Advertisement

Methodology

  • Allen M. Khakshooy
  • Francesco Chiappelli
Chapter

Abstract

In the next leg of our “three-legged” stool, we learn that the research methodology is much more than just a simple set of methods—it is the science of measurement and the process of obtaining and allocating the sample. Methodology also critically evaluates the overall validity and reliability of scientific research. We ask questions like how the researchers obtain their information and why they use a particular technique, tool, or protocol.

Keywords

Population Sample Simple random sampling Systematic sample Stratified sampling Cluster sampling Researcher-completed instruments Subject-completed instruments Construct validity Content validity Criterion validity Reliable instrument Inter-rater reliability Intra-rater reliability Generalizability (G) theory Data Quantitative data Qualitative data Variable Continuous variable Discrete variable Interval measures Ratio measures Categorical variable Nominal measure Dichotomous measure Ordinal measure 

Supplementary material

Video 1

Variables. Reprint courtesy of International Business Machines Corporation, © International Business Machines Corporation (MOV 108085 kb)

Recommended Reading

  1. Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 1998.Google Scholar
  2. Kung J, Chiappelli F, Cajulis OO, Avezova R, Kossan G, Chew L, Maida CA. From systematic reviews to clinical recommendations for evidence-based health care: validation of revised assessment of multiple systematic reviews (R-AMSTAR) for grading of clinical relevance. Open Dent J. 2010;4:84–91.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601004020084.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol. 1995;50(9):741–9.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1500–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wagner C, Esbensen KH. Theory of sampling: four critical success factors before analysis. J AOAC Int. 2015;98(2):275–81.  https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.14-236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. West S, King V, Carey TS, et al. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence: summary. In: AHRQ evidence report summaries. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2002. 47:1998–2005. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11930/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allen M. Khakshooy
    • 1
  • Francesco Chiappelli
    • 2
  1. 1.Rappaport Faculty of MedicineTechnion-Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.UCLA School of DentistryLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations