Advertisement

Verschwörungstheorien

  • Markus AppelEmail author
  • Sarah Mehretab
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

„Hinter dem Anschlag auf das World Trade Center – 9/11 – steckt der israelische Geheimdienst Mossad und die amerikanische Regierung wusste Bescheid.“

Literatur

  1. Bale, J. M. (2007). Political paranoia v. political realism: On distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics. Patterns of Prejudice, 41, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilewicz, M., Winiewski, M., Kofta, M., & Wójcik, A. (2013). Harmful ideas, the structure and consequences of anti-semitic beliefs in Poland. Political Psychology, 34, 821–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bogart, L. M., Wagner, G., Galvan, F. H., & Banks, D. (2010). Conspiracy beliefs about HIV are related to antiretroviral treatment nonadherence among African American men with HIV. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 53, 648–655.Google Scholar
  4. Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 538–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grzesiak-Feldman, M. (2013). The effect of high-anxiety situations on conspiracy thinking. Current Psychology, 32, 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 88–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Imhoff, R., Lamberty, P., & Klein, O. (2018). Using power as a negative cue: How conspiracy mentality affects epistemic trust in sources of historical knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1364–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine, 28, 1709–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lamberty, P., & Imhoff, R. (2018). Powerful pharma and its marginalized alternatives? Effects of individual differences in conspiracy mentality on attitudes toward medical approaches. Social Psychology, 49, 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lamberty, P. K., Hellmann, J. H., & Oeberst, A. (2018). The winner knew it all? Conspiracy beliefs and hindsight perspective after the 2016 US general election. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 236–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing-therefore (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, 622–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 952–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schuler, J. (2017). Wo die Welt noch in Ordnung ist. Von politischen Fundis und VerschwörungstheoretikerInnen. In-Mind. http://de.in-mind.org/blog/post/wo-die-welt-noch-in-ordnung-ist-von-politischen-fundis-und-verschwoerungstheoretikerinnen.
  19. Schultz, T., Jackob, N., Ziegele, M., Quiring, O., & Schemer, C. (2017). Erosion des Vertrauens? Misstrauen, Verschwörungstheorien und Kritik an den Medien in der deutschen Bevölkerung. Media Perspektiven, 5(2017), 246–259.Google Scholar
  20. Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 434–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 202–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Swami, V. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2014). Political paranoia and conspiracy theories. In J.-W. van Prooijen & P. A. M. van Lange (Hrsg.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (S. 218–236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133, 572–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Kommunikationspsychologie und Neue MedienUniversität WürzburgWürzburgDeutschland
  2. 2.WürzburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations