The Relation Between Music Technology and Music Industry

Chapter
Part of the Springer Handbooks book series (SPRINGERHAND)

Abstract

The music industry has changed drastically over the last century and most of its changes and transformations have been technology-driven. Music technology – encompassing musical instruments, sound generators, studio equipment and software, perceptual audio coding algorithms, and reproduction software and devices – has shaped the way music is produced, performed, distributed, and consumed. The evolution of music technology enabled studios and hobbyist producers to produce music at a technical quality unthinkable decades ago and have affordable access to new effects as well as production techniques. Artists explore nontraditional ways of sound generation and sound modification to create previously unheard effects, soundscapes, or even to conceive new musical styles. The consumer has immediate access to a vast diversity of songs and styles and is able to listen to individualized playlists virtually everywhere and at any time. The most disruptive technological innovations during the past 130 years have probably been:
  1. 1.

    The possibility to record and distribute recordings on a large scale through the gramophone.

     
  2. 2.

    The introduction of vinyl disks enabling high-quality sound reproduction.

     
  1. 3.

    The compact cassette enabling individualized playlists, music sharing with friends and mobile listening.

     
  2. 4.

    Digital audio technology enabling high quality professional-grade studio equipment at low prices.

     
  3. 5.

    Perceptual audio coding in combination with online distribution, streaming, and file sharing.

     

This text will describe these technological innovations and their impact on artists, engineers, and listeners.

CD

compact disc

DAW

digital audio workstation

DRM

digital rights management

NIME

new interfaces for musical expression

SACD

super audio CD

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 44.1
    T.A Edison: Improvement in phonograph and speaking machines, US Patent 200521 (1878)Google Scholar
  2. 44.2
    C.A. Bell, S. Tainter: Recording and reproducing speech and other sounds, US Patent 341214 (1886)Google Scholar
  3. 44.3
    E. Berliner: Gramophone, US Patent 372786 (1887)Google Scholar
  4. 44.4
    W. Furtwängler: Vermächtnis: Nachgelassene Schriften (Brockhaus, Wiesbaden 1975)Google Scholar
  5. 44.5
    R. Kostelanetz, J. Darby, M. Santa (Eds.): Classic Essays on Twentieth-Century Music: A Continuing Symposium (Schirmer Books, New York 1996)Google Scholar
  6. 44.6
    G. Gould: The prospects of recording, High Fidel. Mag. 16(4), 46–63 (1966)Google Scholar
  7. 44.7
    M. Katz: Capturing Sound: How Technology Has Changed Music (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley 2004)Google Scholar
  8. 44.8
    E.C. Wente: Telephone-transmitter, US Patent 1333744 (1920)Google Scholar
  9. 44.9
    R. Philip: Performing Music in the Age of Recording (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven 2004)Google Scholar
  10. 44.10
    S. Weinzierl, C. Franke: ‘Lotte, ein Schwindel!’ – Geschichte und Praxis des Musikschnitts am Beispiel von Beethovens 9. Symphonie. In: Proc. VDT Int. Audio Convention (22. Tonmeistertagung), Hannover (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 44.11
    C. Symes: Setting the Record Straight: A Material History of Classical Recording (Wesleyan Univ. Press, Middletown 2004)Google Scholar
  12. 44.12
    A. Lindau, S. Weinzierl: Assessing the plausibility of virtual acoustic environments. In: Proc. Forum Acusticum, Aalborg (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 44.13
    H.-J. Maempel: Musikaufnahmen als Datenquellen der Interpretationsanalyse. In: Gemessene Interpretation – Computergestützte Aufführungsanalyse im Kreuzverhör der Disziplinen, Klang und Begriff, ed. by H. von Lösch, S. Weinzierl (Schott, Mainz 2011) pp. 157–171Google Scholar
  14. 44.14
    S. Jones: Music and the Internet, Pop. Music 19(2), 217–230 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 44.15
    A. Ross: The Record Effect (The New Yorker, New York 2005)Google Scholar
  16. 44.16
    A. Leyshon: The Software Slump?: Digital music, the democratisation of technology, and the decline of the recording studio sector within the musical economy, Env. Plan. A 41(6), 1309–1331 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 44.17
    J. McCartney: SuperCollider: A new real-time sound synthesis language. In: Proc. Int. Comput. Music Conf. (ICMC), San Francisco (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 44.18
    M.S. Puckette: The Patcher. In: Proc. Int. Comput. Music Conf. (ICMC), San Francisco (1988)Google Scholar
  19. 44.19
    M.S. Puckette: Pure Data: Another integrated computer music environment. In: Proc. Second Intercollege Computer Music Concerts, Tachikawa (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 44.20
    International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, http://www.nime.org/
  21. 44.21
    Georgia Tech Center for Music Technology: http://guthman.gatech.edu
  22. 44.22
    S. Jordà, G. Geiger, M. Alonso, M. Kaltenbrunner: The reacTable: Exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. In: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Tangl. Embed. Interact. (TEI), Munich (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 44.23
    A. Clarkson: Lecture on Dada by Stefan Wolpe, The Music. Q. 72(2), 202–215 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 44.24
    MIDI Manufacturers Association: Complete MIDI 1.0 Detailed Specification V96.1, 2nd edn. (MMA, La Habra 2001)Google Scholar
  25. 44.25
    T. Rodgers: On the process and aesthetics of sampling in electronic music production, Organised Sound 8(03), 313–320 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 44.26
    G. Zuckerman: American Mavericks: An Interview with Steve Reich, http://musicmavericks.publicradio.org (2002)
  27. 44.27
    I. Stravinsky: An Autobiography, ebook edn. (Project Gutenberg 2011), transcribed from M.J. Steuer, New York 1958Google Scholar
  28. 44.28
    A.D. Blumlein: Improvements in and relating to sound-transmission, sound-recording and sound-reproducing systems, US Patent GB394325 (1933)Google Scholar
  29. 44.29
    J. Nathan: Sony (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston 2001)Google Scholar
  30. 44.30
    C.K.M. Lam, B.C.Y. Tan: The Internet is changing the music industry, Commun. ACM 44(8), 62–68 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 44.31
    ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29 11172-3: Information technology – Coding of moving pictures and associated audio for digital storage media up to about 1.5 Mbit/s – Part 3: Audio (ISO/IEC, Geneva 1993)Google Scholar
  32. 44.32
    A. Leyshon: On the reproduction of the musical economy after the internet, Media, Cult. Soc. 27(2), 177–209 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 44.33
    W. Coats, V. Feeman, J. Given, H. Rafter: Streaming into the future: Music and video online, L.A. Entertain. Law Rev. 20(2), 285–308 (2000)Google Scholar
  34. 44.34
    M. Fox: Technological and social drivers of change in the online music industry, First Monday, special edn. 1 (2005), originally published in February 2002Google Scholar
  35. 44.35
    Recording Industry Association of America: www.riaa.com
  36. 44.36
    International Federation of the Phonographic Industry: IFPI Digital Music Report 2013 (IFPI, Zurich 2013)Google Scholar
  37. 44.37
    B.J. Hracs: A creative industry in transition: The rise of digitally driven independent music production, Growth Change 43(3), 442–461 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Music TechnologyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations