Advertisement

3D Virtual Treatment Planning of Orthognathic Surgery

  • Gwen R. J. SwennenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Treatment planning of orthognathic and orthofacial surgery needs to be based on the individual natural head position (NHP) of the patient, which is independent of intracranial reference planes and determined by the clinician.

Keywords

Orthognathic Surgery Incisal Position Gonial Angle Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Facial Midline 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Video 3.1

(MP4 26121 kb)

Video 3.2

(MP4 46875 kb)

Video 3.3

(MP4 31709 kb)

Video 3.4

(MP4 103427 kb)

Video 3.5

(MP4 103427 kb)

Additional Recommended Reading

  1. Aboul-Hosn Centenero S, Hernández-Alfaro F (2012) 3D planning in orthognathic surgery: CAD/CAM surgical splints and prediction of the soft and hard tissues results - our experience in 16 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40:162–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman JL, Proffit WR, Sarver DM, Ackerman MB, Kean MR (2007) Pitch, roll, and yaw: describing the spatial orientation of dentofacial traits. Am J Orthod Dentofac 131:305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnett GW, McLaughlin RP (2004) Facial and dental planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. Mosby, Elsevier Limited. Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnett GW, Gunson MJ (2004) Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. Am J Orthod Dentofac 126:290–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjerin R (1957) A comparison between the Frankfort horizontal and the Sella turcica-nasion as reference planes in cephalometric analysis. Acta Odontologica Scandinavia 15:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bobek S, Farrell B, Choi C, Farrell B, Weimer K, Tucker M (2015) Virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery using digital data transfer and an intraoral fiducial marker: the charlotte method. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 73:1143–1158Google Scholar
  7. Cevidanes L, Oliveira AEF, Motta A, Phillips C, Burke B, Tyndall D (2009) Head orientation in CBCT-generated cephalograms. Angle Orthod 79:971–977CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooke MS (1990) Five-year reproducibility of natural head posture: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod 97:489–494Google Scholar
  9. Cooke MS, Wei SH (1988) The reproducibility of natural head posture: a methodological study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 93:280–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Ren Y (2010) Simple technique to achieve a natural position of the head for cone beam computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:236–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. De Paula LK, Ackerman JL, Carvalho FdeAR, Eidson L, Cevidanes LHS (2012) Digital live-tracking 3-dimensional minisensors for recording head orientation during image acquisition. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141:116–123Google Scholar
  12. Downs WB (1956) Analysis of the dento-facial profile. Angle Orthod 4:191–212Google Scholar
  13. Farrell BB, Franco PB, Tucker MR (2014) Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 26:459–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF (2011) New methods to evaluate craniofacial deformity and to plan surgical correction. Semin Orthod 17:225–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Lundström A, Lundström F, Lebret LM, Moorrees CF (1995) Natural head position and natural head orientation: basic considerations in cephalometric analysis and research. Eur J Orthod 17:111–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lundström F, Lundström A (1992) Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:244–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marchetti C, Bianchi A, Bassi M, Gori R, Lamberti C, Sarti A (2007) Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation in maxillo-facial virtual surgery (VISU). J Craniofac Surg 18:826–832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Marchetti C, Bianchi A, Muyldermans L, Di Martino M, Lancellotti L, Sarti A (2011) Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:26–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mollemans W, Schutyser F, Nadjmi N, Maes F, Suetens P (2007) Predicting soft tissue deformations for a maxillofacial surgery planning system: from computational strategies to a complete clinical validation. Med Image Anal 11:282–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Moorrees CFA, Kean MR (1958) Natural head position, a basic consideration in the interpretation of cephalometric radiographs. Am J Phys Anthropol 16:213–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nadjmi N, Defrancq E, Mollemans W, Hemelen GV, Bergé S (2014) Quantitative validation of a computer-aided maxillofacial planning system, focusing on soft tissue deformations. Ann Maxillofac Surg 4:171–175CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Nadjmi N, Mollemans W, Daelemans A, Van Hemelen G, Schutyser F, Bergé S (2010) Virtual occlusion in planning orthognathic surgical procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:457–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Peng L, Cooke MS (1999) Fifteen-year reproducibility of natural head posture: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 116:82–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Quevedo LA, Ruiz JV, Quevedo CA (2011) Using a clinical protocol for orthognathic surgery and assessing a 3-dimensional virtual approach: current therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:623–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Solow B, Tallgren A (1971) Natural head position in standing subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 29:591–607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F (2007) Three-dimensional virtual approach to diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillo-facial deformity. In: Bell WH, Guerrero CA, eds. Distraction osteogenesis of the facial skeleton. BC Decker Inc., Hamilton; 2007. p 6Google Scholar
  27. Swennen GRJ, Mommaerts MY, Abeloos J, De Clercq C, Lamoral P, Neyt N, Casselman J, Schutyser F (2009a) A cone-beam CT based technique to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:48–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Swennen GRJ, Mollemans W, Schutyser F (2009b) Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2080–2092CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Swennen GRJ (2014) Timing of three-dimensional virtual treatment planning of orthognathic surgery: a prospective single-surgeon evaluation on 350 consecutive cases. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 26:475–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF (2009) New clinical protocol to evaluate craniomaxillofacial deformity and plan surgical correction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2093–2106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Xia JJ, McGrory JK, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Dawson BC, Kennedy KA, Lasky RE, English JD, Kau CH, McGrory KR (2011) A new method to orient 3-dimensional computed tomography models to the natural head position: a clinical feasibility study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:584–591CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of SurgeryGeneral Hospital St-Jan Bruges-OstendBrugesBelgium
  2. 2.Bruges Cleft and Craniofacial CentreBrugesBelgium
  3. 3.Private Practice in Facial Cosmetic SurgeryClinic TilleghemBrugesBelgium
  4. 4.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
  5. 5.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversity of CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations