Empirische Ergebnisse des Hoffnungsbarometers

  • Andreas M. Krafft
  • Andreas M. Walker
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel werden Ergebnisse des Hoffnungsbarometers in Deutschland und der Schweiz vorgestellt. Befragt wurde die Öffentlichkeit über die Bedeutung von Hoffnung, über ihre Zufriedenheit und Zukunftserwartungen, über ihre persönlichen und gesellschaftlichen Hoffnungen, über die Quellen von Hoffnung sowie über das Glück und die Erfüllung im Leben. Die Ergebnisse von mehr als 40.000 Teilnehmenden lassen die Wichtigkeit von Hoffnung erkennen. Bezüglich der spezifischen Hoffnungen der Menschen wird zwischen eudaimonischen (sozialen, sinnorientierten, altruistischen) und hedonisch-materiellen (Geld, Erfolg, Vergnügen) Hoffnungsobjekten differenziert. Die bedeutendsten Quellen von Hoffnung finden sich im familiären und sozialen Umfeld und in einem ausgeprägten Selbstvertrauen. Eine besondere Rolle spielt für manche Menschen der religiöse und spirituelle Glaube. Hoffnung wird als wesentliches Phänomen im Zusammenhang mit einem gesunden, glücklichen und erfüllten Leben aufgefasst.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Averill, J. R., & Sundararajan, L. (2005). Hope as rhetoric: Cultural narratives of wishing and coping. In J. Eliott (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on hope (pp. 133–165). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  2. Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 471–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biggs, D., De Ville, B., & Suen, E. (1991). A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. Journal of Applied Statistics, 18(1), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carstensen, L. L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Brooks, K. P., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dufault, K., & Martocchio, B. C. (1985). Symposium on compassionate care and the dying experience. Hope: its spheres and dimensions. The Nursing Clinics of North America, 20(2), 379–391.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Durand, M. (2015). The OECD Better Life Initiative: How’s Life? and the measurement of well‐being. Review of Income and Wealth, 61(1), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eliott, J. A. (2005). What have we done with hope? A brief history. In J. Eliott (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on hope (pp. 3–45). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  11. Erickson, R. C., Post, R. D., & Paige, A. B. (1975). Hope as a psychiatric variable. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31(2), 324–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farran, C. J., Herth, K. A., & Popovich, J. M. (1995). Hope and hopelessness: Critical clinical constructs. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Ferring, D., Balducci, C., Burholt, V., Wenger, C., Thissen, F., Weber, G., & Hallberg, I. (2004). Life satisfaction of older people in six European countries: Findings from the European study on adult well-being. European Journal of Ageing, 1(1), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering algorithms. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Herth, K. (2005). State of the science of hope in nursing practice: Hope, the nurse, and the patient. In J. Eliott (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on hope (pp. 169–213). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  16. Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 837–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hwang, J. Y., Plante, T., & Lackey, K. (2008). The development of the Santa Clara brief compassion scale: An abbreviation of Sprecher and Fehr’s compassionate love scale. Pastoral Psychology, 56(4), 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Joseph, S., Linley, P. A., Shevlin, M., Goodfellow, B., & Butler, L. D. (2006). Assessing positive and negative changes in the aftermath of adversity: A short form of the changes in outlook questionnaire. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 11(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kjell, O., Daukantaité, D., Hefferon, K., & Sikström, S. (2016). Harmony in Life Scale complements the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Social Indicators Research, 126, 893–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krafft, A. M., Martin-Krumm, C., & Fenouillet, F. (2017). Adaptation, further elaboration, and validation of a scale to measure hope as perceived by people. Assessment, Apr 1,  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117700724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2009). An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ-4. Psychosomatics, 50(6), 613–621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2011). Meaning in life and posttraumatic growth. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 16(2), 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nickell, G. S. (1998). The Helping Attitude Scale: A new measure of prosocial tendencies. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  27. Parsian, N., & Dunning, T. A. (2009). Developing and validating a questionnaire to measure spirituality: A psychometric process. Global Journal of Health Science, 1(1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Plante, T. G., & Boccaccini, M. T. (1997). The Santa Clara strength of religious faith questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 45(5), 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2013). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. In A. Delle Fave (Ed.), The exploration of happiness: Present and future perspectives (pp. 117–139). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schnell, T., & Becker, P. (2007). Fragebogen zu Lebensbedeutungen und Lebenssinn: LeBe. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  33. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (Eds.). (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  34. Scioli, A., Ricci, M., Nyugen, T., & Scioli, E. R. (2011). Hope: Its nature and measurement. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3(2), 78–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seligman, M. E. (2004). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  36. Slezackova, A., & Krafft, A. (2016). Hope – A driving force of optimal human development. In J. Mohan, M. Sehgal (Eds.), Idea of Excellence: Multiple Perspectives. Panjab University Chandigarh: Publication Bureau.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Staats, S. (1989). Hope: A comparison of two self-report measures for adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(2), 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Storch, E. A., Roberti, J. W., Bravata, E., & Storch, J. B. (2004). Psychometric investigation of the Santa Clara strength of religious faith questionnaire - Short-form. Pastoral Psychology, 52(6), 479–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tennen, H., Affleck, G., & Tennen, R. (2002). Clipped feathers: The theory and measurement of hope. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 311–317.Google Scholar
  43. Vallerand, R. J. (2016). Persistence Scale. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
  44. Wehner, T., Mieg, H., & Güntert, S. (2006). Frei-gemeinnützige Arbeit. In S. Mühlpfordt, P. Richter (Hrsg.), Ehrenamt und Erwerbsarbeit. Hampp: München.Google Scholar
  45. WHOQOL-SRPB Group (2002). WHOQOL-SRPB Users Manual: Scoring and coding for the WHOQOL SRPB field test instrument. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  46. Yates, T. M., & Masten, A. S. (2004). Fostering the future: Resilience theory and the practice of positive psychology. In P. A. Linley, S. Joseph (Hrsg.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 521–539). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas M. Krafft
    • 1
  • Andreas M. Walker
    • 2
  1. 1.swissfutureWittenbachSchweiz
  2. 2.swissfutureBaselSchweiz

Personalised recommendations