Advertisement

Bracket Induction for Lambek Calculus with Bracket Modalities

  • Glyn Morrill
  • Stepan Kuznetsov
  • Max Kanovich
  • Andre Scedrov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10950)

Abstract

Relativisation involves dependencies which, although unbounded, are constrained with respect to certain island domains. The Lambek calculus L can provide a very rudimentary account of relativisation limited to unbounded peripheral extraction; the Lambek calculus with bracket modalities Lb can further condition this account according to island domains. However in naïve parsing/theorem-proving by backward chaining sequent proof search for Lb the bracketed island domains, which can be indefinitely nested, have to be specified in the linguistic input. In realistic parsing word order is given but such hierarchical bracketing structure cannot be assumed to be given. In this paper we show how parsing can be realised which induces the bracketing structure in backward chaining sequent proof search with Lb.

Keywords

Lambek calculus with brackets Bracket induction Categorial grammar 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous referees for their thoughtful comments and questions.

The research of Morrill was supported by the grant TIN2017-89244-R from MINECO (Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad). Glyn Morrill is also grateful to the University of Pennsylvania for support during his visit in February 2017. Kuznetsov’s research towards this paper was supported by the Young Russian Mathematics award, by the Program of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences No. 01 ‘Fundamental Mathematics and its Applications’ under grant PRAS-18-01, and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research under grant 18-01-00822. Stepan Kuznetsov is also grateful to the University of Pennsylvania for support during his visit in April–May 2018, when the final version of this paper was prepared. Max Kanovich is grateful to the University of Pennsylvania for support during his visit in February 2017. The participation of Kanovich, Kuznetsov, and Scedrov in the preparation of this article was within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of a subsidy by the Russian Academic Excellence Project ‘5-100’.

References

  1. 1.
    Andreoli, J.M.: Logic programming with focusing in linear logic. J. Log. Comput. 2(3), 297–347 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Benthem, J.: Language in Action: Categories, Lambdas, and Dynamic Logic. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, No. 130. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1991). Revised student edition printed in 1995 by the MIT PresszbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Girard, J.Y.: Linear logic. Theor. Comput. Sci. 50, 1–102 (1987).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(87)90045-4MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanazawa, M.: The Lambek calculus enriched with additional connectives. J. Log. Lang. Inf. 1, 141–171 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171695MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kanovich, M., Kuznetsov, S., Morrill, G., Scedrov, A.: A polynomial-time algorithm for the Lambek calculus with brackets of bounded order. In: Miller, D. (ed.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs, vol. 84, pp. 22:1–22:17. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl Publishing, Germany (2017).  https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.22, http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2017/7738/
  6. 6.
    Kanovich, M., Kuznetsov, S., Nigam, V., Scedrov, A.: A logical framework with commutative and non-commutative subexponentials. In: Automated Reasoning: Proceedings of IJCAR 2018. Springer (2018, to appear)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kanovich, M., Kuznetsov, S., Scedrov, A.: Undecidability of the Lambek calculus with subexponential and bracket modalities. In: Klasing, R., Zeitoun, M. (eds.) FCT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10472, pp. 326–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55751-8_26CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuznetsov, S., Morrill, G., Valentín, O.: Count-invariance including exponentials. In: Kanazawa, M., de Groote, P., Sadrzadeh, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th Meeting on the Mathematics of Language, pp. 128–139. Association for Computational Linguistics, London (2017). https://aclweb.org/anthology/W/W17/W17-3413.pdf
  9. 9.
    Lambek, J.: The mathematics of sentence structure. Am. Math. Mon. 65, 154–170 (1958)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller, D., Saurin, A.: From proofs to focused proofs: a modular proof of focalization in linear logic. In: Duparc, J., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) CSL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4646, pp. 405–419. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74915-8_31CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moortgat, M.: Multimodal linguistic inference. J. Log. Lang. Inf. 5(3, 4), 349–385 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00159344MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moortgat, M.: Categorial type logics. In: van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 93–177. Elsevier Science B.V. and MIT Press, Amsterdam and Cambridge (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morrill, G.: Categorial formalisation of relativisation: pied piping, islands, and extraction sites. Technical report. LSI-92-23-R, Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morrill, G.: Grammar logicised: relativisation. Linguist. Philos. 40(2), 119–163 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-016-9197-0MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morrill, G.: Parsing logical grammar: CatLog3. In: Loukanova, R., Liefke, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Logic and Algorithms in Computational Linguistics 2017, LACompLing 2017, pp. 107–131. DiVA, Stockholm University (2017). http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1140018/FULLTEXT03.pdf
  16. 16.
    Morrill, G., Valentín, O.: Displacement calculus. Linguist. Anal. 36(1–4), 167–192 (2010). arXiv:1004.4181, special issue Festschrift for J. LambekGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morrill, G., Valentín, O.: Computational coverage of TLG: nonlinearity. In: Kanazawa, M., Moss, L., de Paiva, V. (eds.) Proceedings of Third Workshop on Natural Language and Computer Science, NLCS 2015, vol. 32, pp. 51–63. EPiC, Kyoto (2015). Workshop Affiliated with Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP) and Logic in Computer Science (LICS)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morrill, G., Valentín, O.: Multiplicative-additive focusing for parsing as deduction. In: Cervesato, I., Schürmann, C. (eds.) First International Workshop on Focusing, Workshop Affiliated with LPAR 2015, pp. 29–54. EPTCS, No. 197, Suva, Fiji (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morrill, G., Valentín, O., Fadda, M.: The displacement calculus. J. Log. Lang. Inf. 20(1), 1–48 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-010-9129-2MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morrill, G.V.: Categorial Grammar: Logical Syntax, Semantics, and Processing. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pentus, M.: A polynomial-time algorithm for Lambek grammars of bounded order. Linguist. Anal. 36(1–4), 44–471 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pentus, M.: Lambek calculus is NP-complete. Theor. Comput. Sci. 357(1), 186–201 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2006.03.018MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Valentín, O., Serret, D., Morrill, G.: A count invariant for Lambek calculus with additives and bracket modalities. In: Morrill, G., Nederhof, M.-J. (eds.) FG 2012-2013. LNCS, vol. 8036, pp. 263–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39998-5_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glyn Morrill
    • 1
  • Stepan Kuznetsov
    • 2
    • 5
  • Max Kanovich
    • 3
    • 5
  • Andre Scedrov
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Universitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Steklov Mathematical Institute of the RASMoscowRussia
  3. 3.University College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  5. 5.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations