Advertisement

A Clinical Practice Guideline

  • Aleksei Dingel
  • Jayson Murray
  • James Carey
  • Deborah Cummins
  • Kevin SheaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

After extensive inquiry and backlash against the historic recommendation-based clinical practice guidelines, the Institute of Medicine, and others, called for a revision of the recommendation-based clinical practice guidelines. The new guidelines were to be evidence-based. A rigorous rubric was created to standardize the development process of future clinical practice guidelines. These evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are designed to stand certain scrutiny their recommendation-based predecessors could not, improve the quality of health care, decrease inefficiencies, and reduce practice variation. Through the extensive and deliberate analysis of high-quality medical literature, clinical practice guidelines provide evidence-supported health-care plans for physicians and patients alike. As clinical practice guidelines serve as a summary of scientific evidence available, those areas which lack adequate clinical research may become research priority.

Keywords

Clinical practice guidelines CPGs Evidence-based Systematic review 

References

  1. 1.
    Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC; 2011.  https://doi.org/10.17226/13058.
  2. 2.
    Shea KG, Sink EL, Jacobs JC Jr. Clinical practice guidelines and guideline development. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(Suppl 2):S95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC; 2001.  https://doi.org/10.17226/10027.
  4. 4.
    Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN, Robertson P, Department of Otolaryngology State University of New York. Clinical practice guideline development manual, third edition: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148:S1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Foundation TRWJ. Chronic care in America: the 21st century challenge. 1996. http://www.rwjf.org/library/chrcare/. Accessed 19 Sept 2000.
  6. 6.
    Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA. 1998;280:1000–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooke CR, Gould MK. Advancing clinical practice and policy through guidelines: the role of the American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:910–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffman C, Rice D, Sung HY. Persons with chronic conditions. Their prevalence and costs. JAMA. 1996;276:1473–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerteis J. Multiple chronic conditions Chartbook: 2010 medical expenditure panel survey data. 2014. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/desicion/mcc/mccchartbook.pdf.
  10. 10.
    Hempstead K. The real killer is still out there: update on health care spending. 2017. http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2017/08/the-real-killer-is-still-out-there-update-on-health-care-spending.html.
  11. 11.
    Roehrig C. The health SPending slowdown for 2008–2013: implications for sustainability. 2017. http://altarum.org/sites/default/files/uploaded-related-files/11_Roehrig%20Symposium%20July%2018%202017%20FINAL.pdf.
  12. 12.
    Centers for Disease Control. Arthritis—National Statistics. 2017. Located at: CDC.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Association PIaAH. Quality and patient safety. 2006. http://aha.org/advocacy-issues/quality/background/shtml.
  14. 14.
    AAOS. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Als-Nielsen B, Chen W, Gluud C, Kjaergard LL. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? JAMA. 2003;290:921–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289:454–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riaz H, Raza S, Khan MS, Riaz IB, Krasuski RA. Impact of funding source on clinical trial results including cardiovascular outcome trials. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:1944–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gagnon A. Corporate influence over clinical research: considering the alternatives. Prescrire Int. 2012;21:191–4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:252–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shea KGMC, Quinn R, Beckmann JT. Evidence based quality and outcomes assessment in Pediatric Orthopedics. Rosemont, IL: AAOS; 2016.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jevsevar D, Shea K, Cummins D, Murray J, Sanders J. Recent changes in the AAOS evidence-based clinical practice guidelines process. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1740–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. AAOS Introductory Packet for Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG)/Systematic Review (SR) Work Group Members. 2015:31.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    AAOS. Guideline peer review and public responses. https://www.aaos.org/guidelinepeerreview/?ssopc=1. Accessed 20 Nov 2017.
  25. 25.
    Waters E. Evidence for public health decision-making: towards reliable synthesis. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87:164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shekelle P, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Woolf SH. When should clinical guidelines be updated? BMJ. 2001;323:155–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Located at: Clinical Practice Guidelines. 2015.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kevin G Shea CTP. Turning a CPG into a care map. 2016. https://www.aaos.org/AAOSNow/2016/Oct/Research/research03/. Accessed 14 Nov 2017.
  29. 29.
    AAOS. DDH Care Map-Diagnoses and Referral Pathway. 2016. http://hipdysplasia.org/diagnosis-and-referral-pathway/.

Copyright information

© ISAKOS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksei Dingel
    • 1
  • Jayson Murray
    • 2
  • James Carey
    • 3
  • Deborah Cummins
    • 2
  • Kevin Shea
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryStanford University Medical CenterStanfordUSA
  2. 2.American Academy for Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS)NorridgeUSA
  3. 3.Pennsylvania HospitalPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations