Creating Knowledge Sharing Culture via Social Network Sites at School: A Research Intended for Teachers

  • Cevat Celep
  • Tuğba Konaklı
  • Nur Kuyumcu
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 444)


Social networks, like forums, friendship sites, music sharing sites etc., are gaining importance in a quickly changing world. They are also becoming a current issue on the agenda of an ‘education’ sector who wants to be harmonized with the changing world. Social networks which students admire make educators think about how a speedy, pervious and structured Internet could be used in an educational concept besides its entertaining aspect. Activating these features of social networks may clear away the obstacles of a knowledge sharing culture which originated from existing organization concerned with the individual and technology in educational organizations. This research aims at investigating which functions of Internet are preferred by educators and recommends what can be done to develop a knowledge sharing culture via social networks at school. Data have been gathered from 13 teachers via semi-structured and open-ended questions. The instrument used in this study was the interview. The data were coded and transformed into categories. The results showed that teachers mostly use the social networks Facebook, YouTube and Google+.


Social networks knowledge sharing culture teachers content analysis 


  1. 1.
    Marshall, G.: Sociology Dictionary. Science and Art Press, Ankara (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hargreaves, A.: Sustainability of educational change: The role of social geographies. Journal of Educational Change 3(3-4), 189–214 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyd, D.M., Ellison, N.B.: Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 1(1), 210–230 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kwon, O., Wen, Y.: An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers in Human Behavior 26(2), 254–263 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Reilly, T.: What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies 65, 17–39 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biçen, H., Çavuş, N.: The most preferred social network sites by students. Paper presented at World Conference on Educational Sciences (WCES), İstanbul, Turkey (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellison, N.B.: Introduction: Reshaping campus communication and community through social network sites. In: Salaway, G., Caruso, J.B., Nelson, M.R. (eds.) The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, pp. 19–32. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, Boulder (2008), (retrieved February 26, 2014)
  8. 8.
    Lepi, K.: 25 ways teachers can integrate social media into education (2012), (retrieved February 17, 2014)
  9. 9.
    Ajjan, H., Hartshorne, R.: Investigating faculty decisions to adopt web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education 11, 71–80 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mazman, S.G.: Sosyal ağların benimsenme süreci ve eğitsel bağlamda kullanımı. Unpublished master’s thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saunders, S.: The role of social networking sites in teacher education programs: A qualitative exploration. In: McFerrin, K., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 2223–2228. AACE, Chesapeake (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jenkins, H.: What is learning in a participatory culture? (2009), (retrieved February 17, 2014)
  13. 13.
    Yuen, S.C.Y., Yuen, P.: Web 2.0 in education. In: Conference Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology, pp. 3227–3228 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ipe, M.: Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review 2(4), 337–359 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yi, J.: A measure of knowledge sharing behavior: Scale development and validation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambirdge, ProQuest Digital Dissertation (UMI No. 3204302) (1991)(retrieved February 17, 2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ajjan, H., Hartshorne, R.: Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education 11, 71–80 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cevat Celep
    • 1
  • Tuğba Konaklı
    • 1
  • Nur Kuyumcu
    • 1
  1. 1.Kocaeli UniversityKocaeliTurkey

Personalised recommendations