Advertisement

Finding Highly Connected Subgraphs

  • Falk Hüffner
  • Christian Komusiewicz
  • Manuel Sorge
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8939)

Abstract

A popular way of formalizing clusters in networks are highly connected subgraphs, that is, subgraphs of k vertices that have edge connectivity larger than k/2 (equivalently, minimum degree larger than k/2). We examine the computational complexity of finding highly connected subgraphs. We first observe that this problem is NP-hard. Thus, we explore possible parameterizations, such as the solution size, number of vertices in the input, the size of a vertex cover in the input, and the number of edges outgoing from the solution (edge isolation), and expose their influence on the complexity of this problem. For some parameters, we find strong intractability results; among the parameters yielding tractability, the edge isolation seems to provide the best trade-off between running time bounds and a small parameter value in relevant instances.

Keywords

Vertex Cover Reduction Rule Edge Deletion Problem Kernel Search Tree Node 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Binkele-Raible, D., Fernau, H., Fomin, F.V., Lokshtanov, D., Saurabh, S., Villanger, Y.: Kernel(s) for problems with no kernel: On out-trees with many leaves. ACM Trans. Algorithms 8(4), 38 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bodlaender, H.L., Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R., Hermelin, D.: On problems without polynomial kernels. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 75(8), 423–434 (2009)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chartrand, G.: A graph-theoretic approach to a communications problem. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 14(4), 778–781 (1966)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, J., Kanj, I.A., Xia, G.: Improved upper bounds for vertex cover. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411, 40–42 (2010)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R.: Fundamentals of Parameterized Complexity. Texts in Computer Science. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eppstein, D., Löffler, M., Strash, D.: Listing all maximal cliques in sparse graphs in near-optimal time. In: Cheong, O., Chwa, K.-Y., Park, K. (eds.) ISAAC 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6506, pp. 403–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fellows, M.R., Jansen, B.M.P., Rosamond, F.A.: Towards fully multivariate algorithmics: Parameter ecology and the deconstruction of computational complexity. Eur. J. Combinatorics 34(3), 541–566 (2013)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fomin, F.V., Kratsch, S., Pilipczuk, M., Pilipczuk, M., Villanger, Y.: Tight bounds for parameterized complexity of cluster editing with a small number of clusters. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 80(7), 1430–1447 (2014)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hartuv, E., Shamir, R.: A clustering algorithm based on graph connectivity. Inf. Process. Lett. 76(4–6), 175–181Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hua, Q.-S., Wang, Y., Yu, D., Lau, F.C.M.: Dynamic programming based algorithms for set multicover and multiset multicover problems. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(26-28), 2467–2474 (2010)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hüffner, F., Komusiewicz, C., Liebtrau, A., Niedermeier, R.: Partitioning biological networks into highly connected clusters with maximum edge coverage. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. 11(3), 455–467 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ito, H., Iwama, K.: Enumeration of isolated cliques and pseudo-cliques. ACM Trans. Algorithms 5(4), Article 40 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ito, H., Iwama, K., Osumi, T.: Linear-time enumeration of isolated cliques. In: Brodal, G.S., Leonardi, S. (eds.) ESA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3669, pp. 119–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Komusiewicz, C., Hüffner, F., Moser, H., Niedermeier, R.: Isolation concepts for efficiently enumerating dense subgraphs. Theor. Comput. Sci 410(38-40), 3640–3654 (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, G., Wong, L.: Effective pruning techniques for mining quasi-cliques. In: Daelemans, W., Goethals, B., Morik, K. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2008, Part II. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5212, pp. 33–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lokshtanov, D., Marx, D., Saurabh, S.: Lower bounds based on the Exponential Time Hypothesis. Bulletin of the EATCS 105, 41–71 (2011)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matsuda, H., Ishihara, T., Hashimoto, A.: Classifying molecular sequences using a linkage graph with their pairwise similarities. Theor. Comput. Sci. 210(2), 305–325 (1999)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pattillo, J., Youssef, N., Butenko, S.: On clique relaxation models in network analysis. Eur. J. Operational Research 226(1), 9–18 (2013)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sharan, R., Ulitsky, I., Shamir, R.: Network-based prediction of protein function. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 88 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Veremyev, A., Prokopyev, O.A., Boginski, V., Pasiliao, E.L.: Finding maximum subgraphs with relatively large vertex connectivity. Eur. J. Operational Research 239(2), 349–362 (2014)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Falk Hüffner
    • 1
  • Christian Komusiewicz
    • 1
  • Manuel Sorge
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Softwaretechnik und Theoretische InformatikTU BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations