Advertisement

Comparison to Open Techniques

  • Baukje Van Den Heuvel
  • Robert J. FitzgibbonsJr.
  • Reinhard Bittner
Chapter

Abstract

Within the last century many new techniques to repair an inguinal hernia have been developed. A prosthetic-based repair has gained more and more support because of lower recurrence rate when compared to a pure tissue repair and is regarded as the gold standard. The basic principle of the prosthetic repair is to reinforce the posterior wall of the inguinal canal. Currently polypropylene in mesh form is the most popular material for doing this. The material can be placed anteriorly with an open conventional approach such as the Lichtenstein operation or posteriorly as with the laparoscopic repairs. Pure tissue repairs such as the Shouldice operation remain popular especially in certain specialty centers. In this chapter, the outcomes of the open techniques will be critically compared to laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy.

References

  1. 1.
    Aasvang EK, Gmaehle E, Hansen JB, Gmaehle B, Forman JL, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Kehlet H. Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(4):957–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amid PK. Groin hernia repair: open techniques. World J Surg. 2005;29(8):1046–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bekker J, Keeman JN, Simons MP, et al. A brief history of the inguinal hernia operation in adults. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007;151(16):924–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bendavid R. Biography: Edward Earle Shouldice (1890-1965). Hernia. 2003;7(4):172–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal Hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2773–843.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bochkarev V, Ringley C, Vitamvas M, et al. Bilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in patients with occult contralateral inguinal defects. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(5):734–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crawford DL, Hiatt JR, Phillips EH. Laparoscopy identifies unexpected groin hernias. Am Surg. 1998;64(10):976–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dahlstrand U, Sandblom G, Ljungdahl M, et al. TEP under general anesthesia is superior to Lichtenstein under local anesthesia in terms of pain 6 weeks after surgery: results from a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(10):3632–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dhankhar DS, Sharma N, Mishra T, et al. Totally extraperitoneal repair under general anesthesia versus Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia for unilateral inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(3):996–1002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eker HH, Langeveld HR, Klitsie PJ, et al. Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study. Arch Surg. 2012;147(3):256–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eklund AS, Rudberg C, Smedberg S. Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2006;93(9):1060–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, et al. Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2009;249(1):33–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eklund AS, Carlsson P, Rosenblad A, et al. Long-term cost-minimization analysis comparing laparoscopic with open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2010;97(5):765–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    El-Dhuwaib Y1, Corless D, Emmett C, et al. Laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: a longitudinal cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):936–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fitzgibbons RJ, Camps J, Cornet DA, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 1995;221(1):3–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ger R. The management of certain abdominal herniae by intra-abdominal closure of the neck of the sac. Preliminary communication. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1982;64(5):342–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gokalp A, Inal M, Maralcan G, et al. A prospective randomized study of Lichtenstein open tension-free versus laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Acta Chir Belg. 2003;103(5):502–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, et al. Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(1):234–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Griffin KJ, Harris S, Tang TY, et al. Incidence of contralateral occult inguinal hernia found at the time of laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) repair. Hernia. 2010;14(4):345–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hamza Y, Gabr E, Hammadi H, et al. Four-arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs. Int J Surg. 2010;8(1):25–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit. A randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc. 1998a;12(10):1199–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koivukangas P, et al. A prospective randomized outcome and cost comparison of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty versus Lichtenstein hernia operation among employed patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998b;8(5):338–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kehlet H, Aasvang E. Groin hernia repair: anesthesia. World J Surg. 2005;29(8):1058–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kingsley D, Vogt DM, Nelson MT. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg. 1998;176(6):548–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koehler RH. Diagnosing the occult contralateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(3):512–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koning GG, Wetterslev J, van Laarhoven CJ. The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein’s technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trials. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):52599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lal P, Philips P, Saxena KN, et al. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair under epidural anesthesia: a detailed evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(4):595–601.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK. Day-case endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(1):76–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lichtenstein IL, Shore JM. Exploding the myths of hernia repair. Am J Surg. 1976;132(3):307–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG. Ambulatory outpatient hernia surgery. Including a new concept, introducing tension-free repair. Int Surg. 1986;71(1):1–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McCormack K, Wake BL, Fraser C, et al. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review. Hernia. 2005;9(2):109–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Jorgensen LN, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Simons MP. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2014;18(2):151–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1236-6. Epub 2014 Mar 20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    O’Reilly EA, Burke JP, O’Connell PR. A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Ann Surg. 2012;255(5):846–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Panton ON, Panton RJ. Laparoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg. 1994;167(5):535–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Poelman MM, van den Heuvel B, Deelder JD, et al. EAES consensus development conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(10):3505–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Read RC. The contributions of Usher and others to the elimination of tension from groin herniorrhaphy. Hernia. 2005;9(3):208–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Read RC. Herniology: past, present, and future. Hernia. 2009;13(6):577–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sayad P, Abdo Z, Cacchione R, et al. Incidence of incipient contralateral hernia during laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(6):543–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Simons MP (1996) Dissertation Shouldice in Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13(4):343–403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sinha R, Gurwara AK, Gupta SC. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia: a study of 480 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18(5):673–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stoppa R, Petit J, Henry X. Unsutured Dacron prosthesis in groin hernias. Int Surg. 1975;60(8):411–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stoppa RE, Warlaumont CR, Verhaeghe PJ, et al. Prosthetic repair in the treatment of groin hernias. Int Surg. 1986;71(3):154–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thomas AD, Rogers A. Edoardo Bassini and the wound that inspires. World J Surg. 2004;28(10):1060–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thumbe VK, Evans DS. To repair or not to repair incidental defects found on laparoscopic repair of groin hernia: early results of a randomized control trial. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(1):47–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Toy FK, Smoot RT. Toy-smooth laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1(3):151–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Treadwell J, Tipton K, Oyesanmi O, Sun F, Schoelles K. Surgical options for inguinal hernia: Comparative effectiveness review. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 70. (Prepared by the ECRI Institute Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10063.) AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC091-EF. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD; 2012. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Usher FC, Ochsner J, Tuttle LL Jr. Use of marlex mesh in the repair of incisional hernias. Am Surg. 1958;24(12):969–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baukje Van Den Heuvel
    • 1
  • Robert J. FitzgibbonsJr.
    • 2
  • Reinhard Bittner
    • 3
  1. 1.SurgeryVUMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryCreighton University School of MedicineOmahaUSA
  3. 3.Winghofer Medicum, Hernienzentrum Rottenburg a.N.Rottenburg am NeckarGermany

Personalised recommendations