Procedural Rights in EU Administrative Competition Proceedings: Ex Ante Mergers

  • Anca D. ChiritaEmail author
Part of the China-EU Law Series book series (CELS, volume 3)


The present contribution has two inter-related purposes: first, to analyse the context and legal framework of procedural rights in EU competition law, in particular, the administrative notification of mergers, and second, to critically review any perceived flaws in the substantive, institutional design or exercise of these procedural rights in practice, thereby offering proposals for institutional reform.


European Union European Commission Competition Authority Merger Control Merger Proceeding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahlborn C (2002) Comment: Airtours/First Choice: CFI Clips MTF’s Wings. Available at
  2. Albers M, Jourdan J (2011) The role of hearing officers in EU competition proceedings: a historical and practical perspective. J Eur Competition Law Pract 2(3):5−24Google Scholar
  3. Araujo M (2005) The respect of fundamental rights within the European network of competition authorities. In: Hawk BE (ed) 2004 Annual proceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute – international antitrust law and policy, Juris Publishing, Huntington, p 511Google Scholar
  4. Arhold C (2002) Grünbuch der Kommission über die Revision der europäischen Fusionskontrolle oder: Das Bundeskartellamt schlägt zurück. Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht 14:449–460Google Scholar
  5. Basedow J (2003) Gemeinschaftsrechtliche Grenzen der Ministererlaubnis in der Fusionskontrolle: Zum Verhältnis des § GWB § 42 GWB zu den Art. EG Artikel 81 und EG Artikel 82 EG, EuZW 44−50Google Scholar
  6. Bellamy Sir C (2010) An EU competition court: the continuing debate. In: Ioannis I, Kokkoris I (eds) The reform of EC competition law: new challenges. Kluwer Law International, The Netherlands, pp 33–53Google Scholar
  7. Blanco LO (ed) (2013) EU competition procedure, 3rd edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanco LO, Jörgens K (2011) Important developments in the field of EU competition procedure. J Eur Competition Law Pract 2(6):11−18Google Scholar
  9. Bronckers M, Vallery A (2011) No longer presumed guilty? The impact of fundamental rights on certain dogmas of EU competition law. World Competiton 34(4):535–570Google Scholar
  10. Celli R, Drauz G, English M, Jeffs C, Kinsella S, Melin H, Powell MD, Riis-Madsen C, Rowland P (2010) Transparency and process: do we need a new mandate for the hearing officer? Eur Competiton J 6: 475−479Google Scholar
  11. Chen Z (2008) Probleme der europäischen Fusionskontrolle nach der Reform der FKVO: eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung der Fusionskontrolle in der EU und den USA und ihre Auswirkungen auf das chinesische Antimonopolgesetz. Verlag Dr. Kovac, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  12. Christensen P, Fountoukakos K, Sjöblom D (2007) Merger regulation procedure. In: Faull J, Nikpay A (eds) The EC law of competition. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Christiansen A (2010) Der ‘More Economic Approach’ in der EU-Fusionskontrolle: Entwicklung, konzeptionelle Grundlagen und kritische Analyse. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a. MainGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowen T (2008) Justice delayed is justice denied: the rule of law, economic development and the future of the European Community courts. Eur Competition J 4:1–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cumming G (2012) Merger decisions and the rules of procedure of the European Community courts. Kluwer Law International, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  16. Duso T, Gugler K, Yurtoglu BB (2011) How effective is European merger control? Eur Econ Rev 55:980–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forrester I (2009) Due process in EC competition cases: a distinguished institution with flawed procedures. Eur Law Rev 34:817−843Google Scholar
  18. Forwood JN (2014) Foreword. In: Faull J, Nikpay A, Taylor D (eds) The law of competition, 3rd edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Goddin G (2013) Access to documents in competition files: where do we stand, two years after TGI? J Eur Competiton Law Pract 4:3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graham C (2013) Public interest mergers. Eur Competition J 9:383–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant J, Neven DJ (2005) The attempted merger between general electric and Honeywell: a case study of transatlantic conflict. J Competition Law Econ 3(1):595–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray M, Lester M, Darbon C, Fecenna G, Brown C, Holmes E (2006) EU competition law: procedures and remedies. Richmond Law & Tax Ltd, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirsch G, Montag F, Säcker J (eds) (2008) Competition law: European Community practice and procedure: article-by-article commentary. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Holles B (2013) The hearing officer: thirty years protecting the right to be heard. World Competition 36(1):5–32Google Scholar
  25. Holtz J (2013) Legal professional privilege in Europe: a missed policy opportunity. J Eur Comp Law Pract 4(5):9−26Google Scholar
  26. Kekelekis M (2006) The EC merger control regulation: rights of defence. A critical analysis of DG COMP practice and community courts. Jurisprudence. Kluwer Law International, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerse CS, Khan N (2005) EC antitrust procedure, 5th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Kerse CS, Khan N (2012) EU antitrust procedure, 6th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Klees A (2005) Europäisches Kartellverfahrensrecht mit Fusionskontrollverfahren. Carl Heymanns Verlag, CologneGoogle Scholar
  30. Kokkoris I (2009) Assessment of coordinated effects under the European Community merger regulation. Sakkoulas Publishers, AthensGoogle Scholar
  31. Kokkoris I, Katona K (2009) A critical analysis off the ECMR reform. In: Lianos I, Kokkoris I (eds) The reform of EC competition law: new challenges. Kluwer Law International, The Netherlands, pp 437–476Google Scholar
  32. Laguna de Paz JC (2014) Understanding the limits of judicial review in European competition law. J Antitrust Enforcement 2(1):3−31Google Scholar
  33. MacGregor A, Gecic B (2012) Due process in EU competition cases following the introduction of the new best practices guidelines on antitrust proceedings. J Eur Competition Law Pract 3(5):425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mestmäcker/Veelken (2007) § 42 GWB. In: Immenga/Mestmäcker (eds) Wettbewerbsrecht, 4th edn. CH BeckGoogle Scholar
  35. Mole N, Harby C (2006) A guide to the implementation of Article 6 of the European convention on human rights. Human rights handbook, 2nd edn. Council of Europe Publishing, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  36. Monti M (2002) Review of the EC merger regulation – roadmap for the reform project. Available at
  37. Navarro E, Font A, Folguera J, Briones J (2005) Merger control in the EU, 2nd edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Phillipson G, Williams A (2011) Horizontal effect and the constitutional constraint. Mod Law Rev 74(6):878–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rose V, Bailey D (eds) (2013) Bellamy & child, European Union law of competition, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenthal M, Thomas S (2010) European merger control. CH Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwalbe U, Zimmer D (2009) Law and economics in European merger control. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Slater D, Thomas S, Waelbroeck D (2008) Competition law proceedings before the European Commission and the right to a fair trial: no need for reform. GCLC Working Paper 04/08Google Scholar
  43. Temple Lang J (2013) The strength and weakness of the DG competition manual of procedure. J Antitrust Enforcement 1(1):3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Whish R, Bailey D (2012) Competition law, 7th edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Wils WPJ (2003) Self-incrimination in EC antitrust enforcement: a legal and economic analysis. World Competition 26(4):567–588Google Scholar
  46. Wils WPJ (2004) The combination of the investigative and prosecutorial function and the adjudicative function in EC antitrust enforcement: a legal and economic analysis. World Competition 27:201–224Google Scholar
  47. Wils WPJ (2005) Principles of European antitrust enforcement. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Wils WPJ (2008) Efficiency and justice in European antitrust enforcement. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Wils WPJ (2010) The increased level of EU antitrust fines. Judicial review and the ECHR. World Competition Law Econ Rev 33:5–29Google Scholar
  50. Wils WPJ (2011) EU antitrust enforcement powers and procedural rights and guarantees: the interplay between EU law, national law, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and the European Convention on Human Rights. World Competition 34(2):189–213Google Scholar
  51. Wils WPJ (2012) The role of the hearing officer in competition proceedings before the European Commission. World Competition 35(3):431–456Google Scholar
  52. Witt AC (2012) From Airtours to Ryanair: is the more economic approach to EU merger law really about more economics? Common Mark Law Rev 49:217–246Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Durham Law SchoolDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations