Advertisement

A Community-Built Virtual Heritage Collection

  • Helen C. Miles
  • Andrew T. Wilson
  • Frédéric Labrosse
  • Bernard Tiddeman
  • Jonathan C. Roberts
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9550)

Abstract

The HeritageTogether project has developed a web platform through which members of the public can upload their own photographs of heritage assets to be processed into 3D models using an automated Structure-from-Motion work flow. The web platform is part of a larger project which aims to capture, create and archive digital heritage assets in conjunction with local communities in Wales, UK, with a focus on megalithic monuments. The 3D models are displayed online using a lightbox style gallery and a virtual museum, while the large amounts of additional data produced are stored in an online archive. Each representation provides a different perspective and context to the data, allowing users to explore the data in a multitude of ways. HeritageTogether is a digital community and community-built archive and museum of heritage data, developed to inspire local communities to learn more about their heritage and to help to preserve it.

Keywords

Structure-from-Motion Co-production Archaeology 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge the AHRC (UK) AH/L007916/1 for funding “co-production of alternative views of lost heritage of Gwynedd” (http://heritagetogether.org), and members of our research team and digital community for their continued involvement in this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Linder, W.: Digital Photogrammetry: A Practical Course, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGlone, J.C.: Manual of Photogrammetry, 6th edn. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yilmaz, H., Yakar, M., Gulec, S., Dulgerler, O.: Importance of digital close-range photogrammetry in documentation of cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 8, 428–433 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kjellman, E.: From 2D to 3D: A Photogrammetric Revolution in Archaeology?. University of Tromsø, Norway (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grussenmeyer, P., Yasmine, J.: Photogrammetry for the preparation of archaeological excavation. a 3D restitution according to modern and archive images of Beaufort Castle landscape (Lebanon). In: International Society Photogrammetry, pp. 809–814 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Reu, J., De Smedt, P., Herremans, D., Van Meirvenne, M., Laloo, P., De Clercq, W.: On introducing an image-based 3D reconstruction method in archaeological excavation practice. J. Archaeol. Sci. 41, 251–262 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bitelli, G., Girelli, V.A., Remondino, F., Vittuari, L.: Surface modelling of complex archaelogical structures by digital close-range photogrammetry. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. In. 1568, 321–327 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ducke, B., Score, D., Reeves, J.: Multiview 3D reconstruction of the archaeological site at Weymouth from image series. Comput. Graph. 35, 375–382 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green, S., Bevan, A., Shapland, M.: A comparative assessment of structure from motion methods for archaeological research. J. Archaeol. Sci. 46, 173–181 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fujii, Y., Fodde, E., Watanabe, K., Murakami, K.: Digital photogrammetry for the documentation of structural damage in earthen archaeological sites: the case of Ajina Tepa. Tajikistan. Eng. Geol. 105, 124–133 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mudge, M., Schroer, C., Earl, G., Martinez, K., Pagi, H., Toler-Franklin, C., Rusinkiewicz, S., Palma, G., Wachowiak, M., Ashley, M., Matthews, N., Noble, T., Dellepiane, M.: Principles and practices of robust, photography-based digital imaging techniques for museums. In: Artusi, A., Joly, M., Lucet, G., Pitzalis, D., Ribes, A. (eds.) International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (VAST), pp. 111–137. The Eurographics Association (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miles, H.C., Wilson, A.T., Labrosse, F., Tiddeman, B., Griffiths, S., Edwards, B., Ritsos, P.D., Mearman, J.W., Möller, K., Karl, R., Roberts, J.C.: Alternative representations of 3D-reconstructed heritage data. ACM J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 9(1), 1–18 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koenderink, J.J., van Doorn, A.J.: Affine structure from motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 8, 377–385 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Westoby, M., Brasington, J., Glasser, N., Hambrey, M., Reynolds, J.: ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 179, 300–314 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vergauwen, M., Van Gool, L.: Web-based 3D reconstruction service. Mach. vision Appl. 17, 411–426 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Gool, L., Tingdahl, D.: A public system for image based 3D model generation. In: Gagalowicz, A., Philips, W. (eds.) MIRAGE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6930, pp. 262–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grussenmeyer, P., Drap, P., Gaillard, G,: ARPENTEUR 3.0: recent developments in