International Symposium on Distributed Computing

Distributed Computing pp 16-30 | Cite as

Efficient Counting with Optimal Resilience

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9363)

Abstract

In the synchronous c-counting problem, we are given a synchronous system of n nodes, where up to f of the nodes may be Byzantine, that is, have arbitrary faulty behaviour. The task is to have all of the correct nodes count modulo c in unison in a self-stabilising manner: regardless of the initial state of the system and the faulty nodes’ behavior, eventually rounds are consistently labelled by a counter modulo c at all correct nodes.

We provide a deterministic solution with resilience \(f<n/3\) that stabilises in O(f) rounds and every correct node broadcasts \(O(\log ^2 f)\) bits per round. We build and improve on a recent result offering stabilisation time O(f) and communication complexity \(O(\log ^2 f /\log \log f)\) but with sub-optimal resilience \(f = n^{1-o(1)}\) (PODC 2015). Our new algorithm has optimal resilience, asymptotically optimal stabilisation time, and low communication complexity. Finally, we modify the algorithm to guarantee that after stabilisation very little communication occurs. In particular, for optimal resilience and polynomial counter size \(c=n^{O(1)}\), the algorithm broadcasts only O(1) bits per node every \(\Theta (n)\) rounds without affecting the other properties of the algorithm; communication-wise this is asymptotically optimal.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ben-Or, M., Dolev, D., Hoch, E.N.: Fast self-stabilizing Byzantine tolerant digital clock synchronization. In: Proc. 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2008), pp. 385–394. ACM Press (2008). doi:10.1145/1400751.1400802
  2. 2.
    Berman, P., Garay, J.A., Perry, K.J.: Towards optimal distributed consensus. In: Proc. 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 1989). pp. 410–415. IEEE (1989). doi:10.1109/SFCS.1989.63511
  3. 3.
    Dolev, D., Heljanko, K., Järvisalo, M., Korhonen, J.H., Lenzen, C., Rybicki, J., Suomela, J., Wieringa, S.: Synchronous counting and computational algorithm design (2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.5719v2
  4. 4.
    Dolev, D., Hoch, E.N.: On Self-stabilizing synchronous actions despite Byzantine attacks. In: Pelc, A. (ed.) DISC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4731, pp. 193–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dolev, D., Korhonen, J.H., Lenzen, C., Rybicki, J., Suomela, J.: Synchronous counting and computational algorithm design. In: Higashino, T., Katayama, Y., Masuzawa, T., Potop-Butucaru, M., Yamashita, M. (eds.) SSS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8255, pp. 237–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dolev, D., Reischuk, R.: Bounds on information exchange for Byzantine agreement. Journal of the ACM 32(1), 191–204 (1985). doi:10.1145/2455.214112 MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dolev, S.: Self-Stabilization. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000) MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dolev, S., Welch, J.L.: Self-stabilizing clock synchronization in the presence of Byzantine faults. Journal of the ACM 51(5), 780–799 (2004). doi:10.1145/1017460.1017463 MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A.: A lower bound for the time to assure interactive consistency. Information Processing Letters 14(4), 183–186 (1982). doi:10.1016/0020-0190(82)90033-3 MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoch, E.N., Dolev, D., Daliot, A.: Self-stabilizing Byzantine digital clock synchronization. In: Datta, A.K., Gradinariu, M. (eds.) SSS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4280, pp. 350–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lenzen, C., Rybicki, J.: Efficient counting with optimal resilience (2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.02535
  12. 12.
    Lenzen, C., Rybicki, J., Suomela, J.: Towards optimal synchronous counting. In: Proc. 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2015), pp. 441–450. ACM Press (2015). doi:10.1145/2767386.2767423
  13. 13.
    Pease, M.C., Shostak, R.E., Lamport, L.: Reaching agreement in the presence of faults. Journal of the ACM 27(2), 228–234 (1980). doi:10.1145/322186.322188 MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for InformaticsSaarbrückenGermany
  2. 2.Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer ScienceAalto UniversityEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations