Advertisement

Abstract

The ICT profession is extremely international, and so are ICT students. University students in one study group in Europe may represent ten or twenty nationalities with varied cultural and educational backgrounds. Selection of appropriate teaching methods for diverse students is challenging. This paper describes cognitive differences in multinational study groups, and explores ways to overcome some of the differences through offering online programming courses to support classroom instruction. Currently, online programming tools are widely used in schools and outside formal institutions. This paper shows that they can be efficient also when building professional competencies.

Keywords

ICT education programming cultural diversity online courses professional competences 

References

  1. 1.
    Leask, B.: Special issue on Internationalization of the Curriculum and the Disciplines. Journal of Studies in International Education (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aydarova, O.: If Not “the Best of the West,” Then “Look East”: Imported Teacher Education Curricula in the Arabian Gulf. Journal of Studies in International Education 17, 284–302 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holvikivi, J.: Culture and cognition in information technology education. Dissertation Series, vol. 5. SimLab Publications, Espoo (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henrich, J., Heine, S.J., Norenzayan, A.: The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33, 61–83 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiao, J.Y., Cheon, B.K.: The weirdest brains in the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33, 88–90 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hansen, P., Kringelbach, M.: The Neural Bases of Reading. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, C., Xue, G., Mei, L., Chen, C., Dong, Q.: Cultural neurolinguistics. Prog. Brain Res., 178–159 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang, J., Wang, X., Shu, H., Zevin, J.: Brain networks associated with sublexical properties of Chinese characters. Brain and Language 119, 68–79 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, K., Feng, S., Ji, Y., Shen, J., Reiman, E.M., Liu, Y.: Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped by cultures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10775–10780 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilson, M.: The re-tooled mind: How culture re-engineers cognition. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 5, 180–187 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Fleet, J., Watkins, K., Grebel, L.: Africa Learning Barometer (September 17, 2012), http://www.brookings.edu/research/interactives/africa-learning-barometer
  12. 12.
    Ang’ondi, E.K.: Teachers Attitudes and perceptions on the use of ICT in teaching and learning as observed by ICT champions. In: Proc. 10th IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education, Torun (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holvikivi, J.: From theory to practice: Adapting the engineering approach. In: Proc. of International Conference on Engineering Education, Turku (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, Y.-T., McCauley, C.R., Draguns, J.G.: Personality and Person Perception Across Cultures. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Inc., Mahwah (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holvikivi, J.: Cultural variation in perception and coding in IT students. In: Proc. 10th IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education, Torun (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    van de Vijver, F.J.R.: On the meaning of cross-cultural differences in simple cognitive measures. Educational Research and Evaluation 14, 215–234 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dalsgaard, F., Du, X., Kolmos, A.: Innovative application of a new PBL model to interdisciplinary and intercultural projects. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 47, 174–188 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bereiter, C.: Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., Lehtinen, E.: Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Elsevier, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., Eastmond, E.: The scratch programming language and environment. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holvikivi, J.: Conditions for Successful Learning of Programming Skills. In: Reynolds, N., Turcsányi-Szabó, M. (eds.) KCKS 2010. IFIP AICT, vol. 324, pp. 155–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laakso, M.-J.: Promoting Programming Learning. Engagement, Automatic Assessment with Immediate Feedback in Visualizations. University of Turku, Turku (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaana Holvikivi
    • 1
  1. 1.Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied SciencesFinland

Personalised recommendations