Advertisement

Ankle Fractures and Return to Sports in Athletes: “Does Arthroscopy Add Value to the Treatment?”

  • Pieter D’HoogheEmail author
  • Fadi Bouri
  • Akis Eleftheriou
  • Thomas P. A. Baltes
  • Khalid Alkhelaifi
Chapter

Abstract

Although the incidence of fractures is low and accounts for less than 3% of all ankle injuries, ankle fractures constitute a major time-loss injury for athletes. Optimal management of ankle fractures should therefore address the demand for early and safe return to sport.

Open reduction and internal fixation has established itself as the standard of care in unstable ankle fractures. Depending on the fracture type, fracture stability provided by ORIF can allow for early rehabilitation and enable return to sport within 2–4 months. ORIF, however, is associated with substantial surgical exposure and inherent complications. Arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) and arthroscopic-assisted open reduction and internal fixation (AORIF) have been introduced to provide fracture stability and treat fracture-associated intra-articular injuries while minimizing surgical exposure and further optimizing outcomes and return to sport.

The aim of this chapter is to offer an evidence-based overview of the current literature regarding the indications for the use of arthroscopy in the treatment of acute ankle fractures and associated injuries in athletes.

Keywords

Ankle Fracture Arthroscopy Intra-articular Minimal invasive surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    FIFA F-MARC Football Medicine Manual 2nd Edition. Chapter 3: Ankle injuries. 2009. p. 154–60.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    d’Hooghe P, Kerkhoffs G. The ankle in football. Chapter 15 on ankle fractures. 2014. p. 159–186.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonasia DE, et al. The role of arthroscopy in the management of fractures about the ankle. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(4):226–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Labib S, Magill M, Slone H. Ankle arthroscopy for ankle fracture care. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;14(1):21–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hepple S, Guha A. The role of ankle arthroscopy in acute ankle injuries of the athlete. Foot Ankle Clin. 2013;18(2):185–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    d’Hooghe P, Wiegerinck JI, Tol JL, Landreau P. A 22-year-old professional soccer player with atraumatic ankle pain. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(24):1589–90, 1602-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colvin AC, et al. Return to sports following operatively treated ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(4):292–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Porter DA, et al. Functional outcome after operative treatment for ankle fractures in young athletes: a retrospective case series. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(9):887–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Donley BG, et al. Pronation-external rotation ankle fractures in 3 professional football players. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2005;34(11):547–50.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rossi F, Dragoni S. Talar body fatigue stress fractures: three cases observed in elite female gymnasts. Skelet Radiol. 2005;34(7):389–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Black KP, Ehlert KJ. A stress fracture of the lateral process of the talus in a runner. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(3):441–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Motto SG. Stress fracture of the lateral process of the talus – a case report. Br J Sports Med. 1993;27(4):275–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaeding CC, Yu JR, Wright R, Amendola A, Spindler KP. Management and return to play of stress fractures. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15(6):442–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glazebrook MA, Ganapathy V, Bridge MA, Stone JW, Allard JP. Evidence-based indications for ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(12):1478–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Imade S, et al. Leg anterior compartment syndrome following ankle arthroscopy after Maisonneuve fracture. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(2):215–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stufkens SA, et al. Long-term outcome after 1822 operatively treated ankle fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Injury. 2011;42(2):119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Takao M, Uchio Y, Naito K, Fukazawa I, Kakimaru T, Ochi M. Diagnosis and treatment of combined intra-articular disorders in acute distal fibular fractures. J Trauma. 2004;57(6):1303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loren GJ, Ferkel RD. Arthroscopic assessment of occult intra-articular injury in acute ankle fractures. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(4):412–21. Foot Ankle Int 2009;30(6):524–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(10):788–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lui TH, et al. Comparison of radiologic and arthroscopic diagnoses of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis disruption in acute ankle fracture. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(11):1370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oae K, Takao M, Naito K, et al. Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology. 2003;227(1):155–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Swart EF, Vosseller JT. Arthroscopic assessment of medial malleolar reduction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(9):1287–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chan KB, Lui TH. Role of ankle arthroscopy in management of acute ankle fracture. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(11):2373–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Turhan E, Doral MN, Demirel M, Atay AO, Bozkurt M, Bilge O, Huri G, Atesok K, Kaya D. Arthroscopy-assisted reduction versus open reduction in the fixation of medial malleolar fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23(8):953–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goost H, Wimmer MD, Barg A, Kabir K, Valderrabano V, Burger C. Fractures of the ankle joint: investigation and treatment options. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111(21):377–88.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ono A, Nishikawa S, Nagao A, et al. Arthroscopically assisted treatment of ankle fractures: arthroscopic findings and surgical outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(6):627–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Atesok K, Dorl MN, Whipple T, Mann G, Mei-Dan O, Atay OA, Beer Y, Lowe J, Soudry M, Schemitsch EH. Arthroscopy-assisted fracture fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(2):320–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leontaritis N, Hinojosa L, Panchbhavi VK. Arthroscopically detected intra-articular lesions associated with acute ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(2):333–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thordarson DB, et al. The role of ankle arthroscopy on the surgical management of ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(2):123–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Imade S, Takao M, Nishi H, Uchio Y. Unusual malleolar fracture of the ankle with talocalcaneal coalition treated by arthroscopy-assisted reduction and percutaneous fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(4):277–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Feng SM, Sun QQ, Wang AG, Li CK. “All-Inside” Arthroscopic treatment of Tillaux-Chaput fractures: clinical experience and outcomes analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57(1):56–9.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.07.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hammond AW, Crist BD. Arthroscopic management of C3 tibial plafond fractures: a technical guide. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(3):382–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Poyanli O, Esenkaya I, Ozkut AT, Akcal MA, Akan K, Unay K. Minimally invasive reduction technique in split depression type tibial pilon fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(2):254–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cuttica DJ, Smith WB, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: predictors of clinical outcome. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(11):1045–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Choi WJ, Park KK, Kim BS, Lee JW. Osteochondral lesion of the talus: is there a critical defect size for poor outcome? Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):1974–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Aurich M, Bedi HS, Smith PJ, Rolauffs B, Mückley T, Clayton J, Blackney M. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle with matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation: early clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(2):311–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Elias I, Raikin SM, Schweitzer ME, Besser MP, Morrison WB, Zoga AC. Osteochondral lesions of the distal tibial plafond: localization and morphologic characteristics with an anatomical grid. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(6):524–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mologne TS, Ferkel RD. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the distal tibia. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(8):865–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Giannini S, Buda R, Ruffilli A, Cavallo M, Pagliazzi G, Bulzamini MC, Desando G, Luciani D, Vannini F. Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in the ankle joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(6):1311–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Giannini S, Buda R, Vannini F, Di Caprio F, Grigolo B. Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in osteochondral lesions of the talus: surgical technique and results. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(5):873–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gonzalez TA, Macaulay AA, Ehrlichman LK, Drummond R, Mittal V, DiGiovanni CW. Arthroscopically assisted versus standard open reduction and internal fixation techniques for the acute ankle fracture. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(5):554–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vogl TJ, Hochmuth K, Diebold T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of acute injured distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Investig Radiol. 1997;32(7):401–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Utsugi K, Sakai H, Hiraoka H, Yashiki M, Mogi H. Intra-articular fibrous tissue formation following ankle fracture: the significance of arthroscopic debridement of fibrous tissue. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(1):89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mitev K, Mladenovski S, Kaftandziev I. Posttraumatic soft tissue impingement of the ankle: arthroscopic findings and surgical outcomes. Prilozi. 2014;35(1):237–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sri-Ram K, Robinson AH. Arthroscopic assessment of the syndesmosis following ankle fracture. Injury. 2005;36(5):675–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Takao M, et al. Arthroscopic diagnosis of tibiofibular syndesmosis disruption. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(8):836–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Saltzman CL, Marsh JL, Tearse DS. Treatment of displaced talus fractures: an arthroscopically assisted approach. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(11):630–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Subairy A, Subramanian K, Geary NP. Arthroscopically assisted internal fixation of a talus body fracture. Injury. 2004;35(1):104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sitte W, Lampert C, Baumann P. Osteosynthesis of talar body shear fractures assisted by hindfoot and subtalar arthroscopy: technique tip. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(1):74–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Motto SG. Stress fracture of the talar body. Clin J Sport Med. 1996;6(4):278–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hontas MJ, Haddad RJ, Schlesinger LC. Conditions of the talus in the runner. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14(6):486–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Fitzgerald RH, Kaufer H, Malkani AL. Potter, Mosby, McCance K. Orthopaedics. Mosby: Elsevier; 2008.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mulfinger GL, Trueta J. The blood supply of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1970;52(1):160–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Travlos J, Learmonth ID. Bilateral avascular necrosis of the talus following strenuous physical activity. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1991;73(5):863–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hawkins LG. Fractures of the neck of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(5):991–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Metzger MJ, Levin JS, Clancy JT. Talar neck fractures and rates of avascular necrosis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1999;38(2):154–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    van Dijk CN, Scholten PE, Krips R. A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:871–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    van Dijk CN, de Leeuw PA, Scholten PE. Hindfoot endoscopy for posterior ankle impingement: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 2):287–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    van Dijk CN. Hindfoot endoscopy. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11:391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Perera A, Baker JF, Lui DF, Stephens MM. The management and outcome of lateral process fracture of the talus. Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;16(1):15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kim HN, Park YJ, Kim GL, Park YW. Arthroscopy combined with hardware removal for chronic pain after ankle fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(6):1427–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Donken CC, et al. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating ankle fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:CD008470.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Walsh WM, Hughston JC. Unstable ankle fractures in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1976;4(4):173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Oztekin HH, et al. Foot and ankle injuries and time lost from play in professional soccer players. Foot (Edinb). 2009;19(1):22–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAKOS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pieter D’Hooghe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fadi Bouri
    • 1
  • Akis Eleftheriou
    • 2
  • Thomas P. A. Baltes
    • 1
  • Khalid Alkhelaifi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine HospitalDohaQatar
  2. 2.Hippocrateon Private HospitalNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations