SBR 2014 2014, ROBOCONTROL 2014, LARS 2014: Robotics pp 1-15 | Cite as

Searching for Regions Out of Normal Conditions Using a Team of Robots

  • David Saldaña
  • Luiz Chaimowicz
  • Mario F. M. Campos
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 507)

Abstract

Searching for regions in abnormal conditions is a priority in environments susceptible to catastrophes (e.g. forest fires or oil spills). Those disasters usually begin with an small anomaly that may became unsustainable if it is not detected at an early stage. We propose a probabilistic technique to coordinate multiple robots in perimeter searching and tracking, which are fundamental tasks if they are to detect and follow anomalies in an environment. The proposed method is based on a particle filter technique, which uses multiple robots to fuse distributed sensor information and estimate the shape of an anomaly. Complementary sensor fusion is used to coordinate robot navigation and reduce detection time when an anomaly arises. Validation of our approach is obtained both in simulation and with real robots. Five different scenarios were designed to evaluate and compare the efficiency in both exploration and tracking tasks. The results have demonstrated that when compared to state-of-the art methods in the literature, the proposed method is able to search anomalies under uncertainty and reduce the detection time by automatically increasing the number of robots.

Keywords

Multi-robot systems Robotic sensor networks Particle filter Perimeter detection Level-curve tracking 

References

  1. 1.
    Bachmayer, R., Leonard, N.: Vehicle networks for gradient descent in a sampled environment. In: Procedings of 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, December 2002Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertozzi, A., Kemp, M.: Determining environmental boundaries: asynchronous communication and physical scales. In: Proceedings of the Block Island Workshop Cooperative Control (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bertozzi, A.L.: Environmental boundary tracking and estimation using multiple autonomous vehicles. In: 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4918–4923 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruemmer, D.: A robotic swarm for spill finding and perimeter formation. In: Spectrum: International Conference on Nuclear and Hazardous Waste Management (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark, J., Fierro, R.: Cooperative hybrid control of robotic sensors for perimeter detection and tracking. In: Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, pp. 3500–3505 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark, J., Fierro, R.: Mobile robotic sensors for perimeter detection and tracking. ISA Trans. 46(1), 3–13 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fiorelli, E., Bhatta, P., Leonard, N.E.: Adaptive sampling using feedback control of an autonomous underwater glider fleet. In: Aerospace Engineering, August 2003Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fiorelli, E., Leonard, N.E.: Exploring scalar fields using multiple sensor platforms: tracking level curves. In: 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3579–3584 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hol, J.D., Schon, T.B., Gustafsson, F.: On resampling algorithms for particle filters. In: 2006 IEEE Nonlinear Statistical Signal Processing Workshop, pp. 79–82. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hsieh, C., Marthaler, D., Nguyen, B., Tung, D., Bertozzi, A.L., Murray, R.: Experimental validation of an algorithm for cooperative boundary tracking. In: Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, pp. 1078–1083 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joshi, A., Ashley, T., Huang, Y.R., Bertozzi, A.L.: Experimental validation of cooperative environmental boundary tracking with on-board sensors. In: Control, pp. 2630–2635 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kemp, M., Bertozzi, A., Marthaler, D.: Multi-UUV perimeter surveillance. In: IEEE OES Workshop on Multiple AUV Operations (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, S., Guo, Y., Bingham, B.: Multi-robot cooperative control for monitoring and tracking dynamic plumes. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Proceedings, ICRA 2014. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marthaler, D., Bertozzi, A.: Collective motion algorithms for determining environmental boundaries. In: SIAM Conference on Applications of Dynamical Systems (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marthaler, D., Bertozzi, A.: Tracking environmental level sets with autonomous vehicles. J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 2865 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mottaghi, R., Vaughan, R.: An integrated particle filter and potential field method for cooperative robot target tracking. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2006. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ogren, P., Fiorelli, E., Leonard, N.: Cooperative control of mobile sensor networks: adaptive gradient climbing in a distributed environment. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49(8), 1292–1302 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ogren, P., Fiorelli, E., Leonard, N.E.: Formations with a mission: stable coordination of vehicle group maneuvers. In: Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quigley, M., Conley, K., Gerkey, B., Faust, J., Foote, T., Leibs, J., Wheeler, R., Ng, A.Y.: ROS: an open-source robot operating system. In: ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saldana, D., Ovalle, D., Montoya, A.: Improved algorithm for perimeter tracking in robotic sensor networks. In: XXXVIII Latin American Conference on Informatics (CLEI), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sibley, G., Rahimi, M., Sukhatme, G.: Robomote: a tiny mobile robot platform for large-scale ad-hoc sensor networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Proceedings, ICRA 2002, vol. 2, pp. 1143–1148. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thrun, S.: Probabilistic robotics. Commun. ACM 45(3), 52–57 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Saldaña
    • 1
  • Luiz Chaimowicz
    • 1
  • Mario F. M. Campos
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Vision and Robotics Laboratory (VeRLab), Computer Science DepartmentUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations