Domain-Specific OWL Ontology Visualization with OWLGrEd

  • Karlis Cerans
  • Renars Liepins
  • Arturs Sprogis
  • Julija Ovcinnikova
  • Guntis Barzdins
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7540)

Abstract

The OWLGrEd ontology editor allows graphical visualization and authoring of OWL 2.0 ontologies using a compact yet intuitive presentation that combines UML class diagram notation with textual Manchester syntax for expressions. We present an extension mechanism for OWLGrEd that allows adding custom information areas, rules and visual effects to the ontology presentation thus enabling domain specific OWL ontology visualizations. The usage of OWLGrEd and its extensions is demonstrated on ontology engineering examples involving custom annotation visualizations, advanced UML class dia-gram constructs and integrity constraints in semantic database schema design.

Keywords

OWL UML/OWL profile OWLGrEd Domain-specific ontology visualization Semantic databases Integrity constraints 

References

  1. 1.
    Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuiness, D.: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Parsia, B.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brockmans, S., Volz, R., Eberhart, A., Löffler, P.: Visual modeling of OWL DL ontologies using UML. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 198–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ODM UML profile for OWL. http://www.omg.org/spec/ODM/1.0/PDF/
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Barzdins, J., Barzdins, G., Cerans, K., Liepins, R., Sprogis, A.: OWLGrEd: a UML style graphical notation and editor for OWL 2. In: Proceedings of OWLED 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barzdiņš, J., Barzdiņš, G., Čerans, K., Liepiņš, R., Sprogis, A.: UML style graphical notation and editor for OWL 2. In: Forbrig, P., Günther, H. (eds.) BIR 2010. LNBIP, vol. 64, pp. 102–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Unified Modeling Language: Infrastructure, version 2.1. OMG Specification ptc/06-04-03. http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/06-04-03.pdf
  11. 11.
    Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure, version 2.1. OMG Specification ptc/06-04-02. http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/06-04-02.pdf
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Barzdins, J., Cerans, K., Liepins, R., Sprogis, A.: Advanced ontology visualization with OWLGrEd. In: Proceedings of OWLED 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Tao, J., Sirin, E., Bao, J., McGuinness, D.: Integrity constraints in OWL. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sirin, E., Smith, M., Vallace, E: Opening, closing worlds – on integrity constraints. In: Proceedings of OWLED 2008 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karlis Cerans
    • 1
  • Renars Liepins
    • 1
  • Arturs Sprogis
    • 1
  • Julija Ovcinnikova
    • 1
  • Guntis Barzdins
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of LatviaRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations