Advertisement

Qualitative Forschung

  • Susanne Perkhofer
  • Verena Gebhart
  • Gerhard Tucek
  • Frederick J. Wertz
  • Roman Weigl
  • Valentin Ritschl
  • Helmut Ritschl
  • Barbara Höhsl
  • Barbara Prinz-Buchberger
  • Tanja Stamm
  • Julie S. Mewes
  • Martin Maasz
  • Christine Chapparo
  • Verena C. Tatzer
  • Petra Plunger
  • Elisabeth Reitinger
  • Katharina Heimerl
Chapter
Part of the Studium Pflege, Therapie, Gesundheit book series (SPTG)

Zusammenfassung

Möchte die Forscherin oder der Forscher Meinungen, Erfahrungen, Einstellungen, Werte oder Ähnliches erforschen, so muss ein qualitativer Forschungsansatz gewählt werden. In diesem Kapitel werden qualitative Methoden und Datenerhebungsinstrumente vorgestellt und diskutiert, die häufig in den Gesundheitswissenschaften angewandt werden. Zusätzlich werden unterschiedliche Methoden zur Steigerung der Genauigkeit und Nachvollziehbarkeit der Ergebnisse bei qualitativen Studien beschrieben.

Literatur

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.1

  1. Blumer H (1973) Der methodologische Standort des Symbolischen Interaktionismus. In: Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen (Hrsg) Alltagswissen, Interaktionen und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit. Rohwolt, Reinbek, S 80–146Google Scholar
  2. Corbin J, Strauss A (2004) Weiterleben lernen. Verlauf und Bewältigung chronischer Krankheit, 2. Aufl. Huber, BernGoogle Scholar
  3. Flick U (2011) Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung. Rohwolt, ReinbekGoogle Scholar
  4. Glaser B, Strauss A, Paul A (2010) Grounded Theory. Strategien qualitativer Forschung, 3. Aufl. Huber, BernGoogle Scholar
  5. Lamnek S (2010) Qualitative Sozialforschung, 5. Aufl. Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  6. Mayring P (2002) Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken, 5. Aufl. Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  7. Morse J et al. (1998) Qualitative Pflegeforschung. Anwendung qualitativer Ansätze in der Pflege. Ullstein Medical, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.2

  1. Müller-Mundt G, Schaeffer D (2002) Qualitative Gesundheits- und Pflegeforschung. Huber, BernGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.3

  1. Bogard K, Wertz FJ (2006) The introduction of a qualitative perspective in advanced psychological research training: narrative of a mixed methods. Doctoral Dissertation. The Humanistic Psychologist 34 (4): 369–398Google Scholar
  2. Embree L (2010) Interdisciplinarity within phenomenology. The Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 10: 1–7Google Scholar
  3. Giorgi A (ed) (1985) Phenomenology and psychological research. Duquesne University Press, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  4. Giorgi A (1970) Psychology as a human science: A phenomenologically based approach. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Giorgi A (2009) The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  6. Husserl E (1913) Ideas: general introduction to pure phenomenology. Collier Books, New York (Published 1962)Google Scholar
  7. Husserl E (1954) The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  8. Mezzich J, Snaedal J, van Weel C, Heath I (2010) Toward person-centered medicine: From disease to patient to person. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 77: 304–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Spiegelberg H (1965) The phenomenological movement: a historical introduction (2nd ed). Dordrecht, s.l.: Springer NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  10. Spiegelberg H (1972) Phenomenology in psychology and psychiatry. Northwestern University Press, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  11. Wertz FJ (1983a) From everyday to psychological description: analyzing the moments of a qualitative data analysis. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 14: 197–241Google Scholar
  12. Wertz FJ (1983b) Some components of descriptive psychological reflection. Human Studies 6: 35–51Google Scholar
  13. Wertz FJ (1985) Methods and findings in an empirical analysis of being criminally victimized. In: Giorgi A (ed) Phenomenology and psychological research. Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, pp 155–216Google Scholar
  14. Wertz FJ (1987) Common methodological fundaments of the analytic procedures in phenomenological and psychoanalytic research. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 9 (4): 563–603Google Scholar
  15. Wertz FJ, Charmaz K, McMullen LM, Josselson R, Anderson R, McSpadden E (2011) Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.3.2

  1. Borg Xuereb C, Shaw RL, Lane AD (2015) Patients' and physicians' experiences of atrial fibrillation consultations and anticoagulation decision-making: a multi-perspective IPA design. Psychology & Health, Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1080/08870446.2015.1116534Google Scholar
  2. Cronin-Davis J, Butler A, Mayers CA (2009) Occupational therapy and interpretative phenomenological analysis: comparable research companions? British Journal of Occupational Therapy 72 (8): 332–338. doi:10.1177/030802260907200802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DePoy E, Gitlin LN (2005) Introduction to Research: Understanding and applying multiple strategies, 3rd ed. Elsevier Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  4. Mietz C (2011) Das Erleben von Flow bei einer komplexen psychischen Erkrankung – Eine „Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis“ (IPA)-Fallstudie. Fachhochschule Wien, Campus WienGoogle Scholar
  5. Popejoy E (2015) Parents' experiences of care decisions about children with life-limiting illnesses. Nursing Children and Young People 27 (8): 20–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pringle J, Drummond J, McLafferty E, Hendry C (2011) Interpretative phenomenological analysis: a discussion and critique. Nurse Researcher 18 (3): 20–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schmidt A, Corcoran K, Grahame R, de C Williams AC (2015) How do people with chronically painful joint hypermobility syndrome make decisions about activity? British Journal of Pain 9 (3): 157–166PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith JA (1996) Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological anaylsis in health psychology. Psychology & Health 11: 261–271Google Scholar
  9. Smith JA (1999) Towards a relational self: Social engagement during pregnancy and psychological preparation for motherhood. British Journal of Social Psychology 38 (4): 409–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith JA (2004) Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 1 (1): 39–54Google Scholar
  11. Smith JA, Dunworth F (2003) Qualitative methods in the study of development. In: Connolly K, Valsiner J (eds) Handbook of developmental psychology. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M (2013) Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  13. Taborelli E, Easter A, Keefe R, Schmidt U, Treasure J, Micali N (2015) Transition to motherhood in women with eating disorders: A qualitative study. Psychology and Psychotherapy, Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1111/papt.12076Google Scholar

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.3.3

  1. Babbie ER (2010) The practice of social research. Wadsworth Inc Fulfillment, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  2. Backman C (2010) Occupational balance and well-being. In: Christiansen CH, Townsend EA (eds) Introduction to occupation. The art and science of living, 2nd ed. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, pp 231–249Google Scholar
  3. Breckenridge JP, Jones D, Elliot I, Nicol M (2012) Choosing a methodological path: reflections on the constructivist turn. Grounded Theory Review 11 (1)Google Scholar
  4. Brock K, Harris L, Heard R, Hossian Z, Hough M, O'Loughlin K et al. (eds) (2003) Developing a research project Module Material [Vorlesungsunterlagen]. University of SydneyGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapparo C, Ranka J (1997) Occupational Performance Model (Australia): Monograph 1. Occupational Performance Network, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  6. Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Introducing qualitative methods series. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Charmaz K (2011) Grounded theory methods in socical justice research. In Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4th ed. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 359–380Google Scholar
  8. Charmaz K (2014) Constructing grounded theory, 2. ed. Introducing qualitative methods. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho JY, Eun-Hee L (2014) Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report (19): 1–20Google Scholar
  10. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) (2011) The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4th ed. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  11. DePoy E, Gitlin LN (2011) Introduction to research: Understanding and applying multiple strategies, 4th ed. Elsevier Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  12. Emmel N (2013) Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans GL (2013) A novice researcher's first walk through the maze of grounded theory: rationalization for classical grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review (1) http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2013/06/22/a-novice-researchers-first-walk-through-the-maze-of-grounded-theory-rationalization-for-classical-grounded-theory, letzter Zugriff 21.9.2015
  14. Friese S (2009) Lernmodul 3 – Schreiben und Verwalten von Anmerkungen und Memos. http://www.quarc.de/fileadmin/downloads/ATLASti%20Lernmodul%203_Memos_technische%20Aspekte.pdf, letzter Zugriff 21.9.2015
  15. Friese S (2014) ATLAS.ti 7 user manual.ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser BG (1978) Theoretical sensitivity. Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociololy Press, Mill ValleyGoogle Scholar
  17. Glaser BG (2004) Remodeling grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research (FQS) 2 (5) http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/607/1315, letzter Zugriff 15.11.2015
  18. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1999) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelle U (2005) „Emergence“ vs. „forcing“ of empirical data? A crucial problem of „grounded theory“ reconsidered. Forum: Qualitative Social Research (FQS) 8 (2), www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/467/1000, letzter Zugriff 21.9.2015
  21. Mayring P (2002) Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung, 5. Aufl. Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  22. Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  24. Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ (2013) Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation, 2. Aufl. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  25. Weigl R (2005) The work and leisure definition of male freelancers and self-employed males who work from home. Newsletter on Current Occupational Science Research Projects within Europe, http://www.enothe.hva.nl/cer/docs/ecotros_special_newsletter-aug05.pdf

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.3.4

  1. Breidenstein G, Hirschauer S, Kalthoff H, Nieswand B (2013) Ethnografie. Die Praxis der Feldforschung. UVK, Konstanz/MünchenGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruna S (2009) What is medical anthropology, anyway? Society for Medical Anthropology. www.medanthro.net/9/comment-page-1/
  3. DVE (2007) Definition der Ergotherapie des Deutschen Verbands der Ergotherapeuten e.V. http://www.dve.info/fachthemen/definition-ergotherapie.html
  4. Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (1995) Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Estroff SE (1981) Making it crazy. An ethnography of psychiatric clients in an american community. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  6. Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Goffman E (1973) Asyle – Über die soziale Situation psychisch Kranker und anderer Insassen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/MainGoogle Scholar
  8. Hammersley M, Atkinson P (1995) Ethnography. Principles in practice. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones D, Blair SEE, Hertery T, Jones RK (1998) Sociology & occupational therapy. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  10. Legewie H (1995) Feldforschung und teilnehmende Beobachtung. In: Flick U et.al. (Hrsg) Handbuch qualitative Sozialforschung. Grundlagen, Konzepte, Methoden und Anwendungen. Beltz, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  11. Mattingly C (1998) Healing dramas and clinical plots: the narrative structure of experience. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Mewes J. Alltag, Arbeit, Objekte – Ethnographie der Arbeits- und Alltagspraktiken in der psychiatrischen Ergotherapie. Manuskript in VorbereitungGoogle Scholar
  13. Mol A (2008) The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Mol A, Moser I, Pols J (2010) Care in practice: on tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Transcript, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt-Lauber B (2007) Feldforschung. Kulturanalyse durch teilnehmende Beobachtung. In: Göttsch SL, Albrecht (Hrsg) Methoden der Volkskunde. Positionen, Quellen, Arbeitsweisen der Europäischen Ethnologie. Reimer, Berlin, pp 219–248Google Scholar
  16. Townsend E (1998) Good intentions overruled: a critique of empowerment in the routine organization of mental health services. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.3.5

  1. Beushausen U, Grötzbach H (2011) Evidenzbasierte Sprachtherapie: Grundlagen und Praxis. Elsevier, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  2. Borchard A, Göthlich SE (2009) Definition und Einordnung von Fallstudien als Forschungsansatz. In: Albers S, Klapper D, Konradt U, Walter A, Wolf J (Hrsg) Methodik der empirischen Forschung, 3. Aufl. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  3. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550Google Scholar
  4. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  5. Ophey M (2007) Case Study Research: Was wir von unseren Patienten lernen können. Verbinden von Qualitätszyklus, evidenz-basierter Praxis und Clinical Reasoning in Fallstudien. Manuelle Therapie 11: 1–6Google Scholar
  6. Scherfer E, Bossmann T (2011) Forschung verstehen 2. Aufl. Pflaum, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  7. Stickel-Wolf C, Wolf J (2005) Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten und Lerntechniken, 3. Aufl. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  8. Unicomb R, Colyvas K, Harrison E, Hewat S (2015) Assessment of reliable change using 95% credible intervals for the differences in proportions: a statistical analysis for case-study methodology. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 58: 728–739Google Scholar
  9. Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research, 3rd ed. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  10. Yin RK (2014) Case Study Research. Design and Methods, 5th ed. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.3.6

  1. Berleson B (1952) Content analysis in communication research. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Boepple L, Thompson JK (2014) A content analysis of healthy living blogs: Evidence of content thematically consistent with dysfunctional eating attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Eating Disorders 47 (4): 362–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gläser J, Laudel G (2010) Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  4. Iles RA, Taylor NF, Davidson M, O'Halloran P (2014) An effective coaching intervention for people with low recovery expectations and low back pain: A content analysis. Journal of Back & Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 27 (1): 93–101Google Scholar
  5. Krippendorff KH (2013) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  6. Kvale S, Brinkmann S (2009) Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  7. Mayring P (2010) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  8. Stamm TA, Mattsson M, Mihai C, Stöcker J, Binder A, Bauernfeind B, Boström C (2011) Concepts of functioning and health important to people with systemic sclerosis: a qualitative study in four European countries. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 70 (6): 1074–9PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.3.7

  1. Ajjawi R, Higgs J (2007) Using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning. The Qualitative Report 12 (4): 612–638Google Scholar
  2. Bontekoe R (1996) Dimensions of the hermeneutic circle. Humanities Press, Atlantic HighlandsGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley J (1993) Methodological issues and practices in qualitative research. The Library Quarterly 63 (4): 431–449Google Scholar
  4. Clayton A-M, Thorne T (2000) Diary data enhancing rigour: Analysis framework and verification tool. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32 (6): 1514–1521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Creswell J (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferraris M (1996) History of hermeneutics. Humanities Press, Atlantic HighlandsGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferris E (2013) Mothers' reactions to having a child with disability: the place of chronic sorrow. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Available from C. Chapparo, Discipline of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleming V, Gaidys U, Robb Y (2003) Hermeneutic research in nursing: developing a Gadamerian-based research method. Nursing Inquiry 10: 113–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gadamer HG (1996) Truth and method, 2nd ed. Continuum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Greene M (1995) Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  11. Grondin J (1994) Introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  12. Guba EG, Lincoln YS (2005) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In: Lincoln NLYS (ed) The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp191–215Google Scholar
  13. Habermas J (1990) A review of truth and method. In: Ormiiston G, Schrift A (eds) The hermeneutic tradition: From Ast to Ricouer. State University of New York Press, New York, pp 245–272Google Scholar
  14. Harman G (2007) Heidegger explained: From phenomenon to thing. Open Court, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  15. Heidegger M (1996) Being and time. A translation of Sein and Zeit. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Holloway I, Freshwater D (2007) Vulnerable story telling: narrative research in nursing. Journal of Research in Nursing 12 (6): 703–711Google Scholar
  17. Jones ML (2007) Using software to analyse qualitative data. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research 1 (1): 64–76Google Scholar
  18. Joubish MF, Khurran Ahmed MA, Fatima A, Haider K (2011) Paradigms and characteristics of a good qualitative research. World Applied Sciences Journal 12 (11): 2082–2087Google Scholar
  19. Kinsella EM (2006) Hermeneutics and critical hermeneutics: Exploring possibilities within the art of interpretation. Forum Qualitative Social Research 7: 3Google Scholar
  20. Koch T (1996) Implementation of a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing: Philosophy, rigour and representation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24: 174–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Landridge D (2007) Phenomenological psychology theory, research and method. Pearson, EssexGoogle Scholar
  22. Laverty SM (2003) Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2 (3): 21–35Google Scholar
  23. Lewins A, Silver C (2007) Using software in qualitative research. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  24. Madison GB (1988) The hermeneutics of postmodernity: Figures and themes. Indiana University Press, BloomfieldGoogle Scholar
  25. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book, 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  26. Odman P-J (1988) Hermeneutics. In Keeves JP (ed) Educational research methodology and measurement: An international handbook. Pergamon, New York, pp 63–70Google Scholar
  27. Olshansky S (1962) Chronic sorrow: A response to having a mentally defective child. Social Casework 43: 190–193Google Scholar
  28. Paterson M, Higgs J, (2005) Using hermeneutics as a qualitative research approach in professional practice. The Qualitative Report 10 (2): 339–357Google Scholar
  29. Paterson M, Higgs J, Wilcox S (2006) Developing expertise in judgement artistry in OT practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 69 (3): 115–123Google Scholar
  30. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and qualitative research and evaluation methods evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  31. Ricoeur P (1981) Hermeneutics and human science: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Rorty R (1991) Inquiry as recontexualization: An anti-dualist account of interpretation. In: Hiley D, Bohman J, Shusterman R (eds) The interpretive turn: Philosophy, science and culture. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 59–80Google Scholar
  33. Schilling J (2006) On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment. Designing the process for content analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 22 (1): 28–37Google Scholar
  34. Smith NH (1997) Strong hermeneutics: Contingency and moral identity. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwandt T (2001) Hermeneutic circle. In: Dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 112–118Google Scholar
  36. Tesch R (1990) Qualitative Research: Analysis types and software tools. Falmer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson JL (1990) Hermeneutic inquiry. In: Moody LE (ed) Advancing nursing science through research (vol. 2). Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 223–280Google Scholar
  38. van Manen M (1997) Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy, 2nd ed. Left Coast Press, Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
  39. von Zweck C, Paterson M, Pentland W (2008) The use of hermeneutics in a mixed methods design. The Qualitative Report 13 (1): 116–134Google Scholar
  40. Webster L, Mertova P (2007) Using narrative inquiry as a research method. An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. Routledge, CornwallGoogle Scholar
  41. Weinsheimer JC (1985) Gadamer's hermeneutics: A reading of truth and method. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  42. Welsh E (2002) Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum Qualitative Social Research 3 (2): 1–7Google Scholar
  43. Woodruff Smith D (2007) Husserl. Routledge, CornwallGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.3.8

  1. Bauer M (2014) Betätigungsfeld psychosoziale Gesundheitsförderung im schulischen Setting – ein Pilotprojekt an der FH WN. Ergotherapie 2:22–26Google Scholar
  2. Bergold J, Thomas S (2012) Partizipative Forschungsmethoden: Ein methodischer Ansatz in Bewegung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 13 (1), Art. 30. www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1801/3332
  3. Cockburn L, Barry T (2003) Participatory action research: integrating community occupational therapy practice and research. Human Resources Abstracts 38 (1): 5–136Google Scholar
  4. Felt U, Nowotny H, Taschwer K (1995) Wissenschaftsforschung: eine Einführung. Campus, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  5. Heinzelmann A (2014) Erfahrungsreise Impulsholz. Partizipation mit Methode. Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Fakultät für Interdisziplinäre Forschung und Fortbildung, WienGoogle Scholar
  6. Heitink E, Satink T (2014) The challenge to co-operate with students in research for an optimal learning experience and research. Paper presented at the European Network of Occupational Therapy in Higher Education (ENOTHE), YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Hockley JM, Froggatt K, Heimerl K (2013) Participatory research in palliative care: actions and reflections. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Hopf C (2002) Forschungsethik und qualitative Forschung. In: Flick U, v. Kardoff E, Steinke I (eds) Qualitative Sozialforschung: eine Einführung. Rowohlt, Reinbek, pp 589–600Google Scholar
  9. Minkler M, Wallerstein N (2008) Introduction to community based participatory research. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds) Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  10. Plunger P, Heimerl K, Tatzer VC, Zepke G, Klicpera D, Hoorman L, Reitinger E (2014) Perspectives of community pharmacy staff on caring for people living with dementia and their caregivers – findings from a participatory research project with community pharmacies in Austria. Paper presented at the 24th Alzheimer Europe Conference 2014, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  11. Reitinger E, Krainer L, Zepke G, Lehner E (2014). Kommunikation beobachten, ihr einen Rahmen geben und sie reflektieren. In: Dressel G, Berger W, Heimerl K, Winiwarter V (eds) Interdisziplinär und transdisziplinär forschen. Praktiken und Methoden. Transcript, Bielefeld, S 135–150Google Scholar
  12. Tatzer VC, Natlacen M, Croy A, Plunger P, Reitinger E, Heimerl K (2014) Everyday experiences, needs and innovative ideas of caregivers of people with dementia-findings from a participatory project with community pharmacies. Paper presented at the 24th Alzheimer Europe Conference 2014, Glasgow, www.alzheimer-europe.org/Conferences/2014-Glasgow/Detailed-Programme-and-abstracts/PO51-PO100
  13. Taylor RR, Braveman B, Hammel J (2004) Developing and evaluating community-based services through participatory action research: two case examples. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 58 (1): 73–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. von Unger H (2012) Partizipative Gesundheitsforschung: Wer partizipiert woran? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1781
  15. von Unger H (2014) Partizipative Forschung. Einführung in die Forschungspraxis. Springer VS, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  16. Wegleitner K, Heimerl K, Kellehear A (2015) Compassionate communities: case studies from Britain and Europe. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.3.9

  1. Bauernfeind B, Aringer M, Prodinger B, Kirchberger I, Machold K, Smolen J, Stamm T (2008) Identification of relevant concepts of functioning in daily life in people with systemic lupus erythematosus: A patient Delphi exercise. Arthritis Rheum 61 (1): 21–28Google Scholar
  2. Stamm TA, Cieza A, Coenen M, Machold KP, Nell VK, Smolen JS, Stucki G (2005) Validating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Comprehensive Core Set for Rheumatoid Arthritis from the patient perspective: a qualitative study. Arthritis Rheum 53 (3): 431–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Stamm TA, Mattsson M, Mihai C, Stocker J, Binder A, Bauernfeind B, Bostrom C (2011) Concepts of functioning and health important to people with systemic sclerosis: a qualitative study in four European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 70 (6): 1074–1079PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.4

  1. Bortz J, Döring N (2006) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation, 4th ed. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  2. DePoy E, Gitlin LN (2005) Introduction to research: Understanding and applying multiple strategies, 3rd ed. Elsevier Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  3. Dicicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF (2006) The qualitative research interview. Medical Education 40 (4): 314–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Flick U (2007) Qualitative Sozialforschung: eine Einführung, 6. Aufl. Rowohlt, ReinbekGoogle Scholar
  5. Girtler R (2001) Methoden der Feldforschung, 4. Aufl. UTB, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  6. Kielhofner G (2006) Research in occupational therapy methods of inquiry for enhancing practice. Davis, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Krippendorff K (2012) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  8. Krueger RA (1997) Developing questions for focus groups. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  9. Krueger RA, Casey MA (2014) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 5th ed. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  10. Lamnek S, Krell C (2005) Qualitative Sozialforschung: Lehrbuch, Aufl. Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  11. Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Gnip C (2007) Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 31 (1): 3–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J (2001) Pflegeforschung: Methoden – Bewertung – Anwendung, 2. Aufl. Elsevier, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  13. Merkens H (2010) Teilnehmende Beobachtung: Analyse von Protokollen teilnehmender Beobachter. In: Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik JHP (ed) Analyse verbaler Daten. Westdeutscher Verlag, OpladenGoogle Scholar
  14. Petty NJ, Thomson OP, Stew G (2012) Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 2: Introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods. Manual Therapy 17 (5): 378–84PubMedGoogle Scholar

Literatur zu Abschn. 6.5

  1. Cope DG (2014) Methods and meanings: credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Journal 41 (1): 89–91Google Scholar
  2. Creswell JW (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  3. Curtin M, Fossey E (2007) Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 54: 88–94Google Scholar
  4. DePoy E, Gitlin LN (2005) Introduction to research. Understanding and applying multiple strategies. Elsevier Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  5. Letts L, Wilkins S, Law M, Stewart D, Bosch J, Westmorland M (2007a) Critical review form – qualitative studies (version 2.0). McMaster University, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
  6. Letts L, Wilkins S, Law M, Stewart D, Bosch J, Westmorland M (2007b) Guidelines for critical review form: qualitative studies (version2.0). McMaster University, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
  7. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic Inqiry. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  8. LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J (2005) Pflegeforschung. Methoden, Bewertung, Anwendung. Elsevier, MünchenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Open Access Dieses Kapitel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell 2.5 International Lizenz (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/deed.de) veröffentlicht, welche die nicht-kommerzielle Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden.

Die in diesem Kapitel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist auch für die oben aufgeführten nicht-kommerziellen Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne Perkhofer
    • 1
  • Verena Gebhart
    • 2
  • Gerhard Tucek
    • 3
  • Frederick J. Wertz
    • 4
  • Roman Weigl
    • 5
  • Valentin Ritschl
    • 6
  • Helmut Ritschl
    • 7
  • Barbara Höhsl
    • 8
  • Barbara Prinz-Buchberger
    • 9
  • Tanja Stamm
    • 10
  • Julie S. Mewes
    • 11
  • Martin Maasz
    • 12
  • Christine Chapparo
    • 13
  • Verena C. Tatzer
    • 14
  • Petra Plunger
    • 15
  • Elisabeth Reitinger
    • 16
  • Katharina Heimerl
    • 17
  1. 1.fh gesundheit – Zentrum für Gesundheitsberufe Tirol GmbHInnsbruckDeutschland
  2. 2.AZW Ausbildungszentrum West für Gesundheitsberufe der Tirol Kliniken GmbHInnsbruckDeutschland
  3. 3.IMC Fachhochschule KremsDepartment of HealthKremsDeutschland
  4. 4.Fordham UniversityDepartment of PsychologyBronxUSA
  5. 5.Klinische Abteilung für Kinder- und JugendheilkundeUniversitätsklinikum St. Pölten Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für GesundheitswissenschaftenSt. PöltenDeutschland
  6. 6.Medizinische Universität WienInstitut für Outcomes ResearchZentrum für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Intelligente SystemeWienDeutschland
  7. 7.FH Joanneum GrazRadiologietechnologieGrazDeutschland
  8. 8.IMC Fachhochschule KremsKremsDeutschland
  9. 9.IMC Fachhochschule KremsKremsDeutschland
  10. 10.Medizinische Universität WienInstitut für Outcomes ResearchZentrum für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Intelligente SystemeWienDeutschland
  11. 11.Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinInstitut für Europäische EthnologieBerlinDeutschland
  12. 12.FH Campus WienBachelorstudiengang Logopädie – Phoniatrie – AudiologieWienDeutschland
  13. 13.University of SydneyFaculty of Health Sciences Discipline of Occupational TherapyLidcombe NSWAustralia
  14. 14.AZW Ausbildungszentrum West für Gesundheitsberufe der Tirol Kliniken GmbHInnsbruckDeutschland
  15. 15.Alpen Adria Universität Klagenfurt Wien GrazWienGermany
  16. 16.Fakultät Alpen Adria Universität Klagenfurt Wien Graz interdisziplinäre Forschung und FortbildungInstitut für Palliative Care und OrganisationsEthikWienDeutschland
  17. 17.Fakultät für interdisziplinäre Forschung und FortbildungInstitut für Palliative Care und OrganisationsEthikWienDeutschland

Personalised recommendations