Advertisement

Basics of Outcome Assessment in Clinical Research

  • Monique C. Chambers
  • Sarah M. Tepe
  • Lorraine A. T. Boakye
  • MaCalus V. HoganEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The tracking of clinical outcomes allows healthcare organizations to identify variations in the delivery of care in order to properly align healthcare practices within an organization. An outcome measure is the result of a test that is used to objectively determine the baseline function of a patient at the beginning of treatment. The most useful outcomes should be measurable based on discrete parameters and time points. Outcomes in healthcare are no longer solely limited to the quality of care provided but also reflect the service as experienced by the patient. Self-reported outcome measures were developed to gather information based on patient experience and perception. Patient-reported outcomes create an environment that fosters shared decision-making. Decisions made with patient input often make the patient feel more at ease because he or she can converse with a clinician about the treatment. With clinical implications at the forefront of outcome research study design, researchers are better equipped to develop the right questions and collect the appropriate data to address the root cause of differences in patient outcomes.

Keywords

Clinical outcomes Patient-reported outcomes Clinical assessment Outcome measures 

References

  1. 1.
    AAOS. Principles of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) reporting: information statement. 2015. https://aaos.org/uploadedFiles/PreProduction/About/Opinion_Statements/advistmt/1044%20Principles%20of%20Patient%20Reported%20Outcome%20Measures%20(PROMs)%20Reporting.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2017.
  2. 2.
    Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ. The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ. 2010;340:c186.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fautrel B, Alten R, Kirkham B, de la Torre I, Durand F, Barry J, et al. Call for action: how to improve use of patient-reported outcomes to guide clinical decision making in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int;2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4005-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferguson C, Rocha JL, Lalli T, Irrgang JJ, Hurwitz S, Hogan MV. Developing performance and assessment platforms in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(6):670–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Health Services Research Information Central. Comparative effectiveness research. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/hsrinfo/cer.html. Accessed 21 Mar 2018.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    MOTION Group. Current concepts review: patient-reported outcomes in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:436–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, Chenok KE, Bohm E, Bozic KJ, et al. Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(Suppl 3):66–71.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01021.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Segal C, Holve E, Sabharwal R. Collecting and using patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for comparative effectiveness research (CER) and patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR): challenges and opportunities. 2013. http://www.academyhealth.org/files/Collecting%20and%20Using%20PRO%20for%20CER%20and%20PCOR.pdf.
  10. 10.
    Selecting the Right Measures for Your Report. Agency for healthcare research and quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/talkingquality/create/gather/index.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2018.
  11. 11.
    Slutsky J, Atkins D, Chang S, et al. Comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health care program. In: Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews [Internet]. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smythe L, Giddings LS. From experience to definition: addressing the question: “what is qualitative research?”. Nurs Prax N Z. 2007;23:37–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tinker A. The top 7 outcome measures and 3 measurement essentials. HealthCatalyst. https://www.healthcatalyst.com/The-Top-7-Outcome-Measures-and-3-Measurement-Essentials. Accessed 17 Feb 2008.
  14. 14.
    Understanding Data Sources. Agency for healthcare research and quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patientsafety/talkingquality/create/understand.html. Accessed 21 March 2018.
  15. 15.
    US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: electronic source data in clinical investigations. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm328691.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2018.
  16. 16.
    Wang S, Hsu CJ, Trent L, Ryan T, Kearns NT, Civillico EF, et al. Evaluation of performance-based outcome measures for the upper limb: a systematic review. PM&R. 2018;10(9):951–962.e3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISAKOS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monique C. Chambers
    • 1
  • Sarah M. Tepe
    • 2
  • Lorraine A. T. Boakye
    • 2
  • MaCalus V. Hogan
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Foot and Ankle Injury Research [F.A.I.R] Group, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations