Advertisement

The Effect on School Operations of the Use of School Management Software in Victoria

  • Christopher Tatnall
  • Arthur Tatnall
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 444)

Abstract

In this paper we will discuss the effects on schools in Victoria, Australia of use of the various school management systems provided by the Education Department, and the difference the use of this software has made to school operations. To better appreciate this, using a case study methodology, we will look at the use of these systems in a primary school in metropolitan Melbourne. The Victorian Education Department provides a raft of software for various administrative tasks in its schools and these are described in the paper. The goal of the paper, however, is to analyse the difference these management systems have made to the operation of the case study school and other schools in Victoria, compared with pre-computer manual systems.

Keywords

Educational management systems schools Victoria applications 

References

  1. 1.
    Tatnall, A.: The Growth of Educational Computing in Australia. In: Goodson, I.F., Mangan, J.M. (eds.) History, Context, and Qualitative Methods in the Study of Education, pp. 207–248. University of Western Ontario, London (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tatnall, A., Davey, B.: Reflections on the History of Computer Education in Schools in Victoria. In: Tatnall, A. (ed.) Reflections on the History of Computing. IFIP AICT, vol. 387, pp. 243–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Department of Education and Early Childhood Development: Statistics for Victorian Schools (2014), http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/department/Pages/factsandfigures.aspx (retrieved August 25, 2014)
  4. 4.
    Tatnall, C., Tatnall, A.: Using Educational Management Systems to Enhance Teaching and Learning in the Classroom: an Investigative Study. In: Tatnall, A., Okamoto, T., Visscher, A.J. (eds.) Knowledge Management for Educational Innovation. IFIP, vol. 230, pp. 75–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development. Management Information Systems Quarterly 17(3), 1–28 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alavi, M., Carlson, P.: Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development. Journal of Management Information Systems 8(4), 45–62 (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Merriam, S.B.: Case study research in education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stake, R.E.: Case Study Methods in Educational Research: Seeking Sweet Water. In: Jaeger, R.M. (ed.) Complementary Methods for Research in Education, pp. 253–265. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hurstbridge Primary School: Hurstbridge Primary School: Imagine, Believe, Achieve (2014), http://www.hbridgeps.vic.edu.au/ (retrieved August 25, 2014)
  11. 11.
    Birse, J.: Victorian Administrative Computing Unit, Melbourne, Australia. Taped interview (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tatnall, A.: Information Technology and the Management of Victorian Schools - Providing Flexibility or Enabling Better Central Control? In: Barta, B.Z., Telem, M., Gev, Y. (eds.) Information Technology in Educational Management, pp. 99–108. Chapman & Hall, London (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schools’ Administrative Systems Development Unit: Computer Aided Administrative System - STAGE 1 - Staff and Students (Version 1.3). Ministry of Education Victoria, Melbourne, Australia (1987) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Directorate of School Education: Computerised Administrative Systems Environment in Schools - MS-DOS desktop computer hardware specifications. Victorian Government, Melbourne, Australia (1993)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Department of Education and Early Childhood Development: CASES21 (2012), http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/ictsupportservices/cases21/functionality.htm (retrieved August 25, 2014)
  16. 16.
    Department of Education and Early Childhood Development: School Maintenance System (2013), http://prms21.eduweb.vic.gov.au/home/ (retrieved August 25, 2014)
  17. 17.
    Department of Education and Early Childhood Development: Human Resources: EduPay (2013), http://www.education.vic.gov.au/hrweb/pages/resources/edupay.aspx (retrieved August 25, 2014)
  18. 18.
    Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority: NAPLAN (2011), http://www.nap.edu.au/ (retrieved August 25, 2014)
  19. 19.
    DEECD: Ultranet (2011), http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/directions/ultranet/default.htm (retrieved August 25, 2014)
  20. 20.
    Tatnall, A., et al.: The Ultranet: an eGovernment Project Management Failure? In: Wigand, D.L., et al. (eds.) 26th Bled eConference, eInnovations: Challenges and Impacts for Individuals, pp. 32–47. Organizations and Society, Bled (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    State Computer Education Centre: Some thoughts on computers in School Administration. Ministry of Education, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (1985)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schools Administrative Computing Unit: Recommended Computing Systems for Administration in Schools. Ministry of Education, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Tatnall
    • 1
  • Arthur Tatnall
    • 2
  1. 1.Hurstbridge Primary SchoolMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Victoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations