Shared Message Boards for Smart Enterprises

  • Kelly Shigeno
  • Carlos Cardonha
  • Nicole Sultanum
  • Rodrigo L. Guimarães
  • Mateus Molinaro
  • Ricardo Herrmann
  • Sergio Borger
  • Fernando Koch
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 498)

Abstract

Shared Message Boards foster communication practices within restricted groups that typically do not emerge in traditional social networks. In this article, we describe an experiment in which a Shared Message Board technology was employed to support carpooling activities in a large company in Brazil. Based on the results extracted from the platform and from two user studies, we identified important elements influencing the adoption of this technology as well as other activities where it can be effectively used in order to promote the development of smart enterprises.

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., Passonneau, R.: Sentiment Analysis of Twitter data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media, LSM 2011, pp. 30–38. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aggarwal, C.: Social Network Data Analytics, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Archambault, A., Grudin, J.: A longitudinal study of Facebook, Linkedin, & Twitter use. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2012, pp. 2741–2750. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Battestini, A., Setlur, V., Sohn, T.: A large scale study of text-messaging use. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI 2010, pp. 229–238. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauer, M., Gaskell, G.: Qualitative researching with text, image and sound. SAGE Publications (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bentley, F., Barret, E.: Building Mobile Experiences. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bermingham, A., Smeaton, A.F.: Classifying sentiment in microblogs: Is brevity an advantage? In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2010, pp. 1833–1836. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blei, D.M.: Introduction to probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brignall, H., Rogers, Y.: Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In: Proceedings of INTERACT 2003, pp. 17–24 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Church, K., de Oliveira, R.: What’s up with WhatsApp?: Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional sms. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI 2013, pp. 352–361. ACM, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Harshman, R.: Indexing by latent semantic analysis 41, 391–407Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greenberg, S., Rounding, M.: The notification collage: Posting information to public and personal displays. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 514–521. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johri, A.: Look ma, no email!: Blogs and IRC as primary and preferred communication tools in a distributed firm. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW 2011, pp. 305–308. ACM, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Le Dantec, C.: Participation and publics: Supporting community engagement. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2012, pp. 1351–1360 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lucero, A., Holopainen, J., Jokela, T.: MobiComics: Collaborative use of mobile phones and large displays for public expression. ACM Press (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martin, B., Hannington, B.: Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Rockport Publishers (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Molinaro, M., Borger, S., Cardonha, C., Gallo, D., Herrmann, R., Ferreira, A., Koch, F., Avegliano, P., Shigeno, K.: Smarter board: A community-oriented communication tool. In: Proc. of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, W4A 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turner, T., Qvarfordt, P., Biehl, J.T., Golovchinsky, G., Back, M.: Exploring the workplace communication ecology. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010, pp. 841–850. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vyas, D., Van De Watering, M.R., Eliëns, A., van der Veer, G.C.: Being social@ work: Designing for playfully mediated social awareness in work environments. In: Venkatesh, A., Gonsalves, T., Monk, A., Buckner, K. (eds.) Home Informatics and Telematics: ICT for the Next Billion. IFIP, vol. 241, pp. 113–131. Springer, Boston (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu, A., Biehl, J., Rieffel, E., Turner, T., van Melle, W.: Learning how to feel again: Towards affective workplace presence and communication technologies. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2012, pp. 839–848. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly Shigeno
    • 1
    • 3
  • Carlos Cardonha
    • 3
  • Nicole Sultanum
    • 3
  • Rodrigo L. Guimarães
    • 3
  • Mateus Molinaro
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ricardo Herrmann
    • 3
  • Sergio Borger
    • 3
  • Fernando Koch
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo - USPBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de Pesquisas TecnologicasBrazil
  3. 3.IBM ResearchBrazil
  4. 4.SAMSUNG Research InstituteBrazil

Personalised recommendations