web based photogrammetry. ISPRS Archives, vol. XXXIV, part 6 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Snavely, N., Seitz, S.M., Szeliski, R.: Photo tourism: exploring photo collections in 3D. ACM T. Graphic 25, 835–846 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Snavely, N., Garg, R., Seitz, S.M., Szeliski, R.: Finding paths through the world’s photos. ACM T. Graphic 27, 11–21 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Snavely, N., Seitz, S.M., Szeliski, R.: Modeling the world from internet photo collections. Int. J. Comput. Vision 80, 189–210 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Agarwal, S., Furukawa, Y., Snavely, N., Simon, I., Curless, B., Seitz, S.M., Szeliski, R.: Building Rome in a day. Commun. ACM 54, 105–112 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carrozzino, M., Bruno, N., Bergamasco, M.: Designing interaction metaphors for web3D cultural dissemination. J. Cult. Herit. 14, 146–155 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peebles, G.: Sharing data, swapping knowledge, and building community: moving archaeology from deep storage into the public eye through the internet. In: International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). CAA (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Payne, A., Cole, K.: Designing the next generation virtual museum: making 3D artifacts available for viewing and download. In: International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). CAA (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Petridis, P., Dunwell, I., Liarokapis, F., Constantinou, G., Arnab, S., de Freitas, S., Hendrix, M.: The herbert virtual museum. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2013, 1–8 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tedd, L.A.: People’s collection wales: online access to the heritage of wales from museums, archives and libraries. Program 45, 333–345 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bonacchi, C., Bevan, A., Pett, D., Keinan-Schoonbaert, A.: Developing crowd- and community-fuelled archaeological research. Early results from the MicroPasts project. In: International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). CAA (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Evans, A., Romeo, M., Bahrehmand, A., Agenjo, J., Blat, J.: 3D graphics on the web: a survey. Comput. Graph. 41, 43–61 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rushmeier, H.E., Rogowitz, B.E., Piatko, C.: Perceptual issues in substituting texture for geometry. In: Rogowitz, B.E., Pappas, T.N. (eds.) Human Vision and Electronic Imaging V, vol. 3959, pp. 372–383. SPIE (2000)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Behr, J., Eschler, P., Jung, Y., Zöllner, M.: X3DOM: a DOM-based HTML5/X3D integration model. In: Spencer, S.N. (ed.) ACM International Conference on 3D Web Technology (Web3D), pp. 127–135. ACM Press, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lowe, D.G.: Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 1150–1157. IEEE (1999)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vedaldi, A., Fulkerson, B.: VLFeat: an open and portable library of computer vision algorithms. In: del Bimbo, A., Chang, S. (eds.) ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM), pp. 1469–1472. ACM Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lazebnik, S., Furukawa, Y., Ponce, J.: Projective visual hulls. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 74, 137–165 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Furukawa, Y., Curless, B., Seitz, S.M., Szeliski, R.: Towards internet-scale multi-view stereo. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1434–1441. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kazhdan, M., Bolitho, M., Hoppe, H.: Poisson surface reconstruction. In: Polthier, K., Sheffer, A. (eds.) Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing (SGP), pp. 61–70. Eurographics Association (2006)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Corsini, M., Dellepiane, M., Ponchio, F., Scopigno, R.: Image-to-geometry registration: a mutual information method exploiting illumination-related geometric properties. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 28, pp. 1755–1764. Wiley-Blackwell (2009)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Garland, M., Heckbert, P.S.: Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In: Owen, G.S., Whitted, T., Mones-Hattal, B. (eds.) 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH), pp. 209–21. ACM Press, New York (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lake, M.: Open archaeology. World Archaeol. 44, 471–478 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hayashi, M., Bachelder, S., Nakajima, M., Iguchi, A.: A new virtual museum equipped with automatic video content generator. In: Iglesias, A., Shinya, M., Galvez-Tomida, A. (eds.) International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW), pp. 377–383. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen C. Miles
    • 1
  • Andrew T. Wilson
    • 2
  • Frédéric Labrosse
    • 1
  • Bernard Tiddeman
    • 1
  • Jonathan C. Roberts
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceAberystwyth UniversityAberystwythUK
  2. 2.School of Computer ScienceBangor UniversityBangorUK

Personalised recommendations