Advertisement

New Realizations of Somewhere Statistically Binding Hashing and Positional Accumulators

  • Tatsuaki OkamotoEmail author
  • Krzysztof Pietrzak
  • Brent Waters
  • Daniel Wichs
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9452)

Abstract

A somewhere statistically binding (SSB) hash, introduced by Hubáček and Wichs (ITCS ’15), can be used to hash a long string x to a short digest \(y = H_{\mathsf {hk}}(x)\) using a public hashing-key \(\mathsf {hk}\). Furthermore, there is a way to set up the hash key \(\mathsf {hk}\) to make it statistically binding on some arbitrary hidden position i, meaning that: (1) the digest y completely determines the i’th bit (or symbol) of x so that all pre-images of y have the same value in the i’th position, (2) it is computationally infeasible to distinguish the position i on which \(\mathsf {hk}\) is statistically binding from any other position \(i'\). Lastly, the hash should have a local opening property analogous to Merkle-Tree hashing, meaning that given x and \(y = H_{\mathsf {hk}}(x)\) it should be possible to create a short proof \(\pi \) that certifies the value of the i’th bit (or symbol) of x without having to provide the entire input x. A similar primitive called a positional accumulator, introduced by Koppula, Lewko and Waters (STOC ’15) further supports dynamic updates of the hashed value. These tools, which are interesting in their own right, also serve as one of the main technical components in several recent works building advanced applications from indistinguishability obfuscation (iO).

The prior constructions of SSB hashing and positional accumulators required fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) and iO respectively. In this work, we give new constructions of these tools based on well studied number-theoretic assumptions such as DDH, Phi-Hiding and DCR, as well as a general construction from lossy/injective functions.

References

  1. [BdM93]
    Benaloh, J.C., de Mare, M.: One-way accumulators: a decentralized alternative to digital signatures. In: Helleseth, T. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1993. LNCS, vol. 765, pp. 274–285. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [BGI+12]
    Barak, B., Goldreich, O., Impagliazzo, R., Rudich, S., Sahai, A., Vadhan, S.P., Yang, K.: On the (im)possibility of obfuscating programs. J. ACM 59(2), 6 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [BHK11]
    Braverman, M., Hassidim, A., Kalai, Y.T.: Leaky pseudo-entropy functions. In: Proceedings of the Innovations in Computer Science - ICS 2010, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 7–9 January 2011, pp. 353–366 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. [CCC+15]
    Chen, Y.C., Chow, S.S., Chung, K.M., Lai, R.W., Lin, W.K., Zhou, H.S.: Computation-trace indistinguishability obfuscation and its applications. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2015/406 (2015). http://eprint.iacr.org/
  5. [CH15]
    Canetti, R., Holmgren, J.: Fully succinct garbled RAM. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2015/388 (2015). http://eprint.iacr.org/
  6. [CMS99]
    Cachin, C., Micali, S., Stadler, M.A.: Computationally private information retrieval with polylogarithmic communication. In: Stern, J. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1592, p. 402. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [DJ01]
    Damgård, I., Jurik, M.: A generalisation, a simplification and some applications of Paillier’s probabilistic public-key system. In: Kim, K. (ed.) PKC 2001. LNCS, vol. 1992, pp. 119–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [GGH+13]
    Garg, S., Gentry, C., Halevi, S., Raykova, M., Sahai, A., Waters, B.: Candidate indistinguishability obfuscation and functional encryption for all circuits. In: FOCS (2013)Google Scholar
  9. [HW15]
    Hubacek, P., Wichs, D.: On the communication complexity of secure function evaluation with long output. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, ITCS 2015, Rehovot, Israel, 11–13 January 2015, pp. 163–172 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. [KLW15]
    Koppula, V., Lewko, A.B., Waters, B.: Indistinguishability obfuscation for turing machines with unbounded memory. In: STOC (2015)Google Scholar
  11. [KOS10]
    Kiltz, E., O’Neill, A., Smith, A.: Instantiability of RSA-OAEP under chosen-plaintext attack. In: Rabin, T. (ed.) CRYPTO 2010. LNCS, vol. 6223, pp. 295–313. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [Lip05]
    Lipmaa, H.: An oblivious transfer protocol with log-squared communication. In: Zhou, J., López, J., Deng, R.H., Bao, F. (eds.) ISC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3650, pp. 314–328. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [NS12]
    Naor, M., Segev, G.: Public-key cryptosystems resilient to key leakage. SIAM J. Comput. 41(4), 772–814 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [Pai99]
    Paillier, P.: Public-key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes. In: Stern, J. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1592, pp. 223–238. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [PW08]
    Peikert, C., Waters, B.: Lossy trapdoor functions and their applications. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 17–20 May 2008, pp. 187–196 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. [SW14]
    Sahai, A., Waters, B.: How to use indistinguishability obfuscation: deniable encryption, and more. In: STOC, pp. 475–484 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. [Zha14]
    Zhandry, M.: Adaptively secure broadcast encryption with small system parameters. In: IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2014, p. 757 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Cryptologc Research 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatsuaki Okamoto
    • 1
    Email author
  • Krzysztof Pietrzak
    • 2
  • Brent Waters
    • 3
  • Daniel Wichs
    • 4
  1. 1.NTT LaboratoriesTokyoJapan
  2. 2.IST AustriaKlosterneuburgAustria
  3. 3.UT AustinAustinUSA
  4. 4.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations