International Workshop on ICTs for Improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques

ICTs for Improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques pp 155-167 | Cite as

Measuring Stereoacuity by 3D Technology

  • Angelo Gargantini
  • Giancarlo Facoetti
  • Andrea Vitali
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 515)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel method for measuring with great precision the stereoacuity, that is the smallest depth difference that can be detected in binocular vision. The proposed technique is implemented by a software program that runs on a PC with 3D capabilities. The 3D technology is exploited to provide two different images to the two eyes. The measurement is performed by a classical random dot test, but differently to other tests printed on paper or plastic, the images shown to the patient can vary and the disparity between the two images can be set in order to exactly measure the stereoacuity. Moreover, thanks to the exploited 3D technology, the test does not present any monocular clue. These features allow delivering the test also in groups (instead of individuals) like school classes, and to reduce the risk of undetected amlyopia. The system can be easily operated also by not specialized personnel and this may further increase the cost efficiency of the test. We present the experiments carried on with a large set of children of age between five and seven years. We discuss the results and compare our technique with some traditional approaches.

Keywords

Stereopsis Randomdot test Amblyiopia 3D 

References

  1. 1.
    Achtman, R., Green, C., Bavelier, D.: Video games as a tool to train visual skills. Restorative Neurol. Neurosci. 26(4–5), 435–446 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aflaki, P., Hannuksela, M., Sarbolandi, H., Gabbouj, M.: Rendering stereoscopic video for simultaneous 2D and 3D presentation. In: 3DTV-Conference: The True Vision-Capture, Transmission and Dispaly of 3D Video (3DTV-CON), pp. 1–4, October 2013Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Breyer, A., Jiang, X., Rütsche, A., Mojon, D.S.: A new 3D monitor-based random-dot stereotest for children. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47(11), 4842 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang, C.-H., Tsai, R.-K., Sheu, M.-M.: Screening amblyopia of preschool children with uncorrected vision and stereopsis tests in eastern taiwan. Eye 21(12), 1482–1488 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chua, B.: Consequences of amblyopia on education, occupation, and long term vision loss. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 88(9), 1119–1121 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chyou, T., Clark, A., Meyer, J.: A 3D vision approach for correction of patient pose in radiotherapy. In: Engineering and Physical Sciences in Medicine and the Australian Biomedical Engineering Conference (EPSM ABEC 2011) (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Bougrenet, J.L., de la Tocnaye, B., Cochener, S., Ferragut, D., Iorgovan, Y.F., Lamard, M.: Supervised stereo visual acuity tests implemented on 3D TV monitors. J. Display Technol. 8(8), 472–478 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dixon-Woods, M., Awan, M., Gottlob, I.: Why is compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia so hard? a qualitative study. Arch. Dis. Child. 91(6), 491–494 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gadia, D., Garipoli, G., Bonanomi, C., Albani, L., Rizzi, A.: Assessing stereo blindness and stereo acuity on digital displays. Displays 35(4), 206–212 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gargantini, A., Bana, M., Fabiani, F.: Using 3D for rebalancing the visual system of amblyopic children. In: 2011 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR), pp. 1–7, June 2011Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gargantini, A., Facoetti, G., Vitali, A.: A random dot stereoacuity test based on 3D technology. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth 2014), Brussels, Belgium, pp. 358–361. Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering (ICST) (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hahn, E., Comstock, D., Connick, S., MacCarron, J., Mulla, S., Peters, P., LaRoche, R.: Monocular clues in seven stereoacuity tests. Dalhousie Med. J. 37(1), 4–13 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rahi, J.S., Logan, S., Timms, C., Russell-Eggitt, I., Taylor, D.: Risk, causes, and outcomes of visual impairment after loss of vision in the non-amblyopic eye: a population-based study. The Lancet 360(9333), 597–602 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stewart-Brown, S., Snowdon, S.: Evidence-based dilemmas in pre-school vision screening. Arch. Dis. Child. 78(5), 406–407 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vitali, A., Facoetti, G., Gargantini, A.: An environment for contrast-based treatment of amblyopia using 3D technology. In: International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation, Philadelphia. PA, USA, 26–29 August 2013. (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waddingham, P.E., Butler, T.K.H., Cobb, S.V., Moody, A.D.R., Comaish, I.F., Haworth, S.M., Gregson, R.M., Ash, I.M., Brown, S.M., Eastgate, R.M., Griffiths, G.D.: Preliminary results from the use of the novel interactive binocular treatment (I-BiT\(^{\rm TM}\)) system, in the treatment of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Eye 20(3), 375–378 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Webber, A.L., Wood, J.: Amblyopia: prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment. Clin. Exp. Optom. 88(6), 365–375 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Westheimer, G.: Three-dimensional displays and stereo vision. Proc. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278(1716), 2241–2248 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wright, K.: Handbook of Pediatric Strabismus and Amblyopia. Springer, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angelo Gargantini
    • 1
  • Giancarlo Facoetti
    • 1
  • Andrea Vitali
    • 1
  1. 1.Università degli Studi di BergamoBergamoItaly

Personalised recommendations