Implementable Ethics for Autonomous Vehicles

  • J. Christian Gerdes
  • Sarah M. Thornton

Zusammenfassung

As agents moving through an environment that includes a range of other road users – from pedestrians and cyclists to other human or automated drivers – automated vehicles continuously interact with the humans around them. The nature of these interactions is a result of the programming in the vehicle and the priorities placed there by the programmers. Just as human drivers display a range of driving styles and preferences, automated vehicles represent a broad canvas on which the designers can craft the response to different driving scenarios.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Floridi, L., Sanders, J.W.: On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines 14 (3), 349–379 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin, P., Bekey, G., Abney, K.: Autonomous military robotics: risk, ethics, and design. Report funded by the US Office of Naval Research. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. http://ethics.calpoly.edu/ONR_report.pdf (2008). Accessed 8 July 2014
  3. 3.
    Goodall, N. J.: Machine ethics and automated vehicles. In: Meyer, G. and Beiker, S. (eds.) Road Vehicle Automation. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wallach, W., Allen, C.: Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right From Wrong. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boltyanskii, V. G., Gamkrelidze, R. V., Pontryagin, L.S.: On the theory of optimal processes, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSR 110 (1), 7–10 (1956). In RussianGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mattingley, J., Wang, Y., Boyd, S.: Code generation for receding horizon control. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design (CACSD), 985–992 (2010) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gibson, J. J., Crooks, L. E.: A theoretical field-analysis of automobile driving. American Journal of Psychology 51, 453–471 (1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reichardt, D., Schick, J.: Collision avoidance in dynamic environments applied to autonomous vehicle guidance on the motorway. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Vehicles (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerdes, J. C., Rossetter, E. J.: A unified approach to driver assistance systems based on artificial potential fields. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 123 (3), 431–438 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schiller, B., Morellas, V., Donath, M.: Collision avoidance for highway vehicles using the virtual bumper controller. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Vehicles (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsumi, R., Raksincharoensak, P., Nagai, M.: Predictive pedestrian collision avoidance with driving intelligence model based on risk potential estimation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control, AVEC ’14 (2014) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin, P.: Ethics and autonomous cars: why ethics matters, and how to think about it. Lecture presented at Daimler and Benz Foundation Villa Ladenburg Project Expert Workshop, Monterey, California, 21 February 2014Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pascal, B.: Pensées (1670). Translated by W. F. Trotter, Dent, London (1910)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Edmonds, D.: Would You Kill the Fat Man? The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us About Right and Wrong. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maciejowski, J. M.: Predictive Control with Constraints. Prentice Hall (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Asimov, I.: I, Robot. Dobson, London (1950)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kritayakirana, K., Gerdes, J. C.: Autonomous vehicle control at the limits of handling. International Journal of Vehicle Autonomous Systems 10 (4), 271–296, (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Funke, J., Theodosis, P., Hindiyeh, R., Stanek, G., Kritatakirana, K., Gerdes, J. C., Langer, D., Hernandez, M., Muller-Bessler, B., Huhnke, B.: Up to the limits: autonomous Audi TTS. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Vehicles (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guizzo, E.: How Google's self-driving car works. IEEE Spectrum Automaton blog. October 18, 2011. Retrieved November 10, 201–4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ingrassia, P.: Look, no hands! Test driving a Google car. Reuters. Aug 17, 201–4Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Erlien, S. M., Fujita, S., Gerdes, J. C.: Safe driving envelopes for shared control of ground vehicles. In Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Automotive Control, Tokyo, Japan (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Erlien, S., Funke, J., Gerdes, J. C.: Incorporating nonlinear tire dynamics into a convex approach to shared steering control. In Proceedings of the 2014 American Control Conference, Portland, OR (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editors and the Authors 2015

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Christian Gerdes
    • 1
  • Sarah M. Thornton
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Automotive Research at StanfordStanford UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Mechanical EngineeringStanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations