Log-Concavity and Lower Bounds for Arithmetic Circuits

  • Ignacio García-Marco
  • Pascal Koiran
  • Sébastien Tavenas
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9235)

Abstract

One question that we investigate in this paper is, how can we build log-concave polynomials using sparse polynomials as building blocks? More precisely, let \(f = \sum _{i = 0}^d a_i X^i \in \mathbb {R}^+[X]\) be a polynomial satisfying the log-concavity condition \(a_i^2 > \tau a_{i-1}a_{i+1}\) for every \(i \in \{1,\ldots ,d-1\},\) where \(\tau > 0\). Whenever f can be written under the form \(f = \sum _{i = 1}^k \prod _{j = 1}^m f_{i,j}\) where the polynomials \(f_{i,j}\) have at most t monomials, it is clear that \(d \leqslant k t^m\). Assuming that the \(f_{i,j}\) have only non-negative coefficients, we improve this degree bound to \(d = \mathcal O(k m^{2/3} t^{2m/3} \mathrm{log^{2/3}}(kt))\) if \(\tau > 1\), and to \(d \leqslant kmt\) if \(\tau = d^{2d}\).

This investigation has a complexity-theoretic motivation: we show that a suitable strengthening of the above results would imply a separation of the algebraic complexity classes \(\mathsf {VP}\) and \(\mathsf {VNP}\). As they currently stand, these results are strong enough to provide a new example of a family of polynomials in \(\mathsf {VNP}\) which cannot be computed by monotone arithmetic circuits of polynomial size.

Keywords

Newton Polygon Arithmetic Circuit Polynomial Size Input Gate Bivariate Polynomial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal, M., Vinay, V.: Arithmetic circuits: a chasm at depth four. In: 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2008, October 25–28, 2008, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 67–75 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bürgisser, P.: Completeness and Reduction in Algebraic Complexity Theory. Algorithms and Computation in Mathematics. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eisenbrand, F., Pach, J., Rothvoß, T., Sopher, N.B.: Convexly independent subsets of the Minkowski sum of planar point sets. Electron. J. Combin., 15(1): Note 8, 4 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J.E., Pólya, G.: Inequalities. Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988). Reprint of the 1952 editionMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hrubes, P.: A note on the real \(\tau \)-conjecture and the distribution of complex roots. Theo. Comput. 9(10), 403–411 (2013). http://eccc.hpi-web.de/report/2012/121/ MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hutchinson, J.I.: On a remarkable class of entire functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 25(3), 325–332 (1923)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jerrum, M., Snir, M.: Some exact complexity results for straight-line computations over semirings. J. ACM (JACM) 29(3), 874–897 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karavelas, M.I., Tzanaki, E.: The maximum number of faces of the Minkowski sum of two convex polytopes. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 11–28 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koiran, P.: Valiant’s model and the cost of computing integers. Comput. Complex. 13, 131–146 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koiran, P.: Shallow circuits with high-powered inputs. In: Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Innovations in Computer Science (ICS 2011) (2011). http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.4960
  11. 11.
    Koiran, P.: Arithmetic circuits: the chasm at depth four gets wider. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 448, 56–65 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koiran, P., Portier, N., Tavenas, S., Thomassé, S.: A \(\tau \)-conjecture for Newton polygons. Found. Comput. Math. 15(1), 185–197 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kurtz, D.C.: A sufficient condition for all the roots of a polynomial to be real. Amer. Math. Monthly 99(3), 259–263 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tavenas, S.: Improved bounds for reduction to depth 4 and depth 3. In: Chatterjee, K., Sgall, J. (eds.) MFCS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8087, pp. 813–824. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Valiant, L.G.: Completeness classes in algebra. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 1979, pp. 249–261. ACM, New York, NY, USA (1979)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Valiant, L.G.: Negation can be exponentially powerful. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 189–196. ACM (1979). Journal version in Theo. Comput. Sci. 12(3), 303–314 (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ignacio García-Marco
    • 1
  • Pascal Koiran
    • 1
  • Sébastien Tavenas
    • 2
  1. 1.LIP, ENSLyonFrance
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Insitut Für InformatikSaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations