Multi-GNSS PPP and PPP-RTK: Some GPS+BDS Results in Australia

  • Dennis Odijk
  • Baocheng Zhang
  • Peter J. G. Teunissen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 341)

Abstract

As in the Asian-Pacific region BDS is operational next to GPS, satellite clocks (needed for Precise Point Positioning; PPP) and satellite phase hardware biases (needed for integer ambiguity resolution enabled PPP-RTK) have been estimated from a zero baseline in Perth, Australia, and applied to dual-frequency GPS+BDS data of a single GNSS receiver at a distance of 110 km from the zero baseline. Precise orbits were obtained from the IGS (GPS) and Wuhan University (BDS). It is shown that with GPS alone the PPP solution needs on average 1 h to converge to a level of a few decimetres, whereas with BDS alone this takes on average 2.5 h, which is due to the poorer geometry of the BDS satellites in Australia. With both GPS and BDS combined this convergence time is tremendously reduced to 30 min on average. With the satellite phase biases corrected, the precision of the GPS+BDS PPP-RTK solution is at the few centimetre level.

Keywords

GNSS GPS BDS PPP PPP-RTK Ambiguity resolution 

References

  1. 1.
    Odijk D, Teunissen PJG, Zhang B (2012) Single-frequency integer ambiguity resolution enabled GPS precise point positioning. J Surv Eng 138:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shi C, Zhao Q, Li M, Tang W, Hu Z, Lou Y, Zhang H, Niu X, Liu J (2012) Precise orbit determination of BeiDou satellites with precise positioning. Sci China Earth Sci 55(7):1079–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li M, Qu L, Zhao Q, Guo J, Su X, Li X (2014) Precise point positioning with the BeiDou navigation satellite system. Sensors 14:927–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tegedor J, Ovstedal O, Vigen E (2014) Precise orbit determination and point positioning using GPS, Glonass, Galileo and BeiDou. J Geodetic Sci 4:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Odolinski R, Teunissen PJG, Odijk D (2015) Combined GPS+BDS for short to long baseline RTK positioning. Published in the mean time. Measurement Science and Technology. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/26/4/045801
  6. 6.
    Wang M, Cai H, Pan Z (2015) BDS/GPS relative positioning for long baseline with undifferenced observations. Adv Space Res 55:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems. J Geodesy 83:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao Q, Guo J, Li M, Qu L, Hu Z, Shi C, Liu J (2013) Initial results of precise orbit and clock determination for COMPASS navigation satellite system. J Geodesy 87(5):475–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer estimation. J Geodesy 70:65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nadarajah N, Teunissen PJG, Sleewaegen JM, Montenbruck O (2014) The mixed-receiver BeiDou inter-satellite-type bias and its impact on RTK positioning. GPS Solutions. doi:10.1007/s10291-014-0392-6
  11. 11.
    Wang G, de Jong K, Zhao Q, Hu Z, Guo J (2015) Multipath analysis of code measurements for BeiDou geostationary satellites. GPS Solutions 19:129–139Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verhagen S, Teunissen PJG (2013) The ratio test for future GNSS ambiguity resolution. GPS Solutions 17:535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Odijk
    • 1
  • Baocheng Zhang
    • 1
  • Peter J. G. Teunissen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.GNSS Research CentreCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Geosciences and Remote SensingDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations