Advertisement

Person, Situation und Person-Situation-Interaktion im Sport

  • Katharina GeukesEmail author
  • Stephanie J. Hanrahan
  • Mitja D. Back
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der Sportpsychologie ist die Beschreibung und Erklärung menschlichen Erlebens (Denken, Fühlen, Wollen) und Verhaltens im Sport. Der Fokus dieses Kapitels liegt auf der Beschreibung (vor allem der Konzeption und Messung) und der Erklärung von intra- und interindividuellen Unterschieden im momentanen Erleben und Verhalten (in Zuständen oder states) durch Person- und Situationseigenschaften. Für deren Erklärung werden drei Effekte herangezogen: 1. Effekte der Person (Zusammenhänge von Persönlichkeitseigenschaften mit states), 2. Effekte der Situation (Zusammenhänge von Situationseigenschaften mit states) und 3. Effekte der Interaktion von Person und Situation (unterschiedlich starke Zusammenhänge von Persönlichkeitseigenschaften mit states, die abhängig von Situationseigenschaften sind). Auf Basis dieses empirischen Wissens werden weitergehende Konzepte vorgestellt und vor dem Hintergrund des Ziels der Sportpsychologie forschungs- und praxisbezogene Implikationen diskutiert.

Literatur

  1. Aidman, E., & Schofield, G. (2004). Personality and individual differences in sport. In T. Morris & J. Summers (Hrsg.), Sport psychology: Theory, applications and issues (S. 22–47). Milton: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, M. S., Greenlees, I., & Jones, M. V. (2011). An investigation of the five-factor model of personality and coping behaviour in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29, 841–850.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Allport, G. W. (1927). Concepts of trait and personality. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  5. Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., & John, O. P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho‐lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 4(2), 89–118.Google Scholar
  6. Asendorpf, J. B. (2003). Head-to-head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions. European Journal of Personality, 17, 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Asendorpf, J. B. (2012). Persönlichkeitspsychologie: Für Bachelor. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15, 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1013–1037.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 610–620.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Baumeister, R. F., & Steinhilber, A. (1984). Paradoxical effects of supportive audiences on performance under pressure: The home field disadvantage in sports championships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baumeister, R. F., & Showers, C. J. (1986). A review of paradoxical performance effects: Choking under pressure in sports and mental tests. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI). Göttingen: Hogrefe. (Handanweisung).Google Scholar
  16. Cameron, J. E., Cameron, J. M., Dithurbide, L., & Lalonde, R. N. (2012). Personality traits and stereotypes associated with ice hockey positions. Journal of Sport Behavior, 35, 109–124.Google Scholar
  17. Castanier, C., Le Scanff, C., & Woodman, T. (2010). Who takes risks in high-risk sports? A typological personality approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81, 478–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Danner, D., Rammstedt, B., Bluemke, M., Treiber, L., Berres, S., Soto, C., & John, O. (2016). Die deutsche Version des Big Five Inventory 2 (BFI-2). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen.Google Scholar
  19. Danner, D., Rammstedt, B., Bluemke, M., Lechner, C., Berres, S., Knopf, T., Soto, C., & John, O. (2019). Das Big Five Inventar 2. Validierung eines Persönlichkeitsinventars zur Erfassung von 5 Persönlichkeitsdomänen und 15 Facetten. Diagnostica.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000218.
  20. Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 77–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). Person × Situation interactions: Choice of situations and congruence response models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 580–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eagleton, J. R., McKelvie, S. J., & De Man, A. (2007). Extraversion and neuroticism in team sport participants, individual sport participants, and non-participants. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 265–275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Egloff, B., & Jan Gruhn, A. (1996). Personality and endurance sports. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Funder, D. C. (2015). The Personality puzzle: Seventh international student edition. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  28. Geukes, K., Mesagno, C., Hanrahan, S. J., & Kellmann, M. (2012). Testing an interactionist perspective on the relationship between personality and performance under public pressure. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geukes, K., Mesagno, C., Hanrahan, S. J., & Kellmann, M. (2013a). Activation of self-focus and self-presentation traits under private, mixed, and public pressure. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 35, 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geukes, K., Mesagno, C., Hanrahan, S. J., & Kellmann, M. (2013b). Performing under pressure in private: Activation of self-focus traits. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geukes, K., Harvey, J. T., Trezise, A., & Mesagno, C. (2017a). Personality and performance in real-world competitions: Testing trait activation of fear of negative evaluation, dispositional reinvestment, and athletic identity in the field. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 30, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Hutteman, R., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. D. (2017b). Trait personality and state variability: Predicting individual differences in within- and cross-context fluctuations in affect, self-evaluations, and behavior in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 124–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Graydon, J., & Murphy, T. (1995). The effects of personality on social facilitation whilst performing a sports related task. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jamieson, J. P. (2010). The home field advantage in athletics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1819–1848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, R. W., & Morgan, W. P. (1981). Personality characteristics of college athletes in different sports. Scandinavian Journal of Sports Science, 3, 41–49.Google Scholar
  36. Kirkaldy, B. D. (1982a). Personality profiles at various levels of athletic participation. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirkaldy, B. D. (1982b). Personality and sex differences related to positions in team sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 13, 141–153.Google Scholar
  38. Lackie, W. L. (1962). Personality characteristics of certain groups of intercollegiate athletes. Research Quarterly, 33, 566–573.Google Scholar
  39. Leckelt, M., Küfner, A. C. P., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2015). Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 856–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leikas, S., Lönnqvist, J. E., & Verkasalo, M. (2012). Persons, situations, and behaviors: Consistency and variability of different behaviors in four interpersonal situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2001). Understanding extraverts' enjoyment of social situations: The importance of pleasantness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 343–356.Google Scholar
  43. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mesagno, C., Geukes, K., & Larkin, P. (2015). Choking under pressure: A review of current debates, literature, and interventions. In S. D. Mellalieu & S. Hanton (Hrsg.), Contemporary advances in sport psychology: A review (S. 148–174). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Mesagno, C., Harvey, J. T., & Janelle, C. M. (2011). Self-presentational origins of choking: Evidence from separate pressure manipulations. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milgram, S. (1975). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper/Colophon.Google Scholar
  48. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morgan, W. P. (1968). Personality characteristics of wrestlers participating in the world championships. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 8, 212–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nia, M. E., & Besharat, M. A. (2010). Comparison of athletes’ personality characteristics in individual and team sports. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 808–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Sullivan, D. M., Zuckerman, M., & Kraft, M. (1998). Personality characteristics of male and female participants in team sports. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Otten, M. (2009). Choking vs. clutch performance: A study of sport performance under pressure. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31, 583–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (2003). NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, Revidierte Fassung (NEO-PI-R). Göttingen: Hogrefe. (Manual).Google Scholar
  55. Pittenger, D. J. (2004). The limitations of extracting typologies from trait measures of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 779–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rauthmann, J. F., & Sherman, R. A. (2016). Measuring the situational eight DIAMONDS characteristics of situations: An optimization of the RSQ-8 to the S8*. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., et al. (2014). The situational eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., Jr., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rhea, D. J., & Martin, S. (2010). Personality trait differences of traditional sport athletes, bullriders, and other alternative sport athletes. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 5, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rhodes, R. E., & Smith, N. E. (2006). Personality correlates of physical activity: A review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40, 958–965.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Rogulj, N., Nazor, M., Srhoj, V., & Božin, D. (2006). Differences between competitively efficient and less efficient junior handball players according to their personality traits. Kinesiology, 38, 158–163.Google Scholar
  62. Schupp, J., & Gerlitz, J.-Y. (2014). Big Five Inventory-SOEP (BFI-S). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen.  https://doi.org/10.6102/zis54.
  63. Strauss, B. (2002). Social facilitation in motor tasks: A review of research and theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ten Berge, M. A., & De Raad, B. (2002). The structure of situations from a personality perspective. European Journal of Personality, 16, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tok, S. (2011). The big five personality traits and risky sport participation. Social Behavior and Personality, 39, 1105–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams, L. R., & Parkin, W. A. (1980). Personality factor profiles of three hockey groups. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 11, 113–120.Google Scholar
  68. Woodman, T., & Hardy, L. (2003). The relative impact of cognitive anxiety and self-confidence upon sport performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 443–457.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Woodman, T., Davis, P. A., Hardy, L., Callow, N., Glasscock, I., & Yuill-Proctor, J. (2009). Emotions and sport performance: An exploration of happiness, hope, and anger. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31, 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wright, E. F., Jackson, W., Christie, S. D., McGuire, G. R., & Wright, R. D. (1991). The home-course disadvantage in golf championships: Further evidence for the undermining effect of supportive audiences on performance under pressure. Journal of Sport Behavior, 14, 51–61.Google Scholar
  71. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social Facilitation. Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharina Geukes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stephanie J. Hanrahan
    • 2
  • Mitja D. Back
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychologisches InstitutWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterMünsterDeutschland
  2. 2.Faculty of Health and Behavioral SciencesThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralien

Personalised recommendations