Advertisement

Ermittlung der Händigkeit

  • Elke KrausEmail author
  • Theresa Allweiss
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die Ermittlung der Händigkeit ist aufgrund ihrer unterschiedlichen Definitionen und ihrer Multidimensionalität eine große Herausforderung für Forscher und Praktiker. Die zahlreichen Studien zur Händigkeit zeigen fast ebenso zahlreiche Verfahren zur Austestung derselben. Viele begrenzen Händigkeit auf eine Dimension, meist Handpräferenz, und nutzen entweder Selbsteinschätzungs- oder Fremdeinschätzungsverfahren. Einige setzen Beobachtung bei durchgeführten Handlungen ein, und wenige ermitteln Handpräferenz und Handleistung. Einige Forscher befassen sich mit dem Ausprägungsgrad und berücksichtigen die Beständigkeit der Handlungen, wenige unterscheiden zwischen unimanuellen und bimanuellen Aktionen oder zwischen Handpräferenz und dem Überkreuzen der Körpermitte. Zuletzt gibt es auch eine große Vielfalt an Klassifikationsansätzen, mit denen eine Links- oder Rechtshändigkeit bestimmt wird. In diesem Kapitel setzen wir uns mit diesen Herausforderungen der Händigkeitsermittlung auseinander.

Literatur

  1. Adamo, D. E., & Martin, B. J. (2009). Position sense asymmetry. Experimental Brain Research 192(1),87–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allweiss, T. C. (2015). The digitalised handedness profile: reliability and measurement error of the digital and the conventional methods of analysis. [Masterthesis]. Hamburg: Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg.Google Scholar
  3. Alphonso, K., Roy, E. A., Bryden, P. J., Balkowski, B., Mayer, M., & Kuehner, Z. (2008). Preference and performance measures of handedness. The effect of task complexity. Brain and Cognition 67, 11.Google Scholar
  4. Annett, M. (1970). The growth of manual preference and speed. British Journal of Psychology 61(4),545–558.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Annett, M. (1985). Left, right, hand and brain: the Right-Shift Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Annett, M. (1998). The stability of handedness. In: K. J. Conolly (Ed.), The psychobiology of the hand (Vol. 147, pp. 63–76). London: Mac Keith Press.Google Scholar
  7. Annett, M. (2002). Handedness and brain asymmetry: The right shift theory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ayres, J. (1989). Sensory Integration and Praxis Test: Western Psychological Services. https://www.wpspublish.com/store/images/downloads/product/sipt_sample-test-report.pdf. Zugegriffen: 09. Juni 2018.
  9. Barnsley, R. H., & Rabinovitch, M. S. (1970). Handedness. Proficiency versus stated preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills 30(2), S. 343–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bear, D., Schiff, D., Saver, J., Greenberg, M., & Freeman, R. (1986). Quantitative analysis of cerebral asymmetries, fronto-occiptial correlation, sexual dismorphism and association with handedness. Archives of Neurology 43, 598–603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bishop, D. V. M. (1989). Does hand proficiency determine hand preference? British Journal of Psychology 80, 191–199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bishop, D. V. M., Ross, V. A., Daniels, M. S., & Bright, P. (1996). The measurement of hand preference: a validation study comparing three groups. British Journal of Psychology 87, 269–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, S. G., Roy, E. A., Rohr, L. E., Snider, B. R., & Bryden, P. J. (2004). Preference and performance measures of handedness. Brain and Cognition 55(2),283–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, S. G., Roy, E., Rohr, L., & Bryden, P. J. (2006). Using hand performance measures to predict handedness. Laterality 11(1),1–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruckner, J. (2010). Erfassung der Handpräferenz bei Kindern von 4 bis 6 Jahren und entwicklungspsychologische Relevanz der differenzierten Erfassung der Handpräferenz im Kindergartenalter. [Dissertation]. Wien: Universität Wien. Fakultät für Psychologie.Google Scholar
  16. Bruckner, J., Kastner-Koller, U., Deimann, P., & Voracek, M. (2011). Drawing and handedness of preschoolers: a repeated-measurement approach to hand preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills 112(1),258–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bryden, M. P. (1977). Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia 15, 617–628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bryden, P. J., & Roy, E. A. (2005). Unimanual performance across the age span. Brain and Cognition 57(1),26–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bryden, P. J., & E. A. Roy (2006). Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children. Developmental Psychobiology 48, 121–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bryden, P. J., Pryde, K. M., & Roy, E. A. (2000). A performance measure of the degree of hand preference. Brain and Cognition 44(3),402–414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bryden, P. J., Roy, E. A., Rohr, L. E., & Egilo, S. (2007). Task demands affect manual asymmetries in pegboard performance. Laterality 12, 364–377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Carlier, M., Duyme, M., Capron, C., Dumont, A. M., & Perez-Diaz, F. (1993). Is a dot-filling group test a good tool for assessing manual performing in children? Neuropsychologia 31(3),233–240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Carlier, M., Doyen, A.-L., & Lamard, C. (2006). Midline crossing. Developmental trend from 3 to 10 years of age in a preferential card-reaching task. Brain and Cognition 61(3),255–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Carson, R. G., Thomas J., Summers, J. J., Walters, M. R., & Semjen, A. (1997). T he dynamics of bimanual circle drawing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A(3), 664–683.Google Scholar
  25. Cattaert, D., Semjen, A., & Summers, J. J. (1999). Simulating a neural cross-talk model for between-hand interference during bimanual circle drawing. Biological Cybernetics 81, 343–358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Christman, S. D. (2012). Handedness. In: V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 290–296). Oxford: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Christman, S. D. (2014). Individual differences in personality as a function of degree of handedness: consistent-handers are less sensation seeking, more authoritarian, and more sensitive to disgust. Laterality 19(3),354–367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cochet, H., & Byrne, R. W. (2013). Evolutionary origins of human handedness. Evaluating contrasting hypotheses. Animal Cognition 16(4),531–542.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Colman, H. A., Remington, R. W., & Kritikos, A. (2017). Handedness and graspability modify shifts of visuospatial attention to near-hand objects. Public Library of Science one PLoS 1 12(1), e0170542.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Corey, D. M., Hurley, M. M., & Foundas, A. L. (2001). Right and left handedness defined. A multivariate approach using hand preference and hand performance measures. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology 14(3),144–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Dellatolas, G., Amnesia, I., Jallon, P., Chavance, M., & Lellouch, J. (1990). An Epidemiological reconsideration of the Geschwind-Galaburda theory of cerebral lateralization. Archives of Neurology 47, 778–782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Denny, K., & Zhang, W. (2010). In praise of ambidexterity. How a continuum of handedness predicts social adjustment: University College Dublin. School of Economics. http://researchrepository.ucd.ie/handle/10197/2634. Zugegriffen: 09. Juni 2018.
  33. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Arbeitsmedizin und Umweltmedizin (DGAUM). (2014). Leitlinie: Händigkeit – Bedeutung und Untersuchung. Registernummer 002-017. Klassifikation S1. Stand: 21.11.2014, gültig bis 20.11.2019. http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/002-017.html. Zugegriffen: 09. Juni 2018.
  34. Fagard, J. (1987). Bimanual stereotypes: bimanual coordination in children as a function of movements and relative velocity. Journal of Motor Behavior 19(3),355–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fagard, J., & Lockman, J. J. (2005): The effect of task constraints on infants’ (bi)manual strategy for grasping and exploring objects. Infant Behavior and Development 28(3),305–315.Google Scholar
  36. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47(6),381–391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fleishman, E. A. (1972). Structure and measurement of psychomotor abilities. In: R. N. Singer (Ed.), The psychomotor domain (pp. 78–196). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  38. Gilbert, A. N., & Wysocki, C. J. (1992). Hand preference and age in the United States. Neuropschologia 30(7),601–608.Google Scholar
  39. Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A., & Voress, J. K. (1993). Developmental test of visual perception (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  40. Hardie, S. M., Wright, L., & Clark, L. (2016). Handedness and social anxiety: Using Bryden's research as a catalyst to explore the influence of familial sinistrality and degree of handedness. Laterality 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2015.1131712.
  41. Hardyck, C., & Petrinovich, L. F. (1977). Left-handedness. Psychological Bulletin 84(3),385–404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Healey, J. M., Liederman, J., & Geschwind, N. (1986). Handedness is not a unidimensional trait. Cortex 22(1),33–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hill, E. L., & Bishop, D. V. (1998). A reaching test reveals weak hand preference in specific language impairment and developmental co-ordination disorder. Laterality 3(4),295–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hill, E. L., & Khanem, F. (2009). The development of hand preference in children: the effect of task demands and links with manual dexterity. Brain and Cognition 71(2),99–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ida, M., Mandal, M. K., & Bryden, P. J. (2000). Factor structures of hand preference questionnaires: Are “skilled” and “unskilled” factors artifacts? In: M. K. Mandal, M. B. Bulman-Fleming, & G. Tiwari (Eds.), Side bias: a neuropsychological perspective (pp. 175–190). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Karapetsas, A. B., & Vlachos, F. M. (1997). Sex and handedness in development of visuomotor skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills 85(1),137–140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kraus, E. (2003). The development of a normative profile to determine the extent of handedness in children. [PhD thesis]. Melbourne: La Trobe University, Melbourne. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-ash/frontdoor/index/index/start/0/rows/10/sortfield/score/sortorder/desc/searchtype/simple/query/kraus+handedness/docId/230. Zugegriffen: 09. Juni 2018.
  48. Kraus, E. (2006). Ist das Überkreuzen der Körpermittellinie ein Indikator für die Handpräferenz bei Kindern? Ergoscience 1(3),100–109.Google Scholar
  49. Kraus, E. (2008). Händigkeit bei Kindern: Definition und Diagnostik – Das mach ich doch mit links! Ergopraxis 1(7/8), 24–27.Google Scholar
  50. Kraus, E. (2018). Manual zum Händigkeitsprofil. Manual for Assessment. [Nicht publiziert. Das Manual ist nur über eine Kursteilnahme erhältlich.]. Berlin.Google Scholar
  51. Largo, R. H., Fischer, J. E., Caflisch, J. A., & Jenni, O. G. (2007). Züricher Neuromotorik Test (2. Aufl.). Zürich: AWE-Verlag.Google Scholar
  52. Mamolo, C. M., Roy, E. A., Bryden, P. J., & Rohr, L. E. (2004). The effects of skill demands and object position on the distribution of preferred hand reaches. Brain and Cognition 55(2),349–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. McFarland, K, & Anderson, J. (1980). Factor stability of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory as a function of test-retest performance, age and sex. British Journal of Psychology 71, 135–142.Google Scholar
  54. McManus, C. (2004). Right hand, left hand: The origins of asymmetry in brains, bodies, atoms and cultures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Michell, D., & Wood, N. (1999). An investigation of midline crossing in three-year-old children. Physiotherapy 85(11),607–615.Google Scholar
  56. Niebauer, C. L., Christman, S., Reid, S., & Garvey, K. (2004). Interhemispheric interaction and beliefs on our origin: degree of handedness predicts beliefs in creationism versus evolution. Laterality 9(4),433–447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97–113.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Olsson, B. R. A. (1989). Linkshändigkeit (Bd. 34). Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  59. Peters, M. (1998). Description and validation of a flexible and broadly usable handedness questionnaire. Laterality 3(1),77–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Peters, M., & Durding, B. M. (1978). Handedness measured by finger tapping: a continuous variable. Canadian Journal of Psychology 32(4),257–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Prichard, E., Propper, R. E., & Christman, S. D. (2013). Degree of handedness, but not direction, is a systematic predictor of cognitive performance. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Provine, R. R., & Westerman, J.A. (1979). Crossing the midline: Limits of early eye-hand behavior. Child Development 50(2),437–441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Przybyla, A., Coelho, C. J., Akpinar, S., Kirazci, S., Sainburg, R. L. (2013). Sensorimotor performance asymmetries predict hand selection. Neuroscience 228, 349–360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sattler, J. B. (2002). Linkshändige und umgeschulte linkshändige Kinder sowie Kinder mit wechselndem Handgebrauch in der Ergotherapie. Ergotherapie und Rehabilitation 41, 21–29.Google Scholar
  65. Sattler, J. B. (2008). Sattler Methode zur Händigkeitsabklärung (S-MH). http://www.lefthander-consulting.org/deutsch/Beobachtungsbogen.pdf. Zugegriffen: 09. Juni 2018.
  66. Schachter, S. C., Ransil, B. J., & Geschwind, N. (1987). Associations of handedness with hair color and learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia 25(1),269–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Scharoun, S. M., & Bryden, P. J. (2012). Test-retest reliability of the Wathand Cabinet Test in children and adults. Journal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository) 44(1).Google Scholar
  68. Scharoun, S. M., Bryden, P. J. (2014). Hand preference, performance abilities, and hand selection in children. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 82.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Schilling, F. (1974). [Psychological examinations of the diagnostic valency of manual dexterity in childhood (author's transl)]. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde 122(9),763–766.Google Scholar
  70. Schilling, F. (2009). PTK – LDT. Punktiertest und Leistungs-Dominanztest für Kinder (5–12 Jahre). Dortmund: Verlag Modernes Lernen.Google Scholar
  71. Schönthaler, E. (2013). Grafomotorik und Händigkeit: Ergotherapie bei Kindern. Stuttgart: Thieme.Google Scholar
  72. Soper, H. V., Satz, P., Orsini, D. L., Henry, R. R., Zvi, J. C., & Schulman, M. (1986). Handedness patterns in autism suggest subtypes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 16(2),155–167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Steding-Albrecht, U., & Becker, H. (2006). Ergotherapie im Arbeitsfeld Pädiatrie. Stuttgart: Thieme.Google Scholar
  74. Steenhuis, R. E., & Bryden, M. P. (1989). Different dimensions of hand preference that relate to skilled and unskilled activities 1. Cortex 25(2),289–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Steenhuis, R. E., Bryden, M. P., Schwartz, M., & Lawson, S. (1990). Reliability of hand preference items and factors. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,12, 921–930.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Steingrüber, H. J., & Linert, G. A. (2010). HDT – Hand-Dominanz-Test (3. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  77. Surburg, P. R., & Eason, B. (1999). Midline-crossing inhibition. An indicator of developmental delay. Laterality 4(4),333–343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Tan, L. E. (1985). Laterality and motor skills in four-year-olds. Child Development 56, 119–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Tapley, S. M., & Bryden, M. P. (1985). A group test for the assessment of performance between the hands. Neuropsychologia 23, 215–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Tiffin, J., & Asher, E. I. (1948). The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 32, 234–247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang, Y. C., Magasi, S. R., Bohannon, R. W., Reuben, D. B., McCreath, H. E., Bubela, D. J., et al. (2011). Assessing dexterity function: a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox. Journal of Hand Therapy 24(4),313–320; quiz 321.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alice Salomon HochschuleBerlinDeutschland
  2. 2.Institut für Soziale Gesundheit, Katholische Hochschule für Sozialwesen BerlinBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations