Advertisement

The Philosophy of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

  • Stephen S. Burkhart
  • Robert U. Hartzler
Chapter

Abstract

The philosophical considerations that have driven the evolution of rotator cuff surgery toward the arthroscopic approach have included the following: maximizing visualization, minimizing iatrogenic tissue damage, recognizing pathoanatomy correctly, and optimizing repair constructs. The arthroscope has allowed the surgeon to demonstrate rather than speculate about the reparability of radiographically intimidating tears and strive toward shoulder joint preservation over sacrifice in the absence of glenohumeral arthritis. These tenets have spurred a technical revolution over the last 25 years with great benefits for patients and surgeons. Alternatively, for surgeons who accept the burden of the craft of rotator cuff surgery, the arthroscope brings significant challenges in gaining mastery of novel and advanced techniques.

Keywords

Shoulder arthroscopy Rotator cuff repair Burden of craft Joint preservation Superior capsular reconstruction 

References

  1. 1.
    Ellman H. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a preliminary report. Paper presented at ASES 1st Open Meeting, Las Vegas. 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ellman H. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: analysis of one- to three-year results. Arthroscopy. 1987;3(3):173–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burkhart SS. Expanding the frontiers of shoulder arthroscopy. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20(2):183–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rockwood CA. Shoulder arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(5):639–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Denard PJ, Jiwani AZ, Lädermann A, Burkhart SS. Long-term outcome of a consecutive series of subscapularis tendon tears repaired arthroscopically. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(11):1587–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Denard PJ, Jiwani AZ, Lädermann A, Burkhart SS. Long-term outcome of arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repair: the importance of double-row fixation. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(7):909–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones CK, Savoie FH. Arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(6):564–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harreld KL, Puskas BL, Frankle MA. Massive rotator cuff tears without arthropathy: when to consider reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2012;61:143–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hartzler RU, Burkhart SS. Superior capsular reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2017;40(5):271–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burkhart SS, Nottage WM, Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Kohn HS, Pachelli A. Partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 1994;10(4):363–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Warner JJ. Management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: the role of tendon transfer. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:63–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burkhart SS, Barth JR, Richards DP, Zlatkin MB, Larsen M. Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with stage 3 and 4 fatty degeneration. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(4):347–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Denard PJ, Lädermann A, Brady PC, et al. Pseudoparalysis from a massive rotator cuff tear is reliably reversed with an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients without preoperative glenohumeral arthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(10):2373–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Denard PJ, Lädermann A, Jiwani AZ, Burkhart SS. Functional outcome after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears in individuals with pseudoparalysis. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(9):1214–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Werner CM, Steinmann PA, Gilbart M, Gerber C. Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(7):1476–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oh JH, Kim SH, Shin SH, Chung SW, Kim JY, Kim SJ. Outcome of rotator cuff repair in large-to-massive tear with pseudoparalysis: a comparative study with propensity score matching. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(7):1413–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sheean AJ, Hartzler RU, Denard PJ, et al. Preoperative radiographic risk factors for incomplete arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair in massive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2017;34(4):1121–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bond EC, Hunt L, Brick MJ, et al. Arthroscopic, open and mini-open approach for rotator cuff repair: no difference in pain or function at 24 months. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(1-2):50–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davidson J, Burkhart SS. The geometric classification of rotator cuff tears: a system linking tear pattern to treatment and prognosis. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(3):417–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Richards DP, Burkhart SS, Lo IK. Subscapularis tears: arthroscopic repair techniques. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003;34(4):485–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lo IK, Burkhart SS. Arthroscopic repair of massive, contracted, immobile rotator cuff tears using single and double interval slides: technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(1):22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lo IK, Burkhart SS. The interval slide in continuity: a method of mobilizing the anterosuperior rotator cuff without disrupting the tear margins. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(4):435–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burkhart SS, Cole BJ. Bridging self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair: we really are doing better. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(5):677–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burkhart SS, Denard PJ, Konicek J, Hanypsiak BT. Biomechanical validation of load-sharing rip-stop fixation for the repair of tissue-deficient rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(2):457–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Denard PJ, Burkhart SS. A load-sharing rip-stop fixation construct for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthrosc Tech. 2012;1(1):e37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAKOS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen S. Burkhart
    • 1
  • Robert U. Hartzler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryTSAOG Orthopaedics and Baylor College of MedicineSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations