The Growing Spine pp 769-781 | Cite as
Growth Modulation Techniques: Titanium Clip-Screw Implant System (HemiBridge)
Abstract
Spinal growth modification using a thoracoscopically implanted clip-screw construct has been under investigation since 1997. Preclinical to clinical studies are described, including design objectives, theoretical advantages, mechanical function, clinical safety, surgical technique, and early radiographic and quality of life results. Most recently, a titanium construct and custom surgical instruments have been tested prospectively from first human use in a US FDA-approved clinical trial under an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) (IRB approved) for treatment of late juvenile and early adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Eligibility criteria were designed to include only those subjects at very high risk of curve progression to >50° by published criteria. The first six children who met the eligibility criteria assented, with parental consent. In the longest follow-up of the cohort to date, mean curvatures at 18 months had not increased from preoperative values. Individual longitudinal results were variable and included one subject who required instrumentation and fusion. Proof of concept in humans, however, was demonstrated in a child whose curvature was corrected by 71 % at 1 year. The corrected thoracic curve, coupled with a simultaneously developing compensatory lumbar curve, started to decrease coronal alignment. By 21 months, both lumbar curvature and coronal plane alignment improved. This time course suggests that the method may not only arrest thoracic curve progression, but may also alter the progression of compensatory curvatures. Implant design factors relative to anatomical dimensions and physiologic loading may be critical to consistent curve arrest. Longer-term results and a larger cohort are essential to determine the device performance. If successful, this minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical approach and clip-screw construct may become a standard of care for late juvenile and early adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The device is approved for use in the European Union (CE Mark) for the labeled indications. The pivotal-phase IDE clinical trial is approved by the US FDA.
Keywords
Idiopathic scoliosis Thoracic Spine growth modulation Hemiepiphysiodesis Guided growth Titanium clip-screw implant Staple Clinical trial FDA Investigational Device Exemption SpineForm’s HemiBridgeReferences
- 1.Arkin AM (1949) The mechanism of the structural changes in scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 31:519–528Google Scholar
- 2.Roaf R (1960) Vertebral growth and its mechanical control. J Bone Joint Surg Br 42-B:40–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Stokes IA, Spence H, Aronsson DD, Kilmer N (1996) Mechanical modulation of vertebral body growth: implications for scoliosis progression. Spine 21(10):1162–1167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Dwyer AF, Newton NC, Sherwood AA (1969) An anterior approach to scoliosis. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 62:192–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Smith AD, Von Lackum WH, Wylie R (1954) An operation for stapling vertebral bodies in congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 6-A:342–347Google Scholar
- 6.Nachlas IW, Borden JN (1951) The cure of experimental scoliosis by directed growth control. J Bone Joint Surg Am 33(A:1):24–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Wall EJ, Bylski-Austrow DI (2011) Growth modulation techniques for non-idiopathic early onset scoliosis. In: Yazici M (ed) Non-idiopathic spine deformities in young children. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bylski-Austrow DI, Wall EJ, Rupert MP, Roy DR, Crawford AH (2001) Growth plate forces in adolescent human knees: radiographic and mechanical study of epiphyseal staples. J Pediatr Orthop 21(6):817–823PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Bylski-Austrow DI, Crawford AH, Ballard ET (2003) Structure of the vertebral growth plate in scoliosis. Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, Amelia IslandGoogle Scholar
- 10.Wall EJ, Bylski-Austrow DI, Kolata RJ, Crawford AH (2005) Endoscopic mechanical spinal hemiepiphysiodesis modifies spine growth. Spine 30(10):1148–1153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Bylski-Austrow DI, Wall EJ, Glos DL, Ballard ET, Montgomery A, Crawford AH (2009) Spinal hemiepiphysiodesis decreases the size of vertebral growth plate hypertrophic zone and cells. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:584–593CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Stokes IA, Mente PL, Iatridis JC, Farnum CE, Aronsson DD (2002) Enlargement of growth plate chondrocytes modulated by sustained mechanical loading. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1842–1848PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Bylski-Austrow DI, Kumar B, Wall EJ (2013) Vertebral growth reductions after spinal hemiepiphysiodesis as determined by histomorphometry are lower than predicted by finite element model with linear stress-growth relationship. Orthopaedic Research Society, San Antonio, p 293Google Scholar
- 14.Glos DL, Boehm LA, Jain VV, Wall EJ, Bylski-Austrow DI (2010) Coronal plane displacement gradient precedes vertebral growth modification using titanium spinal hemiepiphyseal staples. International Congress on Early Onset Scoliosis & Growing Spine (ICEOS), Toronto, p 17Google Scholar
- 15.Glos DL, Sauser FE, Papautsky I, Bylski-Austrow DI (2010) Implantable MEMS compressive stress sensors: design, fabrication and calibration with application to the disc annulus. J Biomech 43:2244–2248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Bitter SM, Glos DL, Bylski-Austrow DI (2010) Compressive stiffness and bilateral intra-annular stresses after spinal hemiepiphysiodesis. Orthopaedic Research Society, New Orleans, p 1505Google Scholar
- 17.Bylski-Austrow DI, Glos DL, Sauser FE, Jain VV, Wall EF, Crawford AH (2012) In vivo dynamic compressive stresses in the disc annulus: a pilot study of bilateral differences due to hemiepiphyseal implant in quadruped model. Spine 37(16):E949–E956CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Coombs MT, Glos DL, Wall EJ, Kim J, Bylski-Austrow DI (2013) Biomechanics of spinal hemiepiphysiodesis for fusionless scoliosis treatment using titanium implant. Spine 38(23):E1454–E1460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Wall EJ, Grant R, Reynolds JE, Bylski-Austrow DI (2008) Spinal hemiepiphysiodesis by modified staple induces curvatures. International Congress on Early Onset Scoliosis & Growing Spine (ICEOS), MontrealGoogle Scholar
- 20.Clinicaltrials.gov [Internet1]. Identifier: NCT01465295: evaluate initial safety of the HemiBridgeTM System in guided spinal growth treatment of progressive idiopathic scoliosis. [updated 28 Aug 2013]. Available from: http://clinicltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01465295
- 21.Sanders JO, Khoury JG, Kishan S, Browne RH, Mooney JF 3rd, Arnold KD, McConnell SJ, Bauman JA, Finegold DN (2008) Predicting scoliosis progression from skeletal maturity: a simplified classification during adolescence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:540–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Katz DE, Herring JA, Browne RH, Kelly DM, Birch JG (2010) Brace wear control of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(6):1343–1352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Charles YP, Daures JP, de Rosa V, Diméglio A (2006) Progression risk of idiopathic juvenile scoliosis during pubertal growth. Spine 31(17):1933–1942CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Stokes IA, Aronsson DD, Dimock AN, Cortright V, Beck S (2006) Endochondral growth in growth plates of three species at two anatomical locations modulated by mechanical compression and tension. J Orthop Res 24(6):1327–1334PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar