Advertisement

Abstract

This paper will compare a range of recently developed frameworks, which identify digital skills and competencies drawn from the United Kingdom (UK), from across the wider European Union, and internationally to include Australia. It will also briefly explore who and what is driving this agenda. The models will be set within the context of recent evidence that highlight the deficits that exist in children and young people’s skills and competencies in order to emphasise the need for schools to address this issue. In order to consider the issue more practically, it will explore the digital skills and competencies of one young person who is currently in transition to explore how useful the frameworks are for the development of their skills. It will show the correspondence and divergence between the different frameworks and the composite headings which can be drawn from the content. Examples of these dimensions will be outlined to show how digital technologies, and particularly digital skills and competencies, can influence a specific transition from school to college.

Keywords

Digital skills digital literacy disability 

References

  1. 1.
    Ferrari, A.: Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville (2012), http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC68116.pdf (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  2. 2.
    Hague, C., Payton, S.: Digital literacy across the curriculum. Futurelab, Bristol (2010), http://www2.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/handbooks/digital_literacy.pdf (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  3. 3.
    Department for Education (DfE): The national curriculum in England. Framework document. Reference: DFE-00177-2013 (2013), http://www.gov.uk/dfe/nationalcurriculum (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  4. 4.
    Confederation for British Industry: First steps: A new approach for our schools – ambition (noun) a desire and determination to achieve success. CBI, London (2012), http://www.cbi.org.uk/media/1845483/cbi_education_report_191112.pdf (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  5. 5.
    Livingstone, I., Hope, A.: Next Gen. Transforming the UK into the world’s leading talent hub for the video games and visual effects industries: A Review. Nesta, London (2011), http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/NextGenv32.pdf (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  6. 6.
    European Commission: Europe 2020 Strategy (2010), http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  7. 7.
    Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training & Youth Affairs (MCEETYA): The Melbourne Declaration on the Educational Goals For Young Australians (2008), http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  8. 8.
    Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21): Framework for 21st Century Learning, http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  9. 9.
    Meyers, E.M., Erickson, I., Small, R.V.: Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction. Learning, Media and Technology 38(4), 355–367 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9(5), 1–6 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Princes Trust: Digital Literacy Survey (2013), http://www.princes-trust.org.uk/pdf/DIGITAL_LITERACY_2013B.pdf (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  12. 12.
    Sonck, N., Livingstone, S., Kuiper, E., de Haan, J.: Digital literacy and safety skills. EU Kids Online, London School of Economics & Political Science, London (2011), http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33733/1/Digital%20literacy%20and%20safety%20skills%20lsero.pdf (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  13. 13.
    Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA): Information and communication technology (ICT) capability, http://australiancurriculum.edu.au (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  14. 14.
    Ferrari, A.: DIGICOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, Spain (2013), http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC83167.pdf (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  15. 15.
    National Council of Teachers of English: 21st-Century Literacies. A policy research brief. National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL (2007), http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEfiles/Resources/Magazine/Chron110721CentLitBrief.pdf (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  16. 16.
    BECTA: Digital literacy. Teaching critical thinking for our digital world. BECTA, Coventry (2010), http://tinyurl.com/k5rgdru(retrieved August 30, 2014)
  17. 17.
    Passey, D.: Inclusive technology enhanced learning: Overcoming Cognitive, Physical, Emotional and Geographic Challenges. Routledge, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Strauss, A.: Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newman, T., Blackburn, S.: Interchange 78. Transitions in the Lives of Children and Young People: Resilience Factors. Scottish Executive Education Department, Edinburgh (2002), http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/46997/0024005.pdf (retrieved August 30, 2014)
  20. 20.
    Graham, R.G.: Techno-resiliency: An Exploration of Professional Practices in the Field of Technology-Enriched Teaching and Learning. Lancaster University, Lancaster, Unpublished PhD Thesis (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sue Cranmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational ResearchLancaster UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations