Advertisement

The Ultra-Long-Distance Energy Transmission Case—The Impact of Contract on a Public-Private Research Network

  • Carsten MorgenrothEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Two universities and two commercial enterprises engage in a joint endeavor subject to a new line of federal public funding. Viewing X University, transfer manager Melanie McCormack and Head of Legal Department Dr. Stan Benshaw take up the task of creating factual and legal structures for X University’s part of the project. In such a public-private project, management needs to work differently: with decision-making bound to the Rule of Law, with additional law that must be considered and with the constitutional right to scientific action working in many directions, processes and internal structures will most likely be very different compared to those found in the private economy. Accordingly, this case study conveys that Contractual Management (CM) tools will only have a limited effect on managing the project for several reasons: CM terminology like Knowledge Management or Management of Transaction can’t be fully applied since these activities are widely spread out across university structures; scientists follow other interests than employees and exercise a different freedom in finding and executing their work; and Universities don’t primarily pursue commercial, but primarily reputational interests. Yet, certain elements of management, like communication terminology, could be introduced in the contract to bring it closer to serving as the primary tool for steering the project.

References

  1. 1.
    Braun, J. (2011). Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft (4th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Partington, M. (2018). Introduction to the English legal system (13th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis—New public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria and Germany. In D. Jansen (Ed.), New forms of governance in research organizations (pp. 137 et seq.). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Langenfeld, G. (1997). Vertragsgestaltung (2nd ed.). Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chitty, J. (1999). Chitty on contracts, volume I—General principles (28th ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ulmer, P., & Schäfer, C., (2013). Prior to §§ 705 et seq. In Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Schuldrecht Besonderer Teil, Volume III (6th ed.). Beck: Munich.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosenberger, H.-P. (2006). Verträge über Forschung und Entwicklung. Cologne: Carl Heymanns.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lunney, M., Nolan, D., & Oliphant, K. (2017). Tort law (6th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (2019). Sample agreements for research and development cooperation. Guidelines for cooperations between academic institutions and industry. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/sample-agreements-for-research-and-development-cooperation.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations