Advertisement

Abstract

This paper explores the underlying assumptions that are often made concerning the beneficial impact of the use of Digital Technologies in relation to the motivation for academic work, and related forms of engagement. In particular, these claims are assessed in the context of an overarching concern with the motivational characteristics that are most likely to abet the effective transition of young people from one context to another. In this light, relevant theories of motivation are explored together with an assessment of how they might, together, provide a more productive basis for the development of the role of Digital Technology in assisting the making of effective transitions.

Keywords

Transition motivation digital technologies 

References

  1. 1.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M. (eds.): Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press, Rochester (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    BBC: Teaching ’better at school than university’ - survey (2011), http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-15150382 (retrieved August 16, 2014)
  3. 3.
    Miller, R.B., Brickman, S.J.: A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review 16, 9–33 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Senko, C., Hulleman, C., Harackiewicz, J.M.: Achievement Goal Theory at the Crossroads: Old Controversies, Current Challenges, and New Directions. Educational Psychologist 46, 26–47 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maehr, M.L., Zusho, A.: Achievement goal theory: the past, present and future. In: Wentzel, K., Wigfield, A. (eds.) Handbook of Motivation at School. Routledge, London (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elliot, A.J.: A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In: Elliot, A.J., Dweck, C.S. (eds.) Handbook of Competence and Motivation. The Guilford Press, London (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pintrich, P.R.: Multiple Goals, Multiple Pathways: The Role of Goal Orientation in Learning and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 92, 544–555 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elliot, A.J., Murayama, K.: On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology 100, 613–628 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dweck, C.S., Molden, D.C.: Self Theories: Their Impact on Competence Motivation and Acquisisiton. In: Elliot, A.J., Dweck, C.S. (eds.) Handbook of Competence and Motivation. The Guilford Press, London (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dweck, C.S.: Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elliot, A.J., McGregor, H.: A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80, 501–519 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Durik, A.M., Lovejoy, C.M., Johnson, S.J.: A longitudinal study of achievement goals for college in general: Predicting cumulative GPA and diversity in course selection. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34, 113–119 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Remedios, R., Kiseleva, Z., Elliott, J.G.: Goal orientations in Russian university students: From mastery to performance? Educational Psychology 28, 677–691 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rogers, C.G.: Transition, self-regulation, independent learning and goal theory. Psychology of Education Review 36, 26–31 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rogers, C.G.: The Vernon Wall Lecture: Psychology in education in a political world: Some thoughts on performativity in higher education. In: The British Psychological Society, Education Section Annual Conference, York (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elliot, A.J., Murayama, K., Pekrun, R.H.: A 3 x 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology 103, 632–648 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ames, C.: The enhancement of student motivation. In: Maehr, M.L., Kleiber, D.A. (eds.) Advances in Motivation and Achievement. Enhancing Motivation, vol. 5, JAI Press, Greenwich (1987)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ames, C.: Motivation: What teachers need to know. Teachers College Record 91, 409–421 (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Condie, R., Munro, B., Seagreaves, L., Kenesson, S.: The impact of ICT in Schools - A landscape review. Becta, Coventry (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hattie, J.: Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge, London (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Higgins, S., Mercier, E.: Multi-touch technologies and motivation in the classroom. In: BERA Annual Conference, Warwick (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blatchford, P., Baines, E., Rubie-Davies, C., Bassett, P., Chowne, A.: The Effect of a New Approach to Group Work on Pupil-Pupil and Teacher-Pupil Interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology 98, 750–765 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bandura, A.: Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. In: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Torff, B., Tirotta, R.: Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education 54, 379–383 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Turel, Y.K.: An interactive whiteboard student survey: Development, validity and reliability. Computers & Education 57, 2441–2450 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E., McFarlane, A., Mavers, D., Scrimshaw, P., Somekh, B., Watling, R.: ICT in schools. In: The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Pupil Learning and Attainment. Research and Evaluation Series, vol. 7. DfES and Becta, Nottingham and Coventry (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Watson, D.M., Cox, M.J., Johnson, D.C.: The Impact Report: An evaluation of the impact of Information Technology on children’s achievements in primary and secondary schools. Department for Education and King’s College London, Centre for Educational Studies, London (1993)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Torgerson, C., Zhu, D.: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ICT on literacy learning in English. In: Research Evidence in Education Library, pp. 5–16. EPPI-Centre Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Livingston, K., Condie, R.: Evaluation of Phase Two of the SCHOLAR Programme Final Report. The Quality in Education Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow (2004)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Valentine, G., Marsh, J., Pattie, C.: Children and Young People’s Home Use of ICT for Educational Purposes: The impact on Attainment at Key Stages, pp. 1–4. DCFS, Nottingham (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K.: Emerging teacher strategies for supporting subject teaching and learning with ICT. University of Cambridge Faculty of Education, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Passey, D., Rogers, C.G., Machell, J., McHugh, G.: The Motivational Effect of ICT on Pupils. DfES, Nottingham (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin Rogers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational ResearchLancaster UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations