The Role of the Vertical Scar Technique in Oncoplastic Surgery

  • Moustapha HamdiEmail author
  • Cristina Garusi
  • Marie-Christine Aumais


The loss of a breast or part of it can be a major impairment to a woman’s body image and feeling of attractiveness. Therefore, reconstructive surgery has developed techniques that provide good aesthetic results. The plastic surgeon, who is involved in breast reconstruction after breast cancer, should have a comprehensive understanding of the biology, natural history, risk factors, and treatment of breast cancer. Psychological factors associated with cancer compound those that come into play following any body deformity, and these must be taken into account by the surgeon. Therefore, breast-conservative surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy has become the preferred locoregional treatment for patients with early-stage breast cancer. With the need to preserve the breast shape and the aesthetic outcome, oncoplastic surgery (OPS) has emerged as a new surgical approach [1–4]. The success of OPS relies on the safe oncological resection of the tumor with wide margins and immediate breast reshaping with consideration of the tumor location and resection area as well as the initial breast size and shape [5, 6]. Oncoplastic procedures require a working knowledge of the full range of aesthetic surgical procedures of the breast as well as the spectrum of breast reconstruction techniques. The ultimate goal of the reconstructive procedure is to achieve good aesthetic, long-lasting results with adequate symmetry.


  1. 1.
    Hammond DC, Capraro PA, Ozolins EB, Arnold JF. Use of a skin-sparing reduction pattern to create a combination skin-muscle flap pocket in immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Heerdt AH, Petrek JA, Borgen PJ, Hidalgo DA. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous tissue reconstruction after whole-breast irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simmons RM, Fish SK, Gayle L, La Trenta GS, Swistel A, Christos P, Osborne MP. Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rowland JH. Psychological impact of treatments for breast cancer. In: Spear SL, editor. Surgery of the breast. Philadelphia: Lippicott-Raven; 1998. p. 295.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sufi PA, Gittos M, Collier DS. Envelope mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (EMIR). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26:367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hidalgo DA, Borgen PJ, Petrek JA, Heerdt AH, Cody HS, Disa JJ. Immediate reconstruction after complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autologous tissue. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Wolfe AJ, Tsangaris TN, Pennanen MF. Experience with reduction mammaplasty combined with breast conservation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, Aguilar M, Marubini E. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salvin SA, Love SM, Padousky NL. Reconstruction of the radiated partial mastectomy defect with autogenous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J III, Jones GE, Culbertson JH, Schoemann M. Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malata CM, Hodgson EL, Chikwe J, Canal AC, Purushotham AD. An application of the LeJour vertical mammaplasty pattern for skin-sparing mastectomy: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51:345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petit JY, Garusi C, Greuse M, Rietiens M, Youssef O, Luini A, De Lorenzi F. One hundred and eleven cases of breast conservation treatment with simultaneous reconstruction at the European Institute of Oncology (Milan). Tumori. 2002;88:41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grisotti A. Immediate reconstruction after partial mastectomy. Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;1:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Mosseri V. Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41:471.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clough KB, Kroll SS, Audretsch W. An approach to the repair of partial mastectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moustapha Hamdi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cristina Garusi
    • 2
  • Marie-Christine Aumais
    • 3
  1. 1.Professor and Chairman, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryBrussels University Hospital – Vrij Universiteit Brussel (VUB)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Plastic Surgery DivisionEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
  3. 3.Clinical fellow, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryBrussels University Hospital – Vrij Universiteit Brussel (VUB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations