boileau P, Baque F, Valerio L, Ahrens P, Chuinard C, Trojani C. Isolated arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis improves symptoms in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):747–57.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01097.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ge H, Zhang Q, Sun Y, Li J, Sun L, Cheng B. Tenotomy or tenodesis for the long head of biceps lesions in shoulders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0121286.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121286.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Millett PJ, Sanders B, Gobezie R, Braun S, Warner JJ. Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:121.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-121.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gombera MM, Kahlenberg CA, Nair R, Saltzman MD, Terry MA. All-arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(5):1077–83.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515570024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Werner BC, Pehlivan HC, Hart JM, Carson EW, Diduch DR, Miller MD, et al. Increased incidence of postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic compared with open biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(9):1075–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Werner BC, Brockmeier SF, Gwathmey FW. Trends in long head biceps tenodesis. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):570–8.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514560155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nho SJ, Reiff SN, Verma NN, Slabaugh MA, Mazzocca AD, Romeo AA. Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19(5):764–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.01.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Green JM, Getelman MH, Snyder SJ, Burns JP. All-arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii without the use of interference screws. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(1):19–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.07.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Werner BC, Lyons ML, Evans CL, Griffin JW, Hart JM, Miller MD, et al. Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of restoration of length-tension and mechanical strength between techniques. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(4):620–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Forsythe B ZW, Go BC, Lansdown D, Yanke AB, Verma NN, Romeo AA. Randomized prospective analysis of arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis. AAOS Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA. 2018.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dickens JF, Kilcoyne KG, Tintle SM, Giuliani J, Schaefer RA, Rue JP. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis: an anatomic study and evaluation of at-risk structures. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(10):2337–41.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512457654.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Euler SA, Smith SD, Williams BT, Dornan GJ, Millett PJ, Wijdicks CA. Biomechanical analysis of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: effect of screw malpositioning on proximal humeral strength. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(1):69–74.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514554563.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mellano CR, Frank RM, Shin JJ, Jain A, Zuke WA, Mascarenhas R, et al. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with PEEK interference screw: a biomechanical analysis of humeral fracture risk. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(3):806–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.09.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jarrett CD, McClelland WB Jr, Xerogeanes JW. Minimally invasive proximal biceps tenodesis: an anatomical study for optimal placement and safe surgical technique. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20(3):477–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lafosse L, Van Raebroeckx A, Brzoska R. A new technique to improve tissue grip: "the lasso-loop stitch". Arthroscopy. 2006;22(11):1246e1–3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Friedman DJ, Dunn JC, Higgins LD, Warner JJ. Proximal biceps tendon: injuries and management. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2008;16(3):162–9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0b013e318184f549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Said HG, Babaqi AA, Mohamadean A, Khater AH, Sobhy MH. Modified subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Int Orthop. 2014;38(5):1063–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2272-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kane P, Hsaio P, Tucker B, Freedman KB. Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: reliable treatment for all biceps tendon pathology. Orthopedics. 2015;38(1):37–41.  https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20150105-04.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Snir N, Hamula M, Wolfson T, Laible C, Sherman O. Long head of the biceps tenodesis with cortical button technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2013;2(2):e95–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2012.12.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mazzocca AD, Rios CG, Romeo AA, Arciero RA. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(7):896.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.04.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Su WR, Ling FY, Hong CK, Chang CH, Lin CL, Jou IM. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a new technique using an all-suture anchor fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(2):596–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3348-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Scully WF, Wilson DJ, Grassbaugh JA, Branstetter JG, Marchant BG, Arrington ED. A simple surgical technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a double-loaded suture anchor. Arthrosc Tech. 2013;2(2):e191–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2013.02.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Su WR, Budoff JE, Chiang CH, Lee CJ, Lin CL. Biomechanical study comparing biceps wedge tenodesis with other proximal long head of the biceps tenodesis techniques. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(9):1498–505.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.06.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Arora AS, Singh A, Koonce RC. Biomechanical evaluation of a unicortical button versus interference screw for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(4):638–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Patzer T, Santo G, Olender GD, Wellmann M, Hurschler C, Schofer MD. Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21(1):116–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sethi PM, Rajaram A, Beitzel K, Hackett TR, Chowaniec DM, Mazzocca AD. Biomechanical performance of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of interference screw fixation, cortical button fixation, and interference screw diameter. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(4):451–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tashjian RZ, Henninger HB. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(10):1408–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tan H, Wang D, Lebaschi AH, Hutchinson ID, Ying L, Deng XH, et al. Comparison of bone tunnel and cortical surface tendon-to-bone healing in a rabbit model of biceps tenodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(6):479–86.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.00797.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hong CK, Hsu KL, Kuan FC, Lin CL, Yeh ML, Su WR. Biomechanical evaluation of a transtendinous all-suture anchor technique versus interference screw technique for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy. 2018;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.007.
  61. 61.
    Chiang FL, Hong CK, Chang CH, Lin CL, Jou IM, Su WR. Biomechanical comparison of all-suture anchor fixation and interference screw technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(7):1247–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bernardoni ED FR, Shreya VS, Waterman BR, Shewman EF, Cole BJ, Romeo AA, Verma NN. Biomechanical analysis of all-suture suture-anchor fixation for biceps tenodesis. AAOS Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA. 2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAKOS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob M. Kirsch
    • 1
  • Michael T. Freehill
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.MedSport, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Sports Medicine and Shoulder SurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations