Advertisement

Product and Labor Market Entry Costs, Underemployment and International Trade

  • Spiros BougheasEmail author
  • Raymond Riezman
Chapter
  • 3.5k Downloads

Abstract

We develop a small, open economy, two-sector model with heterogeneous agents and endogenous participation in a labor matching market. There are two types of agents: workers and entrepreneurs. Both populations are heterogeneous. Workers are distinguished by their potential ability as skilled workers and entrepreneurs by their potential ability to manage a firm. To capture the notion of decentralized labor markets we assume random matching. Those agents on the long side of the market who are not matched find employment in the unskilled sector as do those agents who decided not to attempt to enter the matching market. The output of matched pairs is a function of the two partners’ abilities. We find that disparities in labor institutions become a source of comparative advantage. The exact patterns will depend not only on the costs of entering the skilled sector but also on the mechanism used for dividing the surplus. We analyze the implications of asymmetric market entry costs for the patterns of international trade and underemployment. We find that if labor market inefficiencies are sufficiently strong trade liberalization can lead to welfare losses. We also examine the robustness of our results when we allow for complementarities in the production function and for alternative matching mechanisms.

Keywords

Labor Market Comparative Advantage Matched Pair Sharing Rule Entry Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank participants at the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory Conference, Ischia 2009, the Mid-West International Economics Meeting, Evanston, 2010, the GEP Annual Conference, University of Nottingham 2010, the CESifo Area Conference on Global Economy, Munich, 2011, the Conference on Worker-Specific Effects of Globalization, Tubingen, 2011, the ETSG Conference, Copenhagen, 2011, the Conference on Globalization: Strategies and Effects, Kolding Denmark, 2011 and seminar participants at ECARES, Brussels, 2011, the University of Southern California, 2012 and the University of Tennessee, 2012 for helpful comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. (1996). A microfoundation for social increasing returns in human capital accumulation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 779–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alós-Ferrer, C. (2002). Random matching of several infinite populations. Annals of Operations Research, 114, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, D., & Blanchflower, D. (2011). Underemployment in the UK in the great recession. National Institute Economic Review 215, R23–R33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bougheas, S., & Riezman, R. (2007). Trade and the distribution of human capital. Journal of International Economics, 73, 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brixiova, Z., Li, W., & Yousef, T. (2009). Skill shortages and labor market outcomes in Central Europe. Economic Systems 33, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costinot, A., & Fogel, J. (2009). Matching and inequality in the world economy. Journal of Political Economy, 118, 747–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson, C., & Matusz, S. (2006). Trade liberalization and compensation. International Economic Review, 47, 723–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davidson, C., Martin, L., & Matusz, S. (1999). Trade and search generated unemployment. Journal of International Economics, 48, 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson, C., Matusz, S., & Nelson, D. (2006). Can compensation save free trade. Journal of International Economics, 71, 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson, C., Matusz, S., & Shevchenko, A. (2008). Globalization and firm level adjustment with imperfect labor markets. Journal of International Economics, 75, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, D. (1998a). Does European unemployment prop up American wages? National labor markets and global trade. American Economic Review, 88, 478–494.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, D. (1998b). Technology, unemployment, and relative wages in a global economy. European Economic Review, 42, 1613–1633.Google Scholar
  13. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egger, H., & Kreickemeier, U. (2012). Fairness, trade and inequality. Journal of International Economics, 86, 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan, C., Overland, J., & Spagat, M. (1999). Human capital, growth and inequality in Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 27, 618–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Felbermayr, G., Prat, J., & Schmerer, H.-J. (2011). Globalization and labor market outcomes: Wage bargaining, search frictions and firm heterogeneity. Journal of Economic Theory, 146, 39–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Felbermayr, G., Larch, M., & Lechthaler, W. (2013). Unemployment in an interdependent world. American Economic Journal - Economic Policy, 5(1), 262–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grossman, G., & Maggi, G. (2000). Diversity and trade. American Economic Review, 90, 1255–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helpman, E., Itskhoki, O., & Redding, S. (2010). Inequality and unemployment in a global economy. Econometrica, 78, 1239–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hosios, A. (1990). On the efficiency of matching and related models of search and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies, 57, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kreickemeier, U., & Nelson, D. (2006). Fair wages, unemployment and technological change in a global economy. Journal of International Economics, 70, 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krugman, P. (1995). Growing world trade: causes and consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 327–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lusk, E., & Wright, H. (1982). Deriving the probability density for sums of uniform random variables. The American Statistician, 36, 128–130.Google Scholar
  24. Maynard, D., Joseph, T., & Maynard, A. (2006). Underemployment, job attitudes, and turnover intentions. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 509–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGuiness, S. (2006). Overeducation in the labor market. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20, 387–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKee-Ryan, F., & Harvey, J. (2011). I have a job but…: A review of underemployment. Journal of Management, 37, 962–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mortensen, D., & Wright, R. (2002). Competitive pricing and efficiency in search equilibrium. International Economic Review, 43, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohnsorge, F., & Trefler, D. (2007). Sorting it out: International trade with heterogeneous workers. Journal of Political Economy, 115, 868–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Redding, S. (1996). The low-skill, low-quality trap: strategic complementarities between human capital and R&D. Economic Journal, 106, 458–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sly, N. (2012). International productivity differences, trade and the distribution of factor endowments. Review of International Economics, 20(4), 740–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Snower, D. (1996). The low-skill, bad-job trap. In A. Booth, & D. Snower (Eds.), Acquiring skills: Market failures, their symptoms, and policy responses. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.University of Iowa, GEP, CESifoIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations