Advertisement

How to Navigate a Scientific Meeting and Make It Worthwhile? A Guide for Young Orthopedic Surgeons

  • Darren de SA
  • Jayson Lian
  • Conor I. Murphy
  • Ravi Vaswani
  • Volker MusahlEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Scientific meetings provide a unique opportunity within the academic and professional orthopedic community to further education, explore intellectual interests, share knowledge, network with colleagues, and find a welcomed reprieve from the hustle of clinical duties to revel in the company of like-minded individuals. Conscientious preparation and planning are indispensable leading up to the meeting in order to maximize utility and time. Understanding available resources and specific events encompassed within the meeting such as abstract presentations, poster tours, small-group “breakout” sessions, panel discussions, vendor exhibitions, and technical demonstrations and knowing how to make the best use of them demand its own research and execution of a “preoperative plan.” At the conclusion of these meetings, attendees should feel a rejuvenated spirit stemming from intellectual vivification, rekindling of old relationships, and forging of new ones. These efforts and takeaways then form the basis for future academic pursuits, research collaboration, and excitement for the next opportunity to partake in similar meetings.

Keywords

Scientific meeting Networking Junior learner Roundtable Breakout session Panel discussion Symposium Podium presentation Instructional course lecture Vendor 

Notes

Glossary of Meeting-Specific Terms

Scientific meeting

Academic gathering of scientific professionals to discuss research and specialty-specific topics.

Networking

Forming connections between professionals that are typically used for future collaborations.

Junior learner

A young student or physician who attends meetings to expand his/her knowledge and form new relationships.

Roundtable

Conversation among experts typically regarding a topic.

Breakout session

Short session where a group of attendees discusses a central topic among each other.

Panel discussions

A small cohort of experts discussing a topic of interest in front of a large audience.

Symposium

A formal discussion among experts in the field regarding a specific topic.

Podium presentation

Formal exhibition of a noteworthy research study, typically given in front of an audience.

Instructional course lecture (ICL)

An up-to-date educational series, given by a panel of experts, on a specific topic and/or procedure.

Vendor

Medical equipment supplier companies present at medical conferences to advertise their product and negotiate partnerships with physicians and medical researchers.

References

  1. 1.
    Borgmann H, DeWitt S, Tsaur I, Haferkamp A, Loeb S. Novel survey disseminated through Twitter supports its utility for networking, disseminating research, advocacy, clinical practice and other professional goals. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(9-10):E713–7.  https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bostic JQ. Practice makes permanent (not necessarily perfect). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;55(9):749–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.06.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowman J, Mogensen L, Marsland E, Lannin N. The development, content validity and inter-rater reliability of the SMART-goal evaluation method: a standardised method for evaluating clinical goals. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62(6):420–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brick CA, Seely DL, Palermo TM. Association between sleep hygiene and sleep quality in medical students. Behav Sleep Med. 2010;8(2):113–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15402001003622925.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Devlin R. Value of networking. Emerg Nurse. 2016;24(7):17.  https://doi.org/10.7748/en.24.7.17.s23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flacco ME, Manzoli L, Boccia S, Capasso L, Aleksovska K, Rosso A, Scaioli G, De Vito C, Siliquini R, Villari P, Ioannidis JP. Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(7):811–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kay J, Memon M, de Sa D, Duong A, Simunovic N, Athwal GS, Ayeni OR. Five-year publication rate of clinical presentations at the open and closed American shoulder and elbow surgeons annual meeting from 2005-2010. J Exp Orthop. 2016;3(1):21.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0059-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kay J, Memon M, de Sa D, Duong A, Simunovic N, Ayeni OR. Does the level of evidence of paper presentations at the Arthroscopy Association of North America annual meetings from 2006-2010 correlate with the 5-year publication rate or the impact factor of the publishing journal? Arthroscopy. 2017;33(1):12–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kay J, Memon M, Rogozinsky J, de Sa D, Simunovic N, Seil R, Karlsson J, Ayeni OR. The rate of publication of free papers at the 2008 and 2010 European Society of Sports Traumatology Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy Congresses. J Exp Orthop. 2017;4(1):15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-017-0090-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lander ST, Sanders JO, Cook PC, O’Malley NT. Social media in pediatric orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017;37(7):e436–9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001032.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maloney S, Tunnecliff J, Morgan P, Gaida J, Keating J, Clearihan L, Sadasivan S, Ganesh S, Mohanty P, Weiner J, Rivers G, Ilic D. Continuing professional development via social media or conference attendance: a cost analysis. JMIR Med Educ. 2017;3(1):e5.  https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.6357.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Porter ME, Lee TH. From volume to value in health care: the work begins. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1047–8.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.11698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramnanan CJ, Pound LD. Advances in medical education and practice: student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:63–73.  https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S109037.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Randviir EP, Illingworth SM, Baker MJ, Cude M, Banks CE. Twittering about research: a case study of the World’s first twitter poster competition. F1000Res. 2015;4:798.  https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6992.3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ritchie A. How to network with fellow physicians to land the job you want. Med Econ. 2013. http://www.medicaleconomics.com/modern-medicine-feature-articles/how-network-fellow-physicians-land-jobyou-want.
  16. 16.
    Robinson R. The art of the elevator pitch: 4 tips for making an impression. Forbes. 2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanrobinson/2017/09/05/elevator-pitch-tips-making-impression/.
  17. 17.
    Saperstein AK, Lennon RP, Olsen C, Womble L, Saguil A. Information retention among attendees at a traditional poster presentation session. Acta Med Acad. 2016;45(2):180–1.  https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sculco PK, McLawhorn AS, Fehring KA, De Martino I. The future of social media in orthopedic surgery. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(2):278–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9412-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sohn E. Networking: Hello, stranger. Nature. 2015;526(7575):729–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sumrein BO, Huttunen TT, Launonen AP, Berg HE, Felländer-Tsai L, Mattila VM. Proximal humeral fractures in Sweden-a registry-based study. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(3):901–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3808-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Torre D, Manca A, Durning S, Janczukowicz J, Taylor D, Cleland J. Learning at large conferences: from the ‘sage on the stage’ to contemporary models of learning. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(3):205–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0351-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wong LR, Flynn-Evans E, Ruskin KJ. Fatigue risk management: the impact of Anesthesiology Residents’ work schedules on job performance and a review of potential countermeasures. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(4):1340–8.  https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002548.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAKOS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren de SA
    • 1
  • Jayson Lian
    • 2
  • Conor I. Murphy
    • 1
  • Ravi Vaswani
    • 1
  • Volker Musahl
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